Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by

->In this index, “by-dong” is defined as disparities in living conditions between dong as living communities, not the number of administrative dong. Interpreting it based on dong counts is a misreading of the indicator

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

Full record & evidence: www.notion.so/2cadb5c89aa9...

Please check the Notion page for supporting documents. Sharing is appreciated.

#Transparency #AdministrativeRecord #Accountability #NotImplemented

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

- If the items above are not publicly disclosed by 2025-12-25, the project / department / pledge will be recorded as **Not Implemented**.
- This record will be used only as baseline data for monthly monitoring beginning January 2026. No scores, grades, or subjective judgments are included.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

If any item remains undisclosed by that date, the related project / department / pledge will be recorded as **“Not Implemented.”**

Items to be fixed:
1. Budget allocation status
2. Responsible department
3. Quarterly disclosure method
4. Administrative measures if targets are missed

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

# Administrative Record Notice (Not an Evaluation)

**Deadline (fixed record):** 2025-12-25

**Summary**
This post is an administrative record, not an evaluation. The public disclosure status of the following four items will be fixed as of the deadline below.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

#PublicAdministration #RiskRating #ComplaintPatterns #PolicyFrame #OpenData #IndicatorDesign

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

Dec 11–14 is the key frame-capture window. The flow is accelerating ahead of the official schedule on Dec 16 — posting now maximizes impact.

#DecemberWeek3 #PolicyAnalysis #ScoringMechanics #IndicatorConversion #ARating #BRating #CRating #ComplexDefects #InterfloorNoise #PineWilt #DataPolicy

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

3) Pine wilt / pest risk
- Utterance: “Suspected pine wilt in trees”
- Conversion: urban/green management → pest/disease risk → spread potential assessment
- Rating: A (community spread risk → immediate action)

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

2) Noise complaints
- Utterance: “Inter-floor noise is unbearable”
- Conversion: living environment → noise complaint → time-of-day & frequency analysis
- Rating: C → auto-escalate to B on repeated occurrence

4 months ago 1 0 0 0

🟩 Indicator conversion demo (Resident utterance → structured data)
1) Complex defects (housing)
- Utterance: “There are many defects”
- Conversion: safety & maintenance → structural/equipment faults → repeat-record
- Rating: B (repeat pattern present)

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

- Patterns matter more than single incidents.
- Unit of analysis is area/line, not individual.
- A → immediate response; B → operational adjustments; C → record & monitor.
- Ratings act as automatic switches for risk-response protocols.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

🔎 Scoring table — 10-line summary
- A/B/C indicate risk stages.
- A = immediate action required.
- B = warning; adjustment needed.
- C = monitoring stage.
- Formula = weight × frequency × persistence.
- Repeated complaints automatically raise the rating.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image Post image

December Week 3 Brief: “Scoring Table Mechanics” + Indicator Conversion Demo

In policy and administration, the most important question is: how does the scoring table actually operate? A/B/C ratings are not simple scores — treat them like risk traffic lights.

4 months ago 0 0 7 0

We'll compile and submit them officially to Pohang City. (Anonymous option available)

#Pohang #LivingZoneData #ResidentSafety #UrbanTransparency

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

Green space linkage to disaster/environment response at living-zone scale
Cross-boundary infrastructure connectivity & authority redesign beyond admin districts
Without this data, policies and safety measures won't work.

Share your neighborhood cases (photo, location, one line) via comments/DMs.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

Generation-specific needs: youth vs. elderly (service/infrastructure reallocation)
Industrial workers' housing-life connectivity (living zones, consumption patterns)
Foreign residents' living conditions (essential labor ratio, household types, density)

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Pohang's 2030 revision plan only covers the "downtown axis."

But critical data on residents' daily living zones remains undisclosed. It must be released immediately.

Missing items (LSR) — we demand transparency:
Real living zone gaps between Buk-gu & Nam-gu (mobility patterns, service access)

4 months ago 0 0 3 0

#Pohang #LocalElections2026 #CitizensSetTheStandard #Transparency #VerifiedVoters #PrioritizeLiving

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

Data produced by Pohang residents will be the basis for judgment.
Choices in 2026 will be based on verification, not emotion — it’s a time to ask about daily life rather than just development.
Those who hide information will be the first to lose trust.
2026: the standard is set by the citizens

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

2026: Citizens Set the Standard — December 5 Year‑End Commitment

✨ December 5 — a slightly early year‑end commitment
We close out 2025 and let citizens set the standards for 2026.
Promises without data, procedure, and transparency are no longer acceptable.

4 months ago 0 0 2 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

Impact: Faster resident notification, fewer repeated complaints, and stronger administrative transparency.

Details: [Notion link]
www.notion.so/2bedb5c89aa9...

#PublicSafety #Pohang

(Contact: xxxxx@xxxx.xxx)

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

Solution: Connect the city’s hazardous-facility DB with GIS to automatically calculate 500m impact zones, display them on public map pages, enable optional resident alerts, and integrate with the municipal complaint system for automated processing.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
The AI workspace that works for you. | Notion A tool that connects everyday work into one space. It gives you and your teams AI tools—search, writing, note-taking—inside an all-in-one, flexible workspace.

Proposal: Real-time disclosure system for hazardous facilities (500m radius) — Budget: 120M KRW.

Problem: Public disclosure of hazardous-site information currently takes 7–14 days after resident complaints, delaying both awareness and emergency response.

4 months ago 0 0 2 0

but who moves the structure — and numbers prove it.

🎯 One Line to Citizens

> Pohang’s policies are now evaluated by data, not slogans.
Results will be published every month.

---

#Pohang #LSR #YIS #EGI
#DataPolitics #PolicyVerification #CivicMetrics #Dec1

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

• Culture & Welfare Events — ⭐⭐⭐ good sentiment · weak制度
• Pohang-Ulleung Link — ⭐⭐ fragile connectivity
• Food Waste Facility (closed-door) — ⭐ conflict amplified

🔥 Overall

Pohang didn’t lack policies.
It lacked criteria.

Now the question is no longer
who speaks louder,

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

3️⃣ EGI — 5-Year Risk Signal

EGI has entered the 70 zone.
Consumption · Population · On-site data reacting.
→ Warning Level

📊 Policy/Project Summary

• K-Battery Triangle — ⭐⭐⭐ sound structure · weak impact
• Yeongilman Port Swell — ⭐⭐⭐ visible structural shift

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

1️⃣ LSR — Structural Reality

Promotion focuses on South,
but real life has shifted North.
→ Caution

2️⃣ YIS — Short-term Instability

The risk doesn’t start next year.
It begins this winter.
→ Warning

4 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

📢 Dec 1, 2025 — Pohang LSR·YIS·EGI 1st Evaluation

From today, Pohang’s policies and projects
are measured not by words, but by numbers.

Monthly evaluation will be published under:
LSR (Structural) · YIS (Short-term) · EGI (5-year Risk)

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

🏷 Tags

#Pohang #PolicyReview #LSR #YIS #EGI
#MetricsOverNarrative #PublicData #CivicStandards

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

The core principle remains simple and uncompromised:

> Not narrative, but metrics.
Not slogans, but data.
Policy is judged by evidence — not by claims.

This structure will continue to be used to
monitor, verify, and document public policy across the city
with transparency and consistency.

4 months ago 0 0 0 0