Since every app shares data with every other app...
Dating apps should automatically reject dudes who have ever posted whining about being blocked on forums or social media.
I don't know the exact correlation, but these people creep me out so much.
It's no different than how rightwing PACs enjoyed the fruits of Q or Project 2025 while also being able to shrug off any association when they backfired or directly or indirectly harmed individuals.
The idea of an "independent journalist" operating on a SIG grant is comedy.
The sad part is that he doesn't realize that he's also a victim in all of this.
The reason special interest organizations throw grants at like-minded writers is so they don't have to provide legal services or hold liability when this "independent journalist" makes false claims (and BOY did he)
In the grand scheme of things it's an afterthought on the budget usually.
But even little things like putting vibration dampeners on cooling fans and checking them once every few months can work wonders.
Well the author made the mistake of assuming that I'm some type of Jake Paul character pretending to be a scientist and not working and sharing data with formal sci organizations.
That video was an introduction to something I intend on contributing to for a very long time.
Finally, I think it's important for some of my viewers to fully understand the scope of special-interest groups directly funding character assassination and misinformation in the name of "altruism".
The reasons I felt compelled to respond:
- Some of the individuals dealing with health effects from infrasound exposure in my videos are now getting harassed and accused of lying.
- I was worried that his post would be cited via defense in active lawsuits w/o the conflicts of interest understood.
I'm unsure of what you're asking me to do.
You may be able to find them on Z-Library?
The ocean certainly creates infrasound, but:
A. It's not particularly loud on the coast unless there's a storm or seismic event.
B. It's not consistent at all. Something like a sustained 8Hz cycle isn't likely to occur. Those *seem* to be the ones causing harm.
Okay you're getting blocked.
Oh yes. The "no-strings-attached" grant. lol
I'm sure its renewal isn't contingent on the content being aligned with the tax-deductible donation. 😂
You're really having this conversation with the wrong person. Separating money from influencing content/research is the core rule of my career.
Not worth blocking.
But you respectfully have no idea what you're talking about.
If I moved my non-profit money to my own personal accounts without providing myself a salary or documented compensation, that's a felony.
You can't just assume I do so you can build this ridiculous narrative.
So you intentionally didn't read the text next to the link. That's a choice you made lol
Good Lord the cognitive bias is remarkable with y'all.
Me creating an NPO to remove monetary incentive in my content is not "as direct" as getting paid to write articles for a special interest group.
It's quite literally the fucking opposite. When I get offered money for content, I say no.
Do altruists intentionally not read?
Again with the illiteracy.
My channel operates under my nonprofit, and I do not pay myself salary. Every cent is invested into research and content.
Interestingly, infrasound has notably different characteristics vibro-acoustic disease. It's actually helped understand it better since it rules out nocebo.
journals.lww.com/nohe/fulltex...
Why the fuck do I type this stuff up when none of y'all can read it?
Wind turbine and datacenter infrasound are not even worthy of sharing research. They're very, very different things happening in different environments.
I just wrote a multipage post directly addressing to the criticism. You are actually responding just below it. 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻
Y'all are so upset that I blocked this human-embodiment-of-Reddit that I'm starting to think that I'm dealing with a cult.
Yeah, that honestly breaks my heart.
Also a lot of them are in active legal battles and I can't help but think that the datacenter defense attorneys may find his Substack and use it to further punish them.
Sure. Happy to help.
If he actually had legitimate concerns about the validity of my and the research of others, I would've been happy to talk about this stuff. But he didn't bother asking for comment.
It's hard to read his article and follow-ups with any level of good faith.
I mean, he's reached some extraordinary lengths to try and make me look like some nefarious grifter, and he got directly paid to do it.
One of the people in my videos has received Facebook messages harassing her for "making shit up", and I'm getting lovely messages like this from his followers. 🤷🏻♂️
Don't worry, he's already written dozens of articles minimizing those problems and insulting those who reported on them.
Yes.
Not only has he repeatedly insulted me, he's acting in bad faith by taking money to cause uncertainty around scientific research regarding AI and datacenters.
Why would I waste my time with someone operating in bad faith like that?
I did a write-up here regarding the weird Substack.
www.bennjordan.com/blog/the-alt...
For what it's worth, Andy is literally a paid special interest writer and I'm not.
Imagine the reaction to my video if it was discovered that a fund that shorts datacenter-related ETFs paid me to do all this research. 😂
Here you go. ✌🏻
I'm promising myself that this is the last moment of time I'm wasting on this.
www.bennjordan.com/blog/the-alt...
Excuse me?
You do realize how litigious these companies are when their infrastructure or behavior is criticized in a way that's literally being cited in legislation?
The fact that I'm sitting here reading your insults and not in deposition means my fact-checkers are doing a great job.
