MCP connector for AudioAlpha.
Get financial podcast info straight into your favorite AI tool like Claude Desktop.
With one prompt you have immediate access to our database of 60k+ podcast episodes. 40+ custom metrics as well as full episodes transcripts, summaries and trends for over 1000 assets.
Get podcast sentiment data directly inside Claude.
Query α-sentiment scores, narrative intensity, consensus levels, and attention share across 100+ crypto podcasts—without switching tabs or hitting APIs manually.
AudioAlpha's MCP server. Set up in 2 minutes with our free plan.
#claude #crypto
Which tension worries you more: supply compression from ETFs or adoption friction (payments/stablecoins)? Reply with one word — Supply or Adoption.
Psychology angle: greed-FOMO among allocators is rising (high price targets discussed), while retail remains skeptical. That two-track market raises asymmetric outcomes — a custody/ETF squeeze could amplify upside, a liquidity shock could flip it fast.
Top mover: $SOL — podcasters flagged L1 choice as operational for institutions. Sentiment jumped +2.5 in 1d (mean 7.0) and α-Pulse is 0.59. Solana is being discussed as an institutional rails candidate, not just a DeFi story.
Quick read: hosts framed macro (Fed liquidity, dollar weakness) as an enabling backdrop for institutional Bitcoin flows, not the core driver. Consensus is concentrated (~0.16) across 5 episodes — that makes conviction powerful but brittle to a single large event.
Today's signal: Podcasts converged on a locked-supply thesis — ETFs and corporate custody are compressing BTC float and concentrating upside risk. α-sentiment is 6.8 (+0.4 1d) and five episodes focused this week; the regime reads Bullish Accumulation with fragility.
Which crack scares you more — miner liquidations or regulatory hits to mortgage/ETF plumbing? Why?
What flips this? A concrete counterfactual: if miners dump another ~10–25k BTC in a few days, podcast conviction shifts from ‘institutional absorption’ to ‘episodic supply shock’ and hosts pivot to risk-off frames.
The Friction Report: The load-bearing crack in podcast narrative is institutional demand vs. concentrated miner supply. Hosts prize productization (ETF filings, Fannie Mae mortgages) as bid for $BTC — but a disclosed ~15k BTC miner sale today shows how quickly that thesis can be taxed.
Question to leave you with: if Fannie Mae mortgages scale, can miner and dormant-wallet selling be absorbed without breaking the narrative? Which side do you trust to set near-term outcomes?
Psychology has split: greed moved from whales to retail and product managers after the Fannie Mae/ETF news, but tactical fear shows up as DCA, grid bots and hedging talk in episodes. The market is bullish-on-adoption but sizing for distribution events.
Top mover: $IBIT — podcast α-sentiment 8.0 with a 1d delta +4.0 and an α-Pulse of 0.56. Hosts linked the rise to ETF/low-fee product chatter and mortgage-collateral discussion, making IBIT a narrative play in the productization story.
The move from 'possible' to 'operational' matters: 46% of episodes focused on Fannie Mae mortgage plumbing, while 38% flagged miner/dormant-wallet selling. That tug-of-war explains why α-sentiment is up 1d but 7d remains negative — concrete adoption, immediate distribution.
Fannie Mae-compatible mortgages and a fresh round of ETF filings flipped the conversation: podcasters now treat crypto as productized finance, not just speculation. α-sentiment 6.4 (1d +0.9) and α-Index 0.63 show the narrative has real traction — but fragility remains.
Which narrative do you think will dominate podcasts next 48 hours — macro ($DXY), stablecoin policy ($USDT/$USDC), DeFi credit ($AAVE) or meme momentum ($GME)?
Acceleration here means a rapid narrative pivot: $DXY up => macro risk-off framing; $USDT/$USDC up => regulatory/stablecoin fragility is climbing the agenda; $AAVE up => DeFi credit and yield migration talk is re-energized. These are early narrative signals worth watching.
α-Pulse Leaderboard — macro and stablecoin chatter are accelerating in podcasts.
1. $DXY — 0.90
2. $USDT — 0.85
3. $GME — 0.72
4. $USDC — 0.63
5. $AAVE — 0.63
DXY’s surge ties to oil/yields; stablecoins move from innovation to policy risk. This is podcast intelligence, not financial advice.
Do stablecoin audits or ETF/corporate stacking matter more for crypto's next narrative swing? Which one and why?
These rankings mean narrative dominance is about credibility not just price: $BTC owns attention, but $USDT's higher α-Index signals a tighter, more coherent podcast narrative around audits and policy—a structural theme worth watching amid macro-driven de-risking.
α-Index Leaderboard — stablecoin legitimacy edges out raw Bitcoin chatter today. 1. $USDT — 0.56 2. $BTC — 0.51 3. $GME — 0.47 Podcasters are focused on audits, regulatory plumbing and product risk even as $BTC commands most attention. Snapshot: institutional stacking vs macro de-risking.
Which data would you watch to call the next regime change — weekly ETF flows, oil, or on‑chain stablecoin outflows?
What flips the script? Two concrete counters: sustained net inflows to BTC ETFs and miners (weeks of positive flow >$X) would stabilize price ranges; or a persistent >$95 oil regime and higher 10Y yields would force more outflows and liquidations. Watch ETF flow cadence, miner sales, oil/yield traj.
The Friction Report: The load-bearing crack in podcasts is institutional stacking vs short-term outflows. $BTC ETF filings and corporate buys create a structural bid, but a 171M outflow day and retail de-risking make every rally hinge on fragile liquidity. α-sentiment 5.5; α-Index 0.55; α-Pulse 0.30
Question: which pod-driven narrative are you watching as most market-moving right now — institutional demand resumption, miner supply, or stablecoin/regulatory outcomes? Explain why.
Psychology angle: traders heard FOMO and fear in the same episodes — bullish talk about BTC replacing some gold demand sits beside "dump" language tied to ETF withdrawals and miner sales. That oscillation is a volatility magnet until flows normalize.
Top mover: $AAVE popped in podcast chatter as DeFi narratives re-emerged around upgrades and yield primitives. Sentiment 1d Δ +2.5, α-Pulse 0.6 — podcasters framing AAVE as a short-term narrative play amid broader risk-off talk.
Market insight: pods tied macro shocks (Iran, oil) to a 42bp weekly 10yr move and short-term risk aversion. Consensus across 28 episodes is thin (consensus score 0.07) — attention high, conviction slipping. Chainlink flows noted as a relative bright spot.
Today's signal: podcast panels are split — strong institutional framing (ETFs, corporate treasuries, Fannie Mae collateral moves) vs. visible distribution (a $171M ETF outflow, MARA ~15k BTC sale). α-sentiment 5.6 (1d Δ -0.6) — narrative strength intact but fragile.
Do you trust deep podcast conviction (high α-Index) more than sheer attention share when sizing narrative risk?
