Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Susan Cilone

Exactly. Now you understand why 3000 people stood outside the courthouse cheering when the verdict was announced. The support was always about the injustice. It was frightening to watch.

9 months ago 4 0 0 0

Verdict is in. Free Karen Read.
Bring in the Jury.
Karen Read Trial

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

Understood. Right there with you.

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

We will wait for you!

10 months ago 3 0 1 0

Great point! Yes.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

Exactly.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

At every turn, the CW doubles down on their persecution of KR. You are right.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

Karen Read Trial
How can the jury trust the CW evidence when:
1. Shoe mislabeled bag incident
2. Dog DNA evidence was mentioned, but never brought into evidence.
3. Shirt-hole lies
If you can not present the evidence without chain of custody issues,
tampering issues, and lies during the trial…

10 months ago 13 3 4 0

Hank’s closing:
In real life, details matter. Inevitably, you need peer reviewed documents. You must consider the DNA that was not found or presented and ignore Dr. Laposata, Dr. Wolfe and the ham sandwich Dr. Rentschler ate last year.Also, you have to wonder why Randy’s arm was not blue.
#KarenRead

10 months ago 7 0 3 0

Thank you, Dr. Rentschler. Thank you, Dr. Laposata. Thank you, Dr. Wolf. Thank you, Dr. Russell.
The science doesn’t lie. (Hank does) John was not hit by a car. A car did not hit John. #KarenRead is innocent. Bring in the jury!

10 months ago 18 3 1 0
Advertisement

The qualities of a good prosecutor are as elusive and as impossible to define as those which mark a gentleman. And those who need to be told
would not understand it anyway. The Federal Prosecutor
April 1, 1940
Robert H. Jackson
#HankBrennan will never understand!

10 months ago 1 0 0 1

Hank Brennan, stop lying! You have lied from the moment you stepped into the Karen Read trial. I am not buying your mistake, Hank. You are a vile embarrassment

10 months ago 32 4 1 0

Yes, you should dig in. This is unlike any other trial. Catch up, we will wait for you.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

Yes. Ironic, but not surprising. They had just returned from a funeral/memorial for fallen officers they had never met. The respect is…expected.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

I have been following this case for a year and a half. I can’t look away. Karen Read is all of us, and I can not stop watching until she is found not guilty. They have no case, but they are going all in.

10 months ago 7 0 1 0

Agree!

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

ipse dixit Welcher has no idea he was using data from the wrong key cycle. When your ego stands in the way, you just might get blue grease paint all over your arm. Karen Read Trial, Day 22

10 months ago 9 1 0 0

Love your snark, butter biscuit. ❤️

11 months ago 1 0 0 0
Post image

Endless thoughts on the Karen Read Trial. Today: Have you asked yourself where two military/police veterans would leave John’s body? A fallen cop.
Under a flag pole?

11 months ago 7 1 2 0

The defense.

11 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

That is where I believe Higgins was. If he stood near or in the breezeway door to the garage, he could have easily ambushed John just as he tried to go in the house. Pull John into the garage and several people and a dog jump him. Fits the evidence. John was not hit by a car. Keep watching.

11 months ago 2 0 0 0

Watching. Following since pre-trial motions prior to Trial 1.0

11 months ago 0 0 0 0

Karen is any one of us. If this can happen to her, it can happen to anyone. Watch the trial, learn the facts. She did not hit John with her car. The MSP did not investigate, they accused her and then orchestrated a narrative. This is bigger than Karen. You should care.

11 months ago 1 0 0 0

Reasonable doubt is abundant. It will become clear that a car did not hit John. At that point, you know she is factually innocent.

11 months ago 3 0 1 0

Trial 2.0 is off to a fiery start. The witnesses seem to be modifying their testimony in triplicate. Impeachment is the word for day 1. ARCCA voice dire is very important. They prove John was not hit by a car.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Watching. I watched first trial and all hearings. I have been following since January of 2024.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Not guilty. A car did not hit John OKeefe.

1 year ago 7 0 0 0
Preview
A whistleblower's disclosure details how DOGE may have taken sensitive labor data A whistleblower tells Congress and NPR that DOGE may have taken sensitive labor data and hid its tracks. "None of that ... information should ever leave the agency," said a former NLRB official.

"Within minutes after DOGE accessed the NLRB's systems, someone with an IP address in Russia started trying to log in. The attempts were 'near real-time'...

"Whoever was attempting to log in was using one of the newly created DOGE accounts..."

www.npr.org/2025/04/15/n...

1 year ago 9015 4738 561 451
Advertisement

Thank you!

1 year ago 2 0 0 0

Yes, the trial will be televised. Many lawtubers will cover it as well as CourtTV. When you watch the trial, it will be clear that she did not hit John.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0