Tree law satisfies the part of us all that knows that killing a tree for spite is a deeply antisocial act that should result in financial penalties so heavy you flinch every time you hear a twig snap. get em girl.

Join our Polycule! | Notion Welcome! Thank you for your interest in joining our polycule. We are very open here, and wanted to share a bit about ourselves, before we learn a bit about you!

Since I know @kenwhite.bsky.social frequently opines on polycules, and is, dare I say, the foremost polycule expert in the nation… I have questions about how binding a “polycule constitution” is and the legal risks in this application process:

www.notion.so/Join-our-Pol...

Nick Rekieta in a shiny red jacket, blue shirt, and white tie.

Nick Rekeita the pornography producer?

I want to be absolutely clear:

I have chosen a side. I am against this. I am against John Eastman. I am against anyone who calls him a good man and a fine scholar. I am against anyone who defends anyone who call him a good man and a fine scholar. I will always be.

Cuck not, that ye be not cucked. For with what cuckholdry ye cuck, ye shall be cucked: and with what girth ye display, it shall be displayed to you again. And why beholdest thou the stud that is in thy brother's bed, but considerest not the bull that is in thine own bed?

Saruman with the palantir.

We talking about Kyle Rittenhouse the murderer and how it isn’t defamatory to call that murderous murderer a murderer?

Denny’s [3 stars out of 5] 3.1 (147 reviews) Payton B. said"This restaurant was amazing. Wish i could give it more stars , cause it deserves it. Most respectful server, Sam. we went and told the manager as we were walking out. The people who walked out right before us turned around when they…"read more in American, Burgers, Sandwiches

You very much could give them more stars if you wanted.

every comment section needs at least one guy just fucking losing it for no reason

I have the best clients.

Star War.

Why would Farsi-speaking Christians use an Arabic word for God?

His “I didn’t do any unlawful employment practices” shirt is raising a lot of questions otherwise answered by his shirt.

The right outfit.

Kind of odd choices for heroin. Most people choose the arm. Braver souls choose the penis.

I for one am glad we have started exiling Canadians to the moon.

oh NO.

Who would win?

The full might of American technology to project naval power globally and send astronauts to the moon

Or

One stinky boi stuck in the toilet

As one does when reading a Riddle filing.

Also, just... just because a web platform changes a public interface and you can't see things doesn't mean they've destroyed anything. It's almost like data can be saved.

In my defense, I can deduct my PACER bill as a business expense now.

(Follow up: Yes, that's a really unsatisfactory answer. Too many people equate "legal" with "moral" or think that someone pointing out that something is "legal" means that the person also thinks it's "moral." Do I think flying a swastika is moral? No. But it's legal.)

I'm not sure what it says about me that my curiosity drove me to pay for this filing.

At least it isn't us-east-1.

You may hate Amazon, but their inexpensive cloud computing infrastructure is an indispensable resource that forms the backbone of countless American small businesses.

APPELLANT’S EMERGENCY MOTION REGARDING COMPLETED EVIDENCE DESTRUCTION Appellant Justin Riddle, proceeding pro se, files this emergency motion to inform the Court that the evidence destruction predicted in Appellant’s Corrected Reply Brief, filed March 24, 2026 (ECF No. 51), has occurred, and to request immediate relief. Appellant notes that this is an emergency motion. Appellant has filed multiple emergency motions across this litigation. Each has been either ignored or denied without substantive analysis. If the word ‘emergency’ does not trigger the relief mechanism it describes, and if a different procedural vehicle exists that would result in substantive engagement with the issues presented, Appellant respectfully requests that this Court identify it—as it did when Appellant’s table of contents preceded the table of authorities.

"I keep saying my mental illness is an emergency but no one will listen to me!":

(cc: @prog-r0k.bsky.social)

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Threats? Sure, probably. As for other action, the legality is likely determined at gunpoint. They never arrested Lincoln for sending the federal army against certain states.

He didn’t make a true threat in that statement, and the government has always been legally authorized to threaten military action against other countries.

Well it wasn’t this, since I almost copied the non-threat from that case verbatim. bsky.app/profile/bran...