Posts by Jess Hagman
Screenshot of a full text PDF article on The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Qualitative Research for Theory Development. At the top of the page is an ad-like link image headlined >90% AI Coding Accuracy. It has an image of the AILYZE software.
This...ad(?) for an AI QDA analysis tool...is at the top of a PDF of an article about AI for #qualitative analysis. #CAQDAS
Congratulations!! Looking forward to learning more about your work soon!
Hello #qualitative folks - hope you can join us next week! #caqdas #qdas
Humanities Methods in Librarianship, a new, no-fee open access journal, is pleased to announce our first call for papers! We are seeking scholarship, book reviews, and creative non-fiction that explore librarianship through the varied methodological lenses of the humanities. For more details about the journal, see our Issue 0 editorial. Examples of possible contributions include (but are not limited to): • Explorations of the concept(s) of ‘library’, ‘librarians’, or ‘librarianship’ , especially as they relate to humanities disciplines (religion, history, literature, political theory, etc.)
Disciplinary investigations of topics significant to librarianship. Examples might include: cultural studies interpretations of library policies or debates; philosophical analyses of librarianship; or art history perspectives on library imagery or architecture • Humanistic analyses of library-related practices and infrastructures, such as theories of bibliographic description, classification, library technology, or library spaces • Autoethnographic scholarship, oral histories, or interviews related to librarians or library workers
We also seek to publish book reviews on a broad array of topics that are relevant to the humanities, whether non-fiction or fiction. We invite you to contribute your work, and we look forward to your submissions! Our submissions page has more details about our requirements. Please submit by April 24, 2026 to be considered for our first issue. Articles will be published on a preliminary rolling basis as they are ready. We expect to announce the full publication of Issue 1 in summer or fall 2026. Humanities Methods in Librarianship is published by the City University of New York, with an editorial board from across the United States and Canada.
CFP: Humanities Methods in Librarianship, Issue 1
• Explorations of concepts re: ‘library’, ‘librarians’, ‘librarianship’
• Disciplinary investigations of LIS
• Humanistic analyses of LIS practices/infrastructures
• Autoethnographies, oral histories, interviews
cuny.manifoldapp.org/read/call-fo...
I know it's spring in the midwest, etc but the repeated 50 degree temperature swings are getting tiresome.
Excited to share our newest CFP! Library Trends 75.3: Evidence-based Practices for eLearning in Information Organizations
Proposals are due April 3, 2026. The complete CFP, including information on how to submit a proposal, is available at tinyurl.com/mwk429vh
With both AI haters & zealots flooding the zone with increasingly troll-ish posts, it's easy to forget most folks here are normal about the technology. Here's a thread of "normal folks posting about AI" that I enjoyed: 1/n
We're thrilled to announce the Ctrl-Z Award, a US$2,500 prize for researchers “who discover substantial errors in their published work and take meaningful steps to correct the scientific record."
Covered by @nature.com today; read more here: centerforscientificintegrity.org/2026/03/10/a...
Hi #Skybrarians #AcademicSky #ResearchSky - it looks like I'm going to be trying to organize social activities for a virtual conference. Do you have any experiences where this has worked well, as attendee or organizer? 📚
Also, not for nothing, but the more places that use them, the harder the make it on actual reference chat staff who then get treated like bots on chat and even sometimes phone because people will refuse to believe we’re real and treat us like humans. Infuriating every time.
Hello #qualitative folks! @iassistdata.bsky.social is once again hosting a series on qual data analysis practices and technology: iassistdata.org/blog/2026/03.... Hope to see you there. #caqdas #QDA #qual
Fantastic work from @davekarpf.bsky.social putting some perspective on the notion that AI can do social science research. It can generate passable journal articles, which is not necessarily the same thing. It's a chance to consider what we should be valuing. davekarpf.beehiiv.com/p/can-ai-rep...
When people have asked me about thoughts on AI & qualitative data, this has been at the top of my list. Sobering to see proof of concept.
Lots of research needed on what (de-identified?) human subject data we can still publish under which conditions.
Can ChatGPT generate me a file with all the references from a bibliography I have in word? I tried this out because I'd heard from multiple sources that it could, and I teach and use software for managing references, and this would be a really useful thing to be able to do. #medlibs (thread)
Slide: Researchers and AI: Survey Findings Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings aby Boomers & Gen X have a larger proportion of 'Pioneers', whereas Millennials have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per generation *bar graph: baby boomers and Gen X both described as 8% “challengers”; for millennials, the number is 17%* It should be noted that 'generation' was not asked directly; it was calculated using reported age. The sample is smaller as the 40-49 years' age category cut across the generation bands and was therefore excluded from this reporting. The remaining groups were categorized into broad generational bands using the following age categories: Millennials: Up to 39 years Generation X: 50 - 59 years Baby Boomers: 60 - 79 years Silent Generation: 80+ years N=1,416 14
Slide: Researchers and AI: survey findings. Text: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Researchers and Al: Survey Findings Early Career Researchers have a larger proportion of 'Challengers' % of each researcher profile per career stage *bar graph giving breakdown of percentage of early-career vs. mid- and late-career academic attitudes. 16% or ECRs are designated “challengers” vs 12% (mid) and 8% (late)* Generally across career stages there are similar proportions of each researcher profile, the exception being a larger proportion of 'Challengers' in the Early Career Research category, compared to other career stages. Career Stage was based on self-reported categorization of 'early, 'mid", or late. N=2,088 15
Interesting survey on attitudes toward AI among academics. One thing that struck me: millennials (vs Gen X and boomers) and early-career researchers are *more* likely to distrust AI. fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/...
...after thinking more about using mental models in the @carpentries.carpentries.org instructor training.
I've always struggled with how to talk about #qda in an hour given the huge range of ways that people do qual work. But I've found it helpful to make use of a couple of mental models of the research process, types of qualitative quality, and levels of analysis strategies...
New slides and recording of my workshop on planning #Qualitative data analysis.
@benpatrickwill.bsky.social @emilymbender.bsky.social @cfiesler.bsky.social
I suspected it was a publisher platform issue. Thanks for confirming
the set design and choreography was so beautiful that it was irrelevant that I’m a dummy who can’t understand Spanish
New plan: every time I feel despair about politics, go search for whatever Mamdani is up to that day.
I want to read pretty much everything in @criticalai-journal.bsky.social but there doesn't seem to be a PDF or other full text download option. Reader view and print to PDFs are not formatted well either. What am I missing?
Exciting looking cfp for #qualitative researchers
😭😭😭😭😭😭