Of course it’s unintentional on his part. He was just fooled by (((the elites))) hiding in the shadows and using their money to control and manipulate good, honest people.
Posts by Samuel ✡️ 🗽
“It wasn’t my fault, (((they))) just misled us all and stabbed us in the back!”
Sounds like a keeper
Twitter won’t let you search for staged assassination attempt
Everywhere: that assassination attempt was almost certainly staged.
Twitter:
What happens on May 2?
But that 91% Dem year didn’t even reset the trend: it picked up in 2024 proportional to what it had done in 2012 and 2016.
Your graph is essentially proving my point. 2024 was following the same pattern as the 2012 and 2016 elections had, where Muslim voters trend back toward the GOP. 2020 is an outlier, and given the circumstances of the Pandemic that’s not terribly surprising.
Also, this graph literally doesn’t even back your point. Democrats “won” the Muslim vote after 9/11 pushed them out of the GOP, but in each election after 2008 a larger share moved back to the Republicans, which coincides with the Democrats moving left on social issues.
Wait, you mean JD Vance’s smoky eye isn’t enough to get the job done!?!
Don’t get bombed, don’t give up your nuclear program, don’t release your hold on Hormuz, and wait while the rest of the world becomes ever more desperate for a resolution and furious at Trump for not providing one
The thing is, if you’re Iran, endless ceasefires while economic pressure mounts seems pretty close to ideal
“The EU’s highest court has found Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ law to be discriminatory, stigmatising and in breach of basic democratic values…”
This is a crucial decision. The court rejected the political claim that LGBTQ+ representation is “propaganda.” We must keep fighting politics that dehumanise us.
Cool. Now show a graph that includes the years I’m actually talking about.
Likely unintentionally, but that you’re not aware of how your behavior is dictated and defined by Christian tradition and you’d rather be a sneering know-it-all than learn about things you don’t understand just underscores the importance of religious studies and comparative religion in school.
social and psychological development
The way you use the word “religion”, which is a word derived from Christian tradition and doesn’t actually accurately describe many cultural traditions of worship around the world, is indicative of a Christian-centric framing to the conversation.
for this is because you were raised in a Western nation where Christianity has been intrinsically entwined with the cultural tradition for over a thousand years, and you’re neither educated nor curious enough to reflect on the downstream effects that such a cultural entwinement has on your own
You literally talk about atheism using the same language and terminology that Christians use to describe religion.
YOUR belief is the one that is correct, and supersedes all others, and that grants you both moral certainty and moral superiority over those who do not know The Truth™.
The reason
who expects to have even a baseline understanding of how and why people behave the way they do.
it and the ideas it contains. Given the enormous percentage of human behavior that is driven by religious belief, understanding how those messages are translated, how they change over time, how they are interpreted by different people, and how they influence choice is ENORMOUSLY important to anyone
The fact that you don’t even understand what I mean when I say “comparison religion” and “religious studies” is emblematic of why I’m right.
The Bible IS literature, you raging dumbass. It’s extremely influential literature, which is why it’s so important to understand the way people interact with
IDK, I bet that would work in Maine…
expanding the Church’s authority to dictate life to people living within the bounds of “Christendom”, which is what Europeans named Europe at the time.
The way people casually use this imagery, as if it’s just a cooler more stylized cross is incredibly creepy, and historically illiterate.
It was about spreading the dominance of Christianity and Papal Authority, almost exclusively.
Individual crusaders did have individual motivations, some pious, some cynical, some bloodthirsty, some profit-seeking, but overall the Crusades were about spreading the influence of the Church, and
Yeah that’s a room that I’d walk out of.
Crusader history isn’t my area or specific focus, but it’s not particularly distant and while it wasn’t explicitly about killing non-Christians (though that was certainly its effect), I’d argue the actual “purpose” was far more dangerous:
It’s not the Democrats’ stance on social issues that drove Muslim voters to them, it was just the racism of Republicans.
That’s a cool Wikipedia screenshot, but 78% of American Muslims still voted for George W Bush in the 2000 election, largely citing his stance on various social issues and similar majorities voted for Republicans in earlier elections.
For people who want to donate to support Palestinians who need it, there are many sources through which to do so that aren’t random social media bot accounts that may or may not be a scam or outright Hamas fundraising.
www.pcrf.net and www.wfp.org and wck.org all are excellent options.
I had no idea that grifting dipshit left, but that’s great news. Now maybe we’ll stop getting tagged 15 times a day by “Mamoud’s Family”, Variant #592.
It’s totally just a software engineer in Gaza buying accounts and making bots to spam his requests for aid, and not a scam of any kind.
It’s always hilarious to see you Cultural Christians making this statement, being completely incapable of examining the ideas at play just within that statement.
Comparative religion and religious studies should be mandatory parts of every school curriculum, you guys sound so ridiculous 😂
People like you are the reason that George W Bush got elected in 2000.
You’re not electing the President to be your fucking drinking buddy. You’re choosing a person to do a specific job. Who you “like” is the least relevant factor imaginable.