->In this index, “by-dong” is defined as disparities in living conditions between dong as living communities, not the number of administrative dong. Interpreting it based on dong counts is a misreading of the indicator
Posts by
Full record & evidence: www.notion.so/2cadb5c89aa9...
Please check the Notion page for supporting documents. Sharing is appreciated.
#Transparency #AdministrativeRecord #Accountability #NotImplemented
- If the items above are not publicly disclosed by 2025-12-25, the project / department / pledge will be recorded as **Not Implemented**.
- This record will be used only as baseline data for monthly monitoring beginning January 2026. No scores, grades, or subjective judgments are included.
If any item remains undisclosed by that date, the related project / department / pledge will be recorded as **“Not Implemented.”**
Items to be fixed:
1. Budget allocation status
2. Responsible department
3. Quarterly disclosure method
4. Administrative measures if targets are missed
# Administrative Record Notice (Not an Evaluation)
**Deadline (fixed record):** 2025-12-25
**Summary**
This post is an administrative record, not an evaluation. The public disclosure status of the following four items will be fixed as of the deadline below.
Dec 11–14 is the key frame-capture window. The flow is accelerating ahead of the official schedule on Dec 16 — posting now maximizes impact.
#DecemberWeek3 #PolicyAnalysis #ScoringMechanics #IndicatorConversion #ARating #BRating #CRating #ComplexDefects #InterfloorNoise #PineWilt #DataPolicy
3) Pine wilt / pest risk
- Utterance: “Suspected pine wilt in trees”
- Conversion: urban/green management → pest/disease risk → spread potential assessment
- Rating: A (community spread risk → immediate action)
2) Noise complaints
- Utterance: “Inter-floor noise is unbearable”
- Conversion: living environment → noise complaint → time-of-day & frequency analysis
- Rating: C → auto-escalate to B on repeated occurrence
🟩 Indicator conversion demo (Resident utterance → structured data)
1) Complex defects (housing)
- Utterance: “There are many defects”
- Conversion: safety & maintenance → structural/equipment faults → repeat-record
- Rating: B (repeat pattern present)
- Patterns matter more than single incidents.
- Unit of analysis is area/line, not individual.
- A → immediate response; B → operational adjustments; C → record & monitor.
- Ratings act as automatic switches for risk-response protocols.
🔎 Scoring table — 10-line summary
- A/B/C indicate risk stages.
- A = immediate action required.
- B = warning; adjustment needed.
- C = monitoring stage.
- Formula = weight × frequency × persistence.
- Repeated complaints automatically raise the rating.
December Week 3 Brief: “Scoring Table Mechanics” + Indicator Conversion Demo
In policy and administration, the most important question is: how does the scoring table actually operate? A/B/C ratings are not simple scores — treat them like risk traffic lights.
We'll compile and submit them officially to Pohang City. (Anonymous option available)
#Pohang #LivingZoneData #ResidentSafety #UrbanTransparency
Green space linkage to disaster/environment response at living-zone scale
Cross-boundary infrastructure connectivity & authority redesign beyond admin districts
Without this data, policies and safety measures won't work.
Share your neighborhood cases (photo, location, one line) via comments/DMs.
Generation-specific needs: youth vs. elderly (service/infrastructure reallocation)
Industrial workers' housing-life connectivity (living zones, consumption patterns)
Foreign residents' living conditions (essential labor ratio, household types, density)
Pohang's 2030 revision plan only covers the "downtown axis."
But critical data on residents' daily living zones remains undisclosed. It must be released immediately.
Missing items (LSR) — we demand transparency:
Real living zone gaps between Buk-gu & Nam-gu (mobility patterns, service access)
Data produced by Pohang residents will be the basis for judgment.
Choices in 2026 will be based on verification, not emotion — it’s a time to ask about daily life rather than just development.
Those who hide information will be the first to lose trust.
2026: the standard is set by the citizens
2026: Citizens Set the Standard — December 5 Year‑End Commitment
✨ December 5 — a slightly early year‑end commitment
We close out 2025 and let citizens set the standards for 2026.
Promises without data, procedure, and transparency are no longer acceptable.
Impact: Faster resident notification, fewer repeated complaints, and stronger administrative transparency.
Details: [Notion link]
www.notion.so/2bedb5c89aa9...
#PublicSafety #Pohang
(Contact: xxxxx@xxxx.xxx)
Solution: Connect the city’s hazardous-facility DB with GIS to automatically calculate 500m impact zones, display them on public map pages, enable optional resident alerts, and integrate with the municipal complaint system for automated processing.
Proposal: Real-time disclosure system for hazardous facilities (500m radius) — Budget: 120M KRW.
Problem: Public disclosure of hazardous-site information currently takes 7–14 days after resident complaints, delaying both awareness and emergency response.
but who moves the structure — and numbers prove it.
🎯 One Line to Citizens
> Pohang’s policies are now evaluated by data, not slogans.
Results will be published every month.
---
#Pohang #LSR #YIS #EGI
#DataPolitics #PolicyVerification #CivicMetrics #Dec1
• Culture & Welfare Events — ⭐⭐⭐ good sentiment · weak制度
• Pohang-Ulleung Link — ⭐⭐ fragile connectivity
• Food Waste Facility (closed-door) — ⭐ conflict amplified
🔥 Overall
Pohang didn’t lack policies.
It lacked criteria.
Now the question is no longer
who speaks louder,
3️⃣ EGI — 5-Year Risk Signal
EGI has entered the 70 zone.
Consumption · Population · On-site data reacting.
→ Warning Level
📊 Policy/Project Summary
• K-Battery Triangle — ⭐⭐⭐ sound structure · weak impact
• Yeongilman Port Swell — ⭐⭐⭐ visible structural shift
1️⃣ LSR — Structural Reality
Promotion focuses on South,
but real life has shifted North.
→ Caution
2️⃣ YIS — Short-term Instability
The risk doesn’t start next year.
It begins this winter.
→ Warning
📢 Dec 1, 2025 — Pohang LSR·YIS·EGI 1st Evaluation
From today, Pohang’s policies and projects
are measured not by words, but by numbers.
Monthly evaluation will be published under:
LSR (Structural) · YIS (Short-term) · EGI (5-year Risk)
The core principle remains simple and uncompromised:
> Not narrative, but metrics.
Not slogans, but data.
Policy is judged by evidence — not by claims.
This structure will continue to be used to
monitor, verify, and document public policy across the city
with transparency and consistency.