@404media.co has excellent coverage of the surveillance state … important reading but also deeply unsettling, and thankfully 404 is there both to witness & to hold to account.

Wonderful counterpart to “not even wrong”!

I prefer “black bastard radiator” for myself:

An idealized source of pure bastardry, emanating in every direction indiscriminately 😹

“Misunderstood romantics”

Bullshit.
Controlling behaviour, a precursor to coercive control and worse
🚩🚩🚩

The friendliest SCP ever.

Highly anomalous though, obviously.
(I hear it even has a secure web mgmt interface!)

I’ll wait for the “and Zombies” version if that’s okay.

It’s neck & neck with “Roast Turkey” for my attention as the next big fragrance 😹

Damn, that window when pink grapefruit froyo was a thing … now that would be making America great again!

I think the Right would call this “collateral damage” 🤦‍♂️

Say hi to our ocean, please 🙏
She surely misses us, but maybe I’m just projecting 😢

(I’ve been wondering lately if there’s a “light decay” smell that could be added to our pool if we switched to saltwater … though my Ontario-born wife is not there yet 😹)

Brings a sick double meaning to “self indulgence” 🤮

The complacency is probably even more an issue, tbh.

A motivated voter can learn things despite the propaganda; a demotivated potential voter stops paying attention.

Accessibility benefits everyone.
- my kid 😻

But it does serve as a balm for the conscience while sipping umbrella drinks poolside 🤬

Safety first!
Especially in the workplace!

Right?
Give me a random new world order, odds are it’s not going to be as disgusting to its core.

I highly recommend it as well.

I also book off the day after the Super Bowl for similar reasons
😹🤷‍♂️

👍👍👍

a man talking to another man who says " pocket dogs i always got a hot dog in my pocket " ALT: a man talking to another man who says " pocket dogs i always got a hot dog in my pocket "

It really wasn’t even that.

I just love the opportunity to post a Rafi gif.

😹😹

😹

DC awaits your explanation.

Ok, let’s go for a different version then, since your faith prevents you from considering the conditional.

How many trans identifying males assaulting females at LWS public speaking events is too many?

Says the weasel.

As I said above, you simply don’t know.
The evidence isn’t there.

But yes, this is a me problem 🤦‍♂️

That’s not how math works, Anne, or logic 😹

66% of WHO guidelines including at least one Cochrane Review reference

IS NOT THE SAME AS

66% of all healthcare being subject to to the same lack of strong evidence as Cochrane reports from their reviews.

Maybe the ones used by WHO are the good ones🤷‍♂️

Your first claim was utter BS, unsupported by your “evidence”.

That you can’t admit that is telling, Anne.

The premise is independent of the data.

That *you* claim them to be dependent is a necessity of your unwillingness to answer, not a reflection of actual interdependence.

That’s how the conditional tense works — a hypothetical is involved.

So:
How many *would* be too many?

I sure do.

So what’s the sampling rate?