Consider a scene from last night’s episode, wherein Dr. Langdon (Patrick Ball) and Dr. Whitaker (Gerran Howell) are in the break room. Langdon is vaguely mocking Whitaker’s farm boy origins by referencing the movie “Babe.”
“Can you cut the shit?” Whitaker says. “The sarcasm thing? The little buddy routine, like you’re what, you’re the Skipper and I’m Gilligan?”
Langdon is taken aback. “Ok so who am I?”
“Play whatever part you want,” comes the response, “just don’t pick mine for me.”
Someone posted a clip of the scene and said: “What is this argument?”
Someone else chimed in: “Literally came out of nowhere and I had no idea what they were talking about. There’s barely even subtext here, like wtf was this?”
OK, this is telling me a lot about these viewers.
First, you need to understand the pop cultural references, both to “Babe” and “Gilligan’s Island.”
You also need to pick up on the fact that Langdon is being mildly patronizing by bringing up Whitaker’s farming background, as if that makes him less sophisticated. A hick. It’s a subtle dig that Whitaker maybe doesn’t quite belong there. That’s an importance class nuance that some viewers are clearly missing.
You also need to understand the character dynamics on “Gilligan’s Island,” and that the title character was specifically portrayed as a hapless goof.
I get it if this went over the head of younger viewers. But that doesn’t mean it’s a poorly written scene; it means you need a deeper pop cultural literacy to appreciate it. This isn’t unusual. I watch things all the time where I don’t immediately know what’s being referenced; the amazing thing about the internet is you can look it up and learn something.
So, to the question: What is this argument?
Well, let’s think about it. Langdon has been gone from the ER for a year. This is his first day back. His memory of Whitaker — his mental picture of Whitaker — is of the overwhelmed guy he met struggling through his first day in the job. He hasn’t seen Whitaker grow and gain confidence, so that “old” picture is shaping some of the casually patronizing energy Langdon is giving off.
And Whitaker, who has become more self-assured, tells him to knock it off.
Langdon was the cocky swaggering big dog of Season 1 before Robby confronted him and kicked him out of the emergency room. Post-rehab, Langdon has returned with a certain amount of humility. But other old habits die hard; though he’s spent his workday apologizing to people he’s wronged, he hasn’t stopped to consider that he doesn’t actually know some of his colleagues at all, because he hasn’t been working side-by-side with them for the past year. It’s yet another way in which he’s being humbled.
We learn something about both Langdon and Whitaker in that moment. That’s character development.
Maybe there’s another layer.
Langdon is tall and has conventionally attractive looks, whereas Whitaker is short. We know society likes to dismiss short men. Whitaker is a nice looking guy, too! But, more often than not, the Langdon’s of the world are treated as the ideal — more authoritative and deserving of respect. So maybe that’s some of the subtext too: Just because you’ve moved through life as s “golden boy” doesn’t mean you can talk down to me.
We *should* critique screenwriting that isn’t doing necessary character and world-building
And yet maybe there’s also a conspicuous expectation among certain audiences that every detail be explained and addressed in full
But audiences need to bring media literacy to the table! C'mon people!