Every stream needs a Wes. :D

Looking forward to watch Anika with Geddy and Alex in Cologne. #Rush #AnikaNilles

Discord > Out! Stoat > In!

My problem with his prose style (nicely put hehe) is, who does he think he is going to convince with that approach? I understand his frustration, but he isn't helping.

They don't play by "the rule", but their actions are pretty predictable. Beside, I don't react well (or think your thoughts are worth reading) if I am insulted in the first post.

Not too fond of that thread. While there sure is a lot of truth in it, it is also way too vague and broadly simplifying when it suites it's narrative.

I am waiting for their version of the Tank Driver of Mordor and Trump joining Darth Vader and later taking over the Empire.

Sounds spicey!

I might be a bit harsh on wet toast, tho.

Because her voters are uninformed enough to believe it. Translate uninformed here to dumb as a wet toast.

Could she, let's call it, deliberately lying?

Argueing with an devout christian about the interpretation of The Lord of the Rings is.... complicated.

Auf den ersten Blick populistisch, auf den zweiten Blick putinistisch.

Hey hey. I got a suggestion regarind the Eisenhorn book. Could you PM me? :)

I think mobility plays a big part, too. Crossing the pond was not exactly cheap or convenient until not too long ago.

Did you write this with the Vizzini voice in mind?

Problem is, at the next french election you will again consider it, as it looks right now.

Yeah I do, it's basically called Electronic Arts. Nice irony in the name. :)

Since this was my turf... I think world design for games is a bit more complicated. It depends on many factors and depending on the world size, I would have appreciated an AI tool to help. But on the other hand, really magical areas need an artist. I actually play a good example for that atm.

Es gibt etwas wie logische Konsequenz. Das ist der ultimative common ground. Wer die ablehnt ist Flacherdler. Wobei es da natürlich eine Schnittmenge mit AfDlern gibt. ;)

Das ist zB ein Punkt, wenn sie Infos ohne Grund ablehnen können, müssen sie akzeptieren das ich das auch kann, was dann wieder zu reinen Logikargumenten führt. Etwas komplexer das ganze, aber geht. Geht natürlich nicht in 2 Minuten.

Ach so, und ich muss oft gar nicht mit den "Systemmedien" argumentieren, das geht oft einfacher mit Logik.

Das betrifft die hardcore-hansel und ist sicher richtig. Aber die diskutieren auch nicht sondern pöbeln oder predigen. Ich rede eher von den "mitläufern". Die deren Lügen glauben ohne sich selbst richtig informiert zu haben, oder zu können. Mit denen KANN man reden.

Diskussionen nicht aus dem Weg gehen, auch wenn es nervt. Bei diesen Gesprächen beharrlich auf Quellenangabe (zumindest grob) beharren, immer aufkommende logische Fehler aufzeigen. Ihnen nicht erzählen was richtig ist, sondern ihnen zeigen wo ihre Logik- und Informationsprobleme liegen.

The difference is the position. IMHO he needs to say it. Or it's even his job to say it.

Hi there!

Yeah, one of my teachers on technical high school was the same, he worked for Opel and got frustrated because of it, too.

Computers (as in PC) is relative. Only if you buy HP or Dell corporate crap.

So, I guess that's it for facebook.