so to cinvince us he would have had to either had credibility on not being for some war in the past, or promise extra heard, and he didnt do either one

biden promisedto make noises, but not to actually do anything that would make peace. just the same old promises that weve watched the us squirm out of before.

they owe us someone who worked for the underprivleged her whole life and who the fbi tried and failed to frame for 40 years

fbi cheated against hillary, and voting for anyone less liberal than her justy feels like tokenism, especially a woman. If the us cant stand a woman unless who passes the police purity test then its a police state, and they owe us more than a token

good point. and the answer is we care about all suffering, but the way available resources can be used to do the most good is by focusing them on where the public support is. but dont worry, sooner or later pewople will bame someione for sudan too and it might be US

our real nature is Sat (Absolute Existence/Truth), Chit (Pure Consciousness/Awareness), and Ananda (Limitless Bliss/Completeness). but when we become ignorant of our true nature, we suffer

Killing innocent people centralizes power because whatever power they had is gone, given up to whoevcer killed them

if hey are in england it could mean a party name. But in the us ot means they distreibute power instead of centralize it And if they dont do that then they are just liars

when we have a cop in the shite house the crooks dont get to go free. So why should it work the other way around?

They will never get better until they grovel in the trumps mud like the pathetic worms that are. and they have now begun that process

trump turned millions and millions of demicrats against war, and thats waay way better cause when they were3 just lieinbg to us to get war they didnt squirnm and cry

Thats what thge founding fathers wanted.

there is no blame. There is people who deliberately kill the largest number of innocent people and people who dont. People who do won, botrh partoies are oin their said and they git the lor d and master that stinks like they do, Boggle solved.

only the people who want war could have done that, because both parties want war. But most of them want trump. since they are the majority shouldnt most opf them get what most of them want?

teres clues,killing innocent people to take is a clue, or stealing a lot of money from others and giving it to less people tan they stole it from. Its an ideology do actual acts are objectively liberal or illiberal

liberals distribute power conservatives centralize power.

they arent really liberal, they just like the name.

Do we have Free Will? by Swami Sarvapriyananda YouTube video by Vedanta Society of New York

the truth isnt as it appears, and the only way you really know if something is true enough to be useful is if it makes you more free. youtu.be/VzbyeU3dK4g?...

Do we have Free Will? by Swami Sarvapriyananda YouTube video by Vedanta Society of New York

oh heres a video that goes with that, because i cant strress how important what we call free will is, but it in truth is not really free. its the ability to obey our our nature, but nature makes the rules.
youtu.be/VzbyeU3dK4g?...

the idea of free will is very important to morality and society, but we are finding out that its based on the laws of physics. its just nerves and electro chemical reactions. and in advaita we solve this mystery, by saying that science rules this world and the world exists inside of self awareness

some people are saying thats onl because trump was somehow worse than ussual. But of course thats just an ideological opinion

I mean the object is least harm, not least blame.

The rest is why we shold take the l;east harm seriously and not subjecate it to the christian lawyer ball that is all about who to blame. one you realize the onject is least harm and least blame, you see that the its nit just to win a war, its to take the profit out offorcing us into war

what you call bad, is when nature fights nature. even within my own body when the nature of some organs fight the natuire of others, there is suffering. but ahimsa cuts across many diverse philosophocal traditions. and the least harm, in cases of extortion, is to take the profit out of the crime

I believe in determinism, which is what science is based on. We are all slaves to nature

probably the first one

hes obeying his nature, and causing suffering because it conflictes with the nature of others around him. and by merging our nature with his we could figure out a way to eliminate that conflict or better tolerate it as axtention of our own nature.

I dont believe in evil only ignorance. Or free will, except as it relates to obeying ones nature, which means we are all slaves to nature. i bleieve this world and everything in it is ruled by science.

if they pay attentin to something long enough the way they see it will change. and over time, they will realize that itsnit the object that changes, just the way they see it. So al religions are true, they all lead to heaven. christians say 'if you follow them faithfully with an open heart'

and I'm not Buddhist. But Buddhism inst the only ideology that observes ahimsa. It cuts across many religious and non religious traditions.