and if you say 'well i don't love johnny depp' well, then, what it really means is that at your core you hate women, so, you know, it's a bad look for you all the way. you're a loser on every proposition.

and all this for what? an actor? who cares? was he a good actor? yeah i guess. but he's just an actor. and frankly i wouldn't care even if he was the best actor ever, or he rescued puppies for a living.

my guy, johnny depp is a fucking monster. i get it. you love his movies. you think he's quirky or cute or whatever. but he is a fucking monster and abuser. i'm super sorry you bought into all the shit that the PR firm he hired put out, but her actions do not negate HIS actions.

are they just out of frame, laughing with you?

You have no business trying to dunk on someone like this. Not after you tried to weaponize your disabilities to shield yourself from criticism.

Besides, you haven't yet once backed up any of your claims with anything other than 'my ex-lawyer therapist friend told me'.

Probably both! Jollibee has some very dedicated fans and I'm sure the 14 promo is gonna double that up at least.

You really, really have a hyper-warped view of who and what lawyers are, and it's starting to become less ha-ha funny and more 'this is actually quite disturbing'.

when you say that all lawyers are lying scumbags who are only interested in draining money from their clients and lie to everyone everywhere all the time.

I don't subscribe to your 'truths', particularly when you're trying to paint an entire profession with a brush that just sounds so cartoonish.

Besides, I'm not here to change your mind. You want to believe lawyers are the scum of the earth? You do you. I'm just telling you, you don't sound rational

Your antipathy towards lawyers is almost comical. It's like you've only experienced the practice of law through media, because you seem to be firmly planted in this idea of what being a lawyer is, and it sounds like a compilation of ever bad lawyer in every media ever.

I'm not DEFENDING him, I'm just pointing out that HE was the victim at the hands of a LYING FEMALE MONSTER.

but the 'big tent' /s

maybe the tent is big, but there should be people at the entryways

The sheer irony of a person with the last name Gonzales tweeting this... I hate it.

Man, sure love knowing the work I do to enable people who can't afford legal services to obtain them is a 'hobby'. If only I were out in the field, making things with my hands.

I mean, he hasn't even issued a full-throated apology for the tattoo! For the remarks about sexual assault! For the use of the word "retard"!

Basic things I would expect of a decent person, no matter their political leanings (unless those leanings were, you know, pro-those things).

People say "But he's leftist NOW" and yet he hasn't actually done anything substantial to acknowledge his past? In fact he's actively tried to lie about it? Multiple times? In multiple ways?

That is Trump-style lying. That is NOT GOOD.

for her. If she bought a bottle of tequila and drank it in the privacy of her own home and had the same amount, would we say she wasn't doing it willingly? I wouldn't. The fault lies with the bartenders for not doing what they should have done.

--well before even the eighth shot of tequila. That is absolutely on them. I'm not even saying she did anything wrong. The fact that the service didn't have (or ignored) those safety considerations is extremely troubling. And it would be even more so, if someone else had been getting those shots

She wasn't being forced or coerced, unless I'm mistaken. Her judgment was impaired (obviously!) but unless someone else was ordering those shots for her, then, yes, I would say willingly does really convey what happened.

And yes, I very much agree that the bartenders should have cut her off--

20 trees, some 30+ years old, plus the ugly-ass fence, plus potentially violating her property lines? Treble damages hits real, real hard.

Quite possibly. I don't know how that would fly legally, but ethically and as a matter of safety for your customers, I would agree.

I was browsing the other site (not for this) but I saw a lot of takes that blamed her, and like... yeah, okay, she did willingly consume 15 shots of tequila but the bartenders did have an obligation to cut her off.

It's amazing what a promo night will do.

Depending on the amount of money involved, I'd build my dream arcade. And set it up as a haven for after school kids etc. Probably include other-gaming spaces as well, if we're going for the moon.

A 'lot of people'? Is this like the 'number of women' who agree with you?

Where are they? This is an open forum. Surely they'd be chiming in too?

Surely you're not the lone defender of 'truth' out there, demanding photographic evidence, recorded actions, in 4K, oh and can I download it for later?

Not only power, but supposed maturity. As a married man, as a person in a position of authority, the duty fell on HIM to not fuck around.

No one has argued that women can't, don't, or won't be sexually aggressive.

And also, that doesn't matter a fucking whit to the subject at hand.

Even if it were 'just' cheating--serial cheating--the blame still falls on HIM. Because, ultimately, he is the one in the position of power.

I find this guy's mental yoga morbidly fascinating. Just twisting himself in knots to blame women.

Do YOU know anything about defamation law?

This is a rhetorical question--I can already tell you don't know anything about it.

Funny you talk about threats and intimidation, though. That would be the tactic of his lawyers, who were sending C&Ds to women as far back as last year.

Oh? Do you have evidence of these women? Can you prove they exist?

Or, like you, should I deny their existence because they're not in front of me right now, saying it?