Wow! Very cool. Congrats Will!!

...Fantastic reason to bring some 🍰 to the office..?

I have 1-2 of these interfaces open pretty much every day -- they remain completely unintuitive. And don't even get me started on the search functions to select reviewers...

Oooh. This is smart! I'll give it a try! Thanks.

OMG. I came across this post randomly this morning, just as I was having the same issue (again)!

My current method is to use my WebID login, but that can't really be the best solution...?

Extremely normal and fine for a company to put this in a public statement

Mfw live tweeting during a global Bluesky outage...

A couple of candid, behind the scene bonus shots..

A little less proud of my karaoke performance (# post your Ls)... 😓
But VERY proud of getting up at 645 to go for a swim in the 6 degree sea. 🧜‍♂️

So... This was fun.
24h. Over 30 talks by DDC members and fellows, on topics ranging from AI chatbot to rural/urban divides, to polarizing network dynamics.

I'm particularly proud of the DDC election task force presenting initial results, assembled in just over a month of work.

It's DDC retreat time. Check out the thread below to learn about all the cool stuff happening at our Centre!

This sounds like something our toddler would say.

...our completely uncultured toddler, who is also wrong.

🥔😈

Pasta are just empty carbs anyway. Might as well just eat bread or a potato.

I think future studies would do well to try and uncover the baseline premises & imagined audiences that drive coverage, rather than just positive/negative valence.
Like the idea that "this spells trouble for Biden" vs. "Trump projects strength". Or Dems being accountable agents vs. Rs just vibing.

UPDATE:
I'm never going back! ✨🐲❤️🤴

Kind of feels like I'm cheating on my old DDC coffee mug with this new and somewhat modded-up version...

This study shows that disinformation spreads, not as “false facts”, but as narratives. Compare that to how mis- and disinformation are often operationalized in the big-N quantitative and experimental research in the Nature/Science journals — that’s a major weakness in the field.

This is excellent! Thanks to everyone involved for all the hard work you all clearly poured into it!
I'll be citing this A LOT.

Bonus insights into some of the NYT's ongoing editorial rifts:

Increasingly concerned about WWIII, I find myself checking the Paper of Record to be reassured that the Emperess's new clothes are, in fact, patriotic enough to meet the present moment.

"I'm.. making... a lasagna
...for one"

(Me, every time I cut onions.)

Nothing funny from back then has held up as much as their songs, most of which I still know by heart and think about/quote regularly.

This also makes it a much better metaphor for media markets, where social fragmentation and privatized market consolidation go hand in hand.

They are just listing things that everyone does and claiming it's specific to a demographic, so as to farm said demographic's engagement.

I refuse to believe any other explanation.

Where* are Danish politicians active, versus where* are Danish citizens?

*which regions and platforms

-> Pretty large discrepancies when it comes to X, LinkedIn, and YouTube.

With this and the other take on how AI is better at social science, it kind of seems like this person is deliberately edge-lord rage-baiting a specific Bluesky audience...?

We've been analyzing survey responses and politicians' social media accounts in the context of the Danish elections.
This allows us to place platforms on an ideological scale.

TikTok tilts to the right on the supply side (Bluesky = left).
The demand (public) side sees X as a far-right outlier.

Danish national elections analysis update: Facebook reigns supreme among candidate usage.
LinkedIn catching up.
Bluesky only for a specific subset of parties.
Tiktok and YouTube under-utilized?

Chatbots are increasingly popular as voting aids in elections. Most are not fit for this purpose.

The generational difference in use is huge. Ahead of the Danish elections, 13% say they will use chatbots for advice. That is 1 in 5 in Gen Z. And 1 in 20 amongst Boomers.

Source: @ddc-sdu.bsky.social

DDC-SURVEY: DANSKERNE VIL BRUGE CHATBOTS TIL STEMMERÅD

13 % af danskerne siger, at de vil bruge AI (som fx ChatGPT) til at finde ud af, hvem de skal stemme på.

Blandt Generation Z er det næsten 20 %.

Samtidig ved vi meget lidt om, hvordan vælgere faktisk bruger chatbots i en valgkontekst. 🧵