Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Jess Hagman

How Can Generative AI (GenAI) Enhance or Hinder Qualitative Studies? A Critical Appraisal from South Asia, Nepal Qualitative researchers can benefit from using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), such as different versions of ChatGPT—GPT-3.5 or GPT-4, Google Bard—now renamed as a Gemini, and Bing Chat—no...

This one too: nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol29/is.... Not a fan.

4 days ago 1 0 0 0
The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development Theory development is an important component of academic research since it can lead to the acquisition of new knowledge, the development of a field of study, and the formation of theoretical foundatio...

Article link. It's OA nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol28/is...

4 days ago 0 0 1 0
Screenshot of a full text PDF article on The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development. At the top of the page is an ad-like link image headlined >90% AI Coding Accuracy. It has an image of the AILYZE software.

Screenshot of a full text PDF article on The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development. At the top of the page is an ad-like link image headlined >90% AI Coding Accuracy. It has an image of the AILYZE software.

This...ad(?) for an AI QDA analysis tool...is at the top of a PDF of an article about AI for #qualitative analysis. #CAQDAS

4 days ago 0 0 1 0

Congratulations!! Looking forward to learning more about your work soon!

1 week ago 1 0 0 0

Hello #qualitative folks - hope you can join us next week! #caqdas #qdas

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Humanities Methods in Librarianship, a new, no-fee open access journal, is pleased to
announce our first call for papers! We are seeking scholarship, book reviews, and creative
non-fiction that explore librarianship through the varied methodological lenses of the
humanities. For more details about the journal, see our Issue 0 editorial.
Examples of possible contributions include (but are not limited to):
• Explorations of the concept(s) of ‘library’, ‘librarians’, or ‘librarianship’
, especially
as they relate to humanities disciplines (religion, history, literature, political theory,
etc.)

Humanities Methods in Librarianship, a new, no-fee open access journal, is pleased to announce our first call for papers! We are seeking scholarship, book reviews, and creative non-fiction that explore librarianship through the varied methodological lenses of the humanities. For more details about the journal, see our Issue 0 editorial. Examples of possible contributions include (but are not limited to): • Explorations of the concept(s) of ‘library’, ‘librarians’, or ‘librarianship’ , especially as they relate to humanities disciplines (religion, history, literature, political theory, etc.)

Disciplinary investigations of topics significant to librarianship. Examples might
include: cultural studies interpretations of library policies or debates; philosophical
analyses of librarianship; or art history perspectives on library imagery or
architecture
• Humanistic analyses of library-related practices and infrastructures, such as
theories of bibliographic description, classification, library technology, or library
spaces
• Autoethnographic scholarship, oral histories, or interviews related to librarians or
library workers

Disciplinary investigations of topics significant to librarianship. Examples might include: cultural studies interpretations of library policies or debates; philosophical analyses of librarianship; or art history perspectives on library imagery or architecture • Humanistic analyses of library-related practices and infrastructures, such as theories of bibliographic description, classification, library technology, or library spaces • Autoethnographic scholarship, oral histories, or interviews related to librarians or library workers

We also seek to publish book reviews on a broad array of topics that are relevant to the
humanities, whether non-fiction or fiction.
We invite you to contribute your work, and we look forward to your submissions! Our
submissions page has more details about our requirements.
Please submit by April 24, 2026 to be considered for our first issue. Articles will be
published on a preliminary rolling basis as they are ready. We expect to announce the full
publication of Issue 1 in summer or fall 2026.
Humanities Methods in Librarianship is published by the City University of New York, with an editorial board from across
the United States and Canada.

We also seek to publish book reviews on a broad array of topics that are relevant to the humanities, whether non-fiction or fiction. We invite you to contribute your work, and we look forward to your submissions! Our submissions page has more details about our requirements. Please submit by April 24, 2026 to be considered for our first issue. Articles will be published on a preliminary rolling basis as they are ready. We expect to announce the full publication of Issue 1 in summer or fall 2026. Humanities Methods in Librarianship is published by the City University of New York, with an editorial board from across the United States and Canada.

CFP: Humanities Methods in Librarianship, Issue 1

• Explorations of concepts re: ‘library’, ‘librarians’, ‘librarianship’
• Disciplinary investigations of LIS
• Humanistic analyses of LIS practices/infrastructures
• Autoethnographies, oral histories, interviews

cuny.manifoldapp.org/read/call-fo...

1 month ago 9 11 0 2

I know it's spring in the midwest, etc but the repeated 50 degree temperature swings are getting tiresome.

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
CFP - Library Trends 75.3 Evidence-based Practices for eLearning in Libraries CFP – Library Trends 75.3 Evidence-based Practices for eLearning in Information Organizations Library Trends invites proposals for issue on Evidence-based Practices for eLearning in Information Orga...

Excited to share our newest CFP! Library Trends 75.3: Evidence-based Practices for eLearning in Information Organizations

Proposals are due April 3, 2026. The complete CFP, including information on how to submit a proposal, is available at tinyurl.com/mwk429vh

1 month ago 1 2 0 0
Advertisement

With both AI haters & zealots flooding the zone with increasingly troll-ish posts, it's easy to forget most folks here are normal about the technology. Here's a thread of "normal folks posting about AI" that I enjoyed: 1/n

1 month ago 31 15 2 2
Keep calm and be transparent: advice from scientists who retracted their papers Retractions correct the scientific record, but they have stigma attached to them. Some in the research community want that to change.

We're thrilled to announce the Ctrl-Z Award, a US$2,500 prize for researchers “who discover substantial errors in their published work and take meaningful steps to correct the scientific record."
Covered by @nature.com today; read more here: centerforscientificintegrity.org/2026/03/10/a...

1 month ago 471 194 6 22

Hi #Skybrarians #AcademicSky #ResearchSky - it looks like I'm going to be trying to organize social activities for a virtual conference. Do you have any experiences where this has worked well, as attendee or organizer? 📚

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Also, not for nothing, but the more places that use them, the harder the make it on actual reference chat staff who then get treated like bots on chat and even sometimes phone because people will refuse to believe we’re real and treat us like humans. Infuriating every time.

1 month ago 20 6 3 1
Preview
Announcing the Spring 2026 Presentations on Qualitative Data Analysis IASSIST is an international organization of professionals working in and with information technology and data services to support research and teaching in the social sciences and beyond.

Hello #qualitative folks! @iassistdata.bsky.social is once again hosting a series on qual data analysis practices and technology: iassistdata.org/blog/2026/03.... Hope to see you there. #caqdas #QDA #qual

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Can AI Replace Social Science Researchers? No. No it can't. Come on, now.

Fantastic work from @davekarpf.bsky.social putting some perspective on the notion that AI can do social science research. It can generate passable journal articles, which is not necessarily the same thing. It's a chance to consider what we should be valuing. davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/can-ai-rep...

1 month ago 48 18 2 3

When people have asked me about thoughts on AI & qualitative data, this has been at the top of my list. Sobering to see proof of concept.
Lots of research needed on what (de-identified?) human subject data we can still publish under which conditions.

1 month ago 4 2 0 0
Advertisement

Can ChatGPT generate me a file with all the references from a bibliography I have in word? I tried this out because I'd heard from multiple sources that it could, and I teach and use software for managing references, and this would be a really useful thing to be able to do. #medlibs (thread)

2 months ago 34 17 10 8
Slide: Researchers and AI: Survey Findings

Text: OXFORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS
Researchers and Al: Survey Findings
aby Boomers & Gen X have a larger proportion of 'Pioneers', whereas Millennials have a larger proportion of 'Challengers'
% of each researcher profile per generation

*bar graph: baby boomers and Gen X both described as 8% “challengers”; for millennials, the number is 17%*

It should be noted that 'generation' was not asked directly; it was calculated using reported age. The sample is smaller as the 40-49 years' age category cut across the generation bands and was therefore excluded from this reporting.
The remaining groups were categorized into broad generational bands using the following age categories:
Millennials: Up to 39 years
Generation X: 50 - 59 years
Baby Boomers: 60 - 79 years
Silent Generation: 80+ years
N=1,416
14

Slide: Researchers and AI: Survey Findings Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings aby Boomers & Gen X have a larger proportion of 'Pioneers', whereas Millennials have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per generation *bar graph: baby boomers and Gen X both described as 8% “challengers”; for millennials, the number is 17%* It should be noted that 'generation' was not asked directly; it was calculated using reported age. The sample is smaller as the 40-49 years' age category cut across the generation bands and was therefore excluded from this reporting. The remaining groups were categorized into broad generational bands using the following age categories: Millennials: Up to 39 years Generation X: 50 - 59 years Baby Boomers: 60 - 79 years Silent Generation: 80+ years N=1,416 14

Slide: Researchers and AI: survey findings.  Text: OXFORD
UNIVERSITY PRESS
Researchers and Al: Survey Findings
Early Career Researchers have a larger proportion of 'Challengers'
% of each researcher profile per career stage
 
*bar graph giving breakdown of percentage of early-career vs. mid- and late-career academic attitudes. 16% or ECRs are designated “challengers” vs
12% (mid) and 8% (late)*

Generally across career stages there are similar proportions of each researcher profile, the exception being a larger proportion of 'Challengers' in the Early Career Research category, compared to other career stages.
Career Stage was based on self-reported categorization of 'early, 'mid", or late.
N=2,088
15

Slide: Researchers and AI: survey findings. Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings Early Career Researchers have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per career stage *bar graph giving breakdown of percentage of early-career vs. mid- and late-career academic attitudes. 16% or ECRs are designated “challengers” vs 12% (mid) and 8% (late)* Generally across career stages there are similar proportions of each researcher profile, the exception being a larger proportion of 'Challengers' in the Early Career Research category, compared to other career stages. Career Stage was based on self-reported categorization of 'early, 'mid", or late. N=2,088 15

Interesting survey on attitudes toward AI among academics. One thing that struck me: millennials (vs Gen X and boomers) and early-career researchers are *more* likely to distrust AI. fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...

2 months ago 75 25 11 4

...after thinking more about using mental models in the @carpentries.carpentries.org instructor training.

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

I've always struggled with how to talk about #qda in an hour given the huge range of ways that people do qual work. But I've found it helpful to make use of a couple of mental models of the research process, types of qualitative quality, and levels of analysis strategies...

2 months ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
LibGuides: Qualitative Data Analysis: Planning Your Analysis Resources on conducting qualitative data analysis

New slides and recording of my workshop on planning #Qualitative data analysis.

2 months ago 1 0 1 0

@benpatrickwill.bsky.social @emilymbender.bsky.social @cfiesler.bsky.social

2 months ago 1 1 0 0

I suspected it was a publisher platform issue. Thanks for confirming

2 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

the set design and choreography was so beautiful that it was irrelevant that I’m a dummy who can’t understand Spanish

2 months ago 3493 232 43 24

New plan: every time I feel despair about politics, go search for whatever Mamdani is up to that day.

2 months ago 2 1 0 0

I want to read pretty much everything in @criticalai-journal.bsky.social but there doesn't seem to be a PDF or other full text download option. Reader view and print to PDFs are not formatted well either. What am I missing?

2 months ago 2 0 1 0

Exciting looking cfp for #qualitative researchers

2 months ago 3 2 0 0

😭😭😭😭😭😭

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 8 Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research.

ooh, yay, new @zotero.org! www.zotero.org/blog/zotero-8/

2 months ago 0 0 0 1

#qualitative

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

#qualitative

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement