HiVE over vibe: meaning coder in the loop, small reviewable changes, reproducible runs. Speed without sacrifice. Your workflow, your choice.
What would you run in parallel first: refactor vs rewrite, two test strategies, or competing prompts?
Code faster with:
• Builders: each assistant on its own isolated Git branch/worktree
• Live Agent Comparison on identical prompts
• Zero port collisions and flow-first hotkeys
• Your stack: Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Amazon Q, Goose, Aider, plus 20+ IDEs whenever you need them
🚀 Parallel coding is the new normal
Last week, a few big players confirmed what we've known: the future is agent-first and in parallel.
And that’s why we built DevSwarm: the most advanced ADE, for High-Velocity Engineering (HiVE).
Start Swarming -> https://devswarm.ai
SF Tech week on the future of AI and code.
Seeing it. We use this to 5x our development beyond just Claude Code or Codex. Want to move even faster? Check it out
DevSwarm running local without internet. No token costs.
There’s nothing wrong with vibe coding for simple things, prototypes, and code that doesn’t go to prod.
But high velocity engineering is serious coding practices meant for scalable, secure systems. This “hive” coding has been getting lumped under vibe coding, but the difference is code matters.
You thought Claude Code was fast. Use Claude Code but make it parallel, and keep the IDE-like experience you know and love too.
Yes!! Excited to release this!
Moving backwards
Perfect summary. No oversight. Who are they if they are not required to provide anything?
Mohsen Mahdawi, who has been a green-card holder for 10 years, was detained at an ICE field center in Vermont while appearing for a naturalization test — a key step on the path to U.S. citizenship. wapo.st/3Y36270
“Mommy, no. Mommy.”
Daughter captures the moment masked ICE agents smash the window of her mother's car in order to take her into custody.
The government claims the 52-year old seamstress is an associate of the MS-13 gang.
www.thebaltimorebanner.com/community/lo...
One of so many examples. This is how economies work. Cascading effects when things are chaotic. Hard to build businesses on top of uncertainty and chaos.
If only there was a vac…..oh.
"History will remember this day— when an American President and Vice President abandoned all we stand for."
What an embarrassing question.
And cutting World Trade Center Health Program too. Who would do that?!?
Good point. Me saving thousands of dollars by not paying my mortgage does not mean I saved money.
The US is suddenly putting our faith in Putin instead of Ukraine. How does this end well?!
A point to consider.
They are just swinging sledgehammers in the dark.
So many stories.
How should the research community respond? #ScienceFunding #NIH #ResearchInnovation
Oh, and is X how the government now communicates?
This is a reckless decision with serious consequences for public health and scientific progress. Cutting indirect costs might seem like a budget-saving move, but in reality, it undermines the very system that fuels innovation.
Early-career researchers and smaller institutions will be hit the hardest. If universities can’t afford the real costs of research, they may offer fewer positions or reduce lab funding. The long-term impact? Fewer medical breakthroughs, slower innovation, and weakened research infrastructure.
Indirect costs aren’t just administrative overhead; they are what keep research running. Without them, universities will be forced to cut back on research. This threatens the entire ecosystem of federally funded research, putting the U.S.'s leadership in science and medicine at risk.
Wait, what? NIH is slashing indirect cost rates to 15%? Many universities and medical centers currently operate with 50-70% indirect rates, which cover essential infrastructure—lab space, grant administration, IT, and compliance. Most of these institutions simply don't have extra money.
4) This all assumes all federal departments/grants will switch to this 15%; I've only seen NIH do this at this point.
5) And this does NOT take into account the threat to cancel large numbers of grants.
