Yeah, I’m constantly tortured by the thought of having two good QBs. The fact that one of them cost us like $20 is an endless source of agony too.
Does it bother you that the player you picked to be the crown jewel of your franchise is getting ground into dust because you forgot to protect him?
Hang the banner next to the one for your last winning season (7 years ago), plus all the trophies for crushing every offseason
Setting the 🤡 tone early
I see posts saying this is a bluff…eh I see no reason it would be. A provocation leading to martial law in US cities in the first 30 days feels very possible. www.nytimes.com/2025/01/17/u...
It’s as subtle as a piano falling from a fifth story window
We're in a moment when people believe bizarre nonsense to a dizzying breadth & depth, but it hasn't gone truly mainstream in real actions that alter society on a generational level.
The next 20 years will involve a lot of people doing really dumb and deluded stuff, with a lot of lives flushed.
We’re looking at a mini-rebuild and need a shift in coaching / play-calling duties if it’s not going o all be for naught when it counts. Go Pack.
When, coach? We’ve also seen what Musgrave can do in the pass game, so what are doing here.
Not sure how you can say that when we won zero big games this season. Decent team, no signature wins.
It’s not rocket science, but neither are most of our pervasive self-inflicted social disorders
Poisoning men against domestic life is a real crime and it’s also scandalously incoherent.
I’d love to find an effective way to promote the fact that manhood and attention to the home are not zero sum, and to embrace the whole spectrum of domestic skills from cleaning to carpentry to parenting.
Plus it’s inevitable.
Novels are written about what we’re seeing in these five seconds
Amy Coney Barrett you are out of compliance
Assuming you include petty crimes in this idea of arresting people, this is largely consistent with the Giuliani approach in the 90s.
Everything is signaling now and we could it all tone it down, but I wouldn't necessarily start with virtue
Yeah, outreach and resources to the homeless may pay 10x in human and economic dividends, and it's fair for NYC to offer its least fortunate citizens a hand. But in terms of scale, they only chip away at the sheer number of homeless.
"Build more housing" - agree in principle but it's just words
Ah, it was politics all along? Shocked.
The actual question was "does any attempt to not have the homeless clogging public facilities involve forcibly moving them at scale?"
And the answer is yes.
Not advocating for 10,000 bed warehouses upstate. But boutique solutions can't solve large-scale problems.
We went through this in the '70s, replacing institutions with community-based solutions (which were largely a panacea).
Most immediately though, clean safe subway stations means mass arrests
"There's nowhere else they can be, but also they can simply go somewhere else when reminded to"
It's just that "we should reopen mental hospitals and fill them with the homeless"
would be a little more forthright.
and it is possible that we agree on this.
Now you're just pouting. Suck and fuck, very nice.
Anything to avoid admitting geopolitics and war are a little more complex than pat moral judgments and bright-line definitions we craft entirely around our own comfort.
Nice passive voice
It's *your* definition that you seemed so sure of. Would you like to try again?
What could it possibly matter what I think is "appropriate"?
You either let them be there, or you remove them.
Pretending a person afraid of being assaulted is actually just complaining about dust is failing to confront this rather basic choice.
Too easy
So a successful war is a casualty-free war?
One war please, hold the bodies, and yes I'd like fries with that.