But we should care about rural Virginia and not say Fuck Them! when at most we mean white rural Virginians, and really not all of them. We need to get people to recognize the diversity. (I'm agreeing with you, tbc.)

Is that what the OP was talking about? Seems a stretch to me.

All screen readers, all autocorrect (which people don't turn off, despite their flaws), rely on ai. LLM's are different. You would have no Siri at all without ai.
Btw, Apple basically gave up on its own LLM a bit ago, and now uses someone else's.

Btw, the ADA has not caught up with the times, and is no help for things that are too small to sue over. The amount of things out there that aren't ADA compliant is ridiculous, sadly. On the internet, if something can be read by screen readers, which are AI, that's as far as the ADA goes.

I think people don't realize, when they say ai, it brings in a bunch of things that aren't LLM's, and it's important to remember that, because that stuff matters. Perhaps I could have said that, I admit. Would you have noticed it? I don't know.

I would not be able to use it because of my disability, but sure.

I'm sorry, how is he 90% responsible when it has no social media app? And if you think the iphone is responsible, he wasn't particularly involved in that?

He has to cook apples for every single employee and then he gets to change his name.
Tim Onion on the other hand . . .

Well, how are you going to bring them to 2026 and somehow update all their priors at the same time.

Not if you are LGBTQ+

There's some magic word something like "auditor" that will always do the trick, but I forgot the word immediately after hearing it.

And are expected to work long, long hours with a ton of stress.

What it's doing in mathematics is fascinating.

And try again to get something better, with patience, sure, I would not get a, say, good website. Without much trying I could get a website that works.

Especially about the coding. Maybe someone like me who can't code at all will not be able to get it to code like the Ukrainians coding their robots, but that's not the test.
The problem with my hypothetical coding is I would not know what I really want, & if I don't think about that and try again,

Plus I can never really be comfortable with the show, it's tweeness puts me off.

Man, I cannot stand Liz, played by Christa Miller, endlessly annoying, and can't watch the new season bc of it. She keeps horning into scenes.
Further annoying, she's by far the character closest to me.

I've never met a therapist with a stern manner, and the number who still use a reclining couch is micro small. What a ridiculous straw man (person?)!

And of course the problem with applying this doctrine or jus ad bellum is that we are in fact the aggressors here, so it doesn't apply at all, or only to Iran's striking back, which are so limited to this situation, no general rule applies.

And the bad cops do nothing more. Do not check out the defendant's claims, do not even check if it was possible for the person to do the crime. Certainly don't look at other possible suspects. The laziest cops imaginable.

I thought it probably was a lot of attention, but yes, I can see how STT would be confused with that one.

the fast posting seems to have a result, but would it if the left did it? And I don't understand anything about this.

I thought it was wrong bc an immutable trait is only going to be used against you, and isn't how the world works. (And what about bisexuals?) A (more or less) immutable characteristic by definition says nothing about moral worth or deservedness, but that will always be claimed.

Instead, both in court and in discourse the gay rights movement argued it was an immutable characteristic, making gay people a discrete insular minority, necessitating protection from discrimination. Which I thought was a mistake at the time. And wandering into research on a gay gene was asinine.

My mind flashed red at the "born that way" comment bc genetics vs environment was not why btw* came about, in a way that is connected here. Instead it was a reaction to the argument that being gay was just a choice, and it was fine to discriminate against people for choices they make.

This Moby Dick post was right under the prompt in my feed. The gods have chosen.

There’s hogsheads of sperm ahead.

That's it in it's theoretical beauty. A bunch of revolving mini supreme courts that might or might not be able to overrule each other would be it in it's miraculous chaotic madness beauty.

A lot of these proposals sound like the triumph of the legal realists to me, but I don't think that's the intention.

But Darth don't you know there's going to be a state of the art hospital inside the ballroom? How can anyone possibly stop that?