The final chapter of my PhD is published in Journal of Experimental Biology! And, we got the cover!
We used biologgers to estimate great hammerheads' temperature “sweet spot.” We saw they can perform well at a range of temps, which supports observations from the field. (1/2) 🌊🦑🧪🐟
Global analysis shows vessel traffic can disrupt behavior, communication, and stress physiology in marine megafauna, with potential long-term effects on population trends and conservation status. doi.org/hbqm4z
⚠️NO WAKE SCROLL ZONE⚠️
🚤Proceed reading at idle speed⛴️
New meta-analysis from @juliasaltzman.bsky.social untangles the effects of vessel disturbance on marine megafauna, published open access in npj Ocean Sustainability!
doi.org/10.1038/s441...
ICYMI (it being my most recent research publication) ⬇️
Another new publication! Congrats @juliasaltzman.bsky.social
🚨NEW 🐟 PAPER 🚨
On this episode of unusual animal friends…
@juliasaltzman.bsky.social was in the right place at the right time to record and generate an ethogram of a stingray-cobia pair, an interaction fishers have relied on to find and sight-fish for cobia!
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Check out our new publication on the growth rates and habitat use of nurse sharks in Biscayne Bay, FL compared to nearby Bimini, Bahamas which came out today (open access) in Environmental Biology of Fishes! link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Hypothesis: better Cuban food
Maybe a link that didn’t open to the reference list would be good 🤦🏻♂️ It’s still early(ish)
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
PS Get yourself a PI that conveniently already has the data to answer random questions. Shoutout @drcatmac.bsky.social
🚨New 🦈 paper🚨
Who would have thought that only 80 km of separation across the Straits of Florida would be enough to create significant differences in age and growth of Atlantic nurse sharks? Well… now us!
Curious? Open access article linked below
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
New Manta paper!!! Congrats and great work, Emily! 🥳
Open access and linked below
doi.org/10.1007/s002...
Oh my gosh that’s really cool! Thank you for inspiring it!
Doing really well! Completely lucked out stumbling into the world of shark ecology under some really great mentors, including David! Got excited seeing your name pop up on my feed, I’ll always remember your class, so unique compared to the rest of the bio courses I took! How are you?
Woah, crazy collision of past and present worlds!! @caraocobock.bsky.social taught me an absolutely awesome course on biological anthropology at ND! Fall 2019 if I’m remembering correctly
Thanks David! The trap fisheries will not be thrilled if true 😅
We swabbed their bums for trace amounts of fecal DNA, and when tiger sharks voluntarily regurgitated some material during working ups (as they are known to occasionally do) we opportunistically collected that vomit too! No pumped stomachs here 🐅🦈
#AES25 #JMIH25
Finally, @marinebiojohn.bsky.social John Hlavin, Reconstructing diets of Tiger Sharks in South FL
Thanks Carlyanne!! 🐅🦈
John’s title slide showing a juvenile tiger sharks
@marinebiojohn.bsky.social at #JMIH25 #AES25
A multi-method approach can help determine the diet of tiger sharks, different methods have pros and cons. Includes data from 67 Tiger sharks- I think I helped get data on 6 of these!
Whoa- @marinebiojohn.bsky.social found *cow* and *pig* among tiger shark diet.
(He thinks they were bait in lobster and crab traps)
Thanks for sharing!!
This was a HUGE effort with LOTS of field time and LOTS of analysis – huge thank you to all my coauthors and the many folks who contributed in the field. Very proud of this one. (4/4)
@dr-yannis.bsky.social 🦑🧪🌊🐟
See the paper: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Maybe this is an appropriate step for prestigious high impact journals like Nature, which should be the epitome of rigor and which young scientists may not be targeting right away anyway, but it might further dissuade that “deep three pointer” attempt. Anyway, thanks for prompting this!
I look at peer review like refining precious metals. Initial submissions should be allowed to be lumps of (well-reasoned and ethical) ore. When researchers are young or venturing into a new discipline/method, initial submissions open to scrutiny might discourage ventures beyond comfort zones.
So with that in mind, I think there’s already an inner voice of imposter syndrome whispering doubts of whether my published work will impress the veterans in my field enough. So for those vets to also be able to scrutinize a paper in its infancy is intimidating and might poke that insecurity.
Yes, actually! Most if not all of it does resonate with me! Thank you for the thoughtful response. I think my initial hesitation comes from a place of being a very early career scientist with only a few experiences of having my own work reviewed / being a reviewer.
All for double blind/disclosing reviewer identities, but total transparency of initial submissions, revisions, and comments/responses feels a bit like making artists hang their scrapbooks up next to their masterpiece… interested in your thoughts!
Further coverage, this time by @forbes.com columnist & #shark researcher @melissacmarquez.bsky.social, about the new paper on #hammerheadsharks using #BiscaneBay, #Florida as a #nursery
Column quotes @drcatmac.bsky.social
www.forbes.com/sites/meliss...