To me the qualitative difference is that we are talking about a whole media. Not the content itself, like in movies.
Maybe that’s also where Eikos sense of accepting defeat comes from. For movies we declare certain content as off limits. For social media it’s legislative capitulation, no nuance
Posts by
Auch interessant ist Haidts Kommunikation an üblichen wissenschaftlichen Kanälen vorbei. Bücher, GoogleDocs, Blogposts und Tedtalks statt peer-reviewte Artikel. Interessanter Artikel dazu: archive.is/EPrii
Eher nur eindeutig wenn man selektiv zitiert wie Haidt es gerne tut. Verkauft dann aber gut Bücher. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
🎙️Screen Sense - new podcast with me and @shuhbillskee.bsky.social, is launching next week! Two psychologists (and dads) talking honestly about what it means to raise a family in a screen-filled world - with science, real stories and zero guilt. Launching 13th June. screensensepodcast.substack.com
We’re back to the “hundreds of psychological studies cannot all be wrong, educate yourself”-stage of discourse.
I recommend that onlookers to this discourse pick some of the cited studies & see how compelling they find them, wrt causal identification & strength of statistical evidence.>
But their origin does not change that they are underspecified. They allow for many interpretations and no way of knowing what people agreed to.
Some positive aspects: increase in mental health, social connectedness, support, coping, exploration of self and interests, access to information
The use of „can“ in formulating the causal claims makes it quite hard to disagree. Smartphones can impair mental health, but the actual debate is whether they do so more than not. Esp. since the majority of experts actually think effects are context dependent
A shame no positive effects are asked..
Take the time to read this important analysis. We are in exactly the situation that laws, Constitutin and basic common sense should prevent. And yet.
www.techdirt.com/2025/02/05/t...
There's a word for people who prefer phones to meeting friends: addicts Martha Gill Ditching hanging out for isolated scrolling on our sofas is a dangerous habit that warrants help on a par with gambling Guardian article by Martha Gill
Counterpoint: No, there isn't
But sure, let's randomly assign incredibly loaded clinical diagnoses onto individuals who may have many valid reasons for not wanting to engage in-person with people, particularly ones who make damning evidence-free judgements of others and share them in a newspaper
New post on The 100% CI: I read @jonathanhaidt.bsky.social's and @lucyfoulkes.bsky.social's book on the alleged teen mental health crisis and social media's role in it. Then, I tried to make up my own mind, with limited success.
www.the100.ci/2024/12/10/t...
Thanks Andy! In @theatlantic.bsky.social I describe why the panic over smartphones is more likely to distract from than solve the problems that young people are facing today. Gift link is below:
www.theatlantic.com/technology/a...
Incredible! Could also work well for counseling