Full report: www.ifpi.org/wp-content/u...
Credit: IFPI, Victoria Oakley (CEO), IFPI research team. Published 18 March 2026, covering calendar 2025.
#ifpi #musicindustry
Posts by Steppa
Report's value: quantifies industry health (US$31.7B, 11th consecutive growth year) while documenting structural threats (fraud industrialising at 85% AI-gen streams). Methods transparent, limitations acknowledged. Essential data for practitioners, policymakers, researchers navigating 2026 landscape
Report documents US$31.7B aggregate but doesn't break down independent vs major infrastructure distribution. All case studies major label partnerships, where's DIY/mid-tier data? Fraud quantified (85%) but platform response timelines absent. Does physical resurgence (8.0%) match your experience?
Report profiles Tate McRae (RCA), Balu Brigada (Warner/Atlantic JV), Olivia Dean (Capitol UK/UMG), all 7-10 year development timelines from signing to breakthrough. Labels invested US$8.1B globally in A&R/marketing (2024). Artist remuneration: 35.5% of revenues (up from 31.0% in 2016).
US$31.7B milestone encouraging, but distribution matters as much as total. Fraud isn't theoretical, appears in quarterly statements as anomalies, reduced per-stream rates. Physical resurgence (8.0%) matches experience: superfans seeking tangible connections, streaming alone unsustainable mid-tier
Latin America led regional growth: +17.1%. China +20.1% (overtook Germany as #4 market). Brazil #8, Mexico #10 globally. Method: data sourced directly from IFPI member companies, verified via national groups. But fraud quantified: 60K AI-gen tracks daily (Deezer, Jan 2026), 85% fraudulent streams
Economic milestone: US$31.7B (first time surpassing US$30B), 11th consecutive growth year. Subscription streaming majority format: 52.4% of revenues, 837M paid subscribers. Physical rebounded 8.0% (faster than streaming's 7.7%)vinyl 19th year growth at 13.7%. All six regions grew (6th straight year)
Bold graphic reading Record highs feom streams, up to 85% fraudulent referencing the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) Global Music Report 2026, published 18 March 2026, showing global recorded music revenues of US$31.7 billion for calendar year 2025 (first time surpassing US$30 billion), 6.4% year-on-year growth, subscription streaming as majority format at 52.4% of revenues, 837 million paid subscribers globally, and key industry data visualizations
The @ifpiorg.bsky.social 's Global Music Report 2026 (98 pages, published 18 March, covering 2025) quantifies what many practitioners suspected: industry growth accelerating (US$31.7B, +6.4% YoY) while fraud threat industrializes (85% of AI-gen streams fraudulent). Key findings:
#musiceconomics
The $1.5B+ ticket sales Spotify drove for artists is the most underused finding for practitioners. Income that bypasses most royalty-chain intermediaries
Full report: loudandclear.byspotify.com Credit: Spotify Loud & Clear 2026, published 11 March 2026.
#spotify #loudandclear #streamingeconomics
Spotify cites research showing user-centric payments would deliver "at most a few euros per year" for artists outside the top 10K. Worth noting this is Spotify's own citation in a the report. The transparency elsewhere does not fully resolve the conflict of interest in self-published research
Report limitation: tracks royalties from Spotify to rights holders, not through the royalty chain to artists. A label deal with standard royalty rates & unrecouped advances can substantially reduce what an artist receives from any figures. The report acknowledges this but cannot quantify it.
Genuine positives in the data: 1M streams = ~$11K in 2025 (vs ~$1K in 2014). Publishing royalties +2.5x over five years. 85% of new $100K+ artists outside US. 16 languages in Global Top 50 (vs 8 in 2020). Brazilian Funk +36%, K-Pop +31% in royalties generated above $100M.
Spotify defines ~250,000 out of 13M uploaders as pro artists. 81K earned $10K+ from Spotify in 2025 (~32%). Spotify's suggested multiplier for estimating total recorded income: 3x. Result: most artists earn under $30K annually from recorded music. The 100,000th earner on Spotify made $7.3k in 2025
Bold text reading $11b paid out by Spotify, so where is your money? Referencing Spotify's Loud and Clear 2026 annual transparency report, published March 11 2026, showing 2025 royalty data and artist earnings tier visualisations across the music industry
Spotify's Loud & Clear 2026 (published 11 March 2026) covers 2025 royalty data with more transparency than most streaming services offer. Headline: $11B+ paid to the music industry in 2025. The analytical question: what population is being measured, and what does "professional artist" mean here?
IQ Management’s Music Royalties 101, Part 1: copyright foundations, all six royalty types, and the collection organisations behind each: iqmgmnt.com/music-royalt...
#musicpublishing
A practical audit starting point: PRS for composition performance? PPL for sound recording performance? MCPS for mechanical reproduction? Sync licensing structured? Each is a separate process, separate income stream, separate registration.
The scale: PRS paid out £1.02B in 2024 (first time exceeding £1B). PPL topped £300M. MCPS distributed £204M in mechanical royalties in 2023, up 43% in 5 years. 19,300 performers received PPL royalties for the first time in 2024, music already made, just not collected.
The distinction that matters most: the composition (melody, lyrics) is administered by PRS. The sound recording (the master) is administered by PPL. Both generate income. Both require separate registration. One registration does not cover both rights.
Bold headline on dark background: ‘Are You Collecting EVERY ROYALTY You’re Owed?’ IQ Artist Management, UK Music Royalties 101
UK independent artists: @prsformusic.bsky.social registration is not the complete picture. UK music royalties operate across at least six distinct streams, each collected by different organisations. Understanding the composition/recording split is where it starts.
#musicroyalties
Report’s value: Quantifies economic contribution (£2.47B) while documenting structural fragility (venue contraction, artist economics, attribution failures). Evidence base for policy dialogue. Methodology transparent. Limitations acknowledged.
Full report: storage.googleapis.com/ntia-hosted-...
Credit: Night Time Industries Association, Michael Kill (CEO), Audience Strategies (research), 50+ industry contributors.
Essential reading for practitioners, policymakers, & researchers.
#nighttimeeconomy #ukmusic #independentartists
Audience transformation documented: Free events +34%, daytime +82%, North +93% (vs London +45%). Alternative spaces filling gaps. Question for practitioners: Are we witnessing infrastructure evolution or erosion? Both? How do development pathways rebuild?
Managing independent artists for 30 years: this “missing middle” problem accelerated post-pandemic. Venue progression pathways disappeared. Three roster artists left Spotify 2024 citing attribution failures report documents. Pattern matches: economic growth, access barriers.
Artist economics quantified: 62× streaming reach drop (established vs grassroots). 81% of producers: 0-10% income from royalties. 64% of nightclub royalties misallocated (£5.7M annually). Methodology: Viberate, NielsenIQ, Resident Advisor data. Sample: 100K+ events analysed.
Economic contribution: £2.47B (up 3%). UK ranks 2nd globally. But venue infrastructure: 823 nightclubs (-36% since 2020). Mid-tier capacity (500-2,500) = only 15%. Grassroots margins: 2.5%. Operators earning £26K annually. Growth concentrating at festival/arena scale.
Bold text reading 2026 = 36% fewer Venues after £2.5B Generated referencing the Night Time Industries Association Fourth UK Electronic Music Industry Report, published 12 February 2026, showing economic contribution of £2.47 billion and venue infrastructure data including 823 remaining nightclubs representing 36% decline since March 2020
The @ntiaofficial.bsky.social Fourth UK Electronic Music Report (98 pages, 50+ contributors, published 12 Feb 2026) quantifies what many practitioners suspected: economic growth masking infrastructure erosion.
Key findings:
Full analysis: the £12K case study, why collection societies won’t acknowledge pool dilution, stem registration, forensic DAW docs, watermarking services, monitoring tools that scan training datasets, realistic 2027-2028 timeline.
iqmgmnt.com/ai-and-music...
#musicpublishing #aimusic #copyright
When another artist was scraped in April 2025, coordinated response (DMCA + ICO complaints under GDPR Article 17 + payment processor threats) removed the track in 11 days. Unmanaged producers? Six months of ignored emails. The difference is infrastructure, not luck.
What the £12K collapse teaches: registration alone doesn’t protect you. You need forensic documentation that creates friction. Register stems individually, export dated DAW files weekly, watermark everything before sharing. Make yourself expensive to steal from when law offers nothing.
The government’s AI consultation (Feb 2025, 11,500 responses opposing scraping) resulted in policy paralysis. Transparency amendments Elton John lobbied for were stripped from the Data Act. Realistic legislation: 2027-2028. That’s 18-24 months while AI companies scrape with zero consequence.