We’ve got the Chadha hate train.

I’m starting the Bowsher v. Synar hate train. @joshchafetz.bsky.social

Right. And it CAN BE an additional constraint on a multi member court. But again, only so far as a majority is willing to confine themselves to the doctrinal limits.

Don’t disagree. I return to Duncan Kennedy’s argument about “where I want to come out” as a judge. Doctrine can limit whether/to what extent you can “come out” where you want to.

Yeah. The federalism revolution wasn’t anything of the sort.

Honestly I thought it would be the commerce clause, and it would make sense in the context of what Beau said.

I need context. What’s the favorite doctrine

I agree. It’s important as far as it goes. How far it goes depends as much on vibes as anything else.

See eg, the court’s commerce clause jurisprudence, taxing and spending, executive power, etc.

More than anything else this reveals just how impulsive the major questions doctrine revamp is. It all ultimately stemmed from Roberts's personal antipathy to a regulation, and everything since has been a dishonest attempt to dress it up so that he doesn't look like he's just shooting from the hip.

Very good piece by Christopher Fonzone. www.justsecurity.org/136242/presi...

What does this even mean?

Incredible! Did you just get it?

Kurt Lash: “I wish Kantor and Liptak would stick to the merits.”

Bingo.

The Inside Story of Five Days That Remade the Supreme Court

I’m interested to see how conservative court defenders will try and downplay or dismiss this evidence.

Gift link: www.nytimes.com/2026/04/18/u...

Indigenous Constitutionalism - Harvard Law Review By standard accounts, there are fifty-four constitutions across the federal, state, and territorial governments of the United States. But in fact, there are 230 other governmental constitutions that c...

@tannerallread.bsky.social's extraordinarily impressive article, "Indigenous Constitutionalism," has arrived!

"Indigenous constitutionalism as a distinct constitutional practice through which Native nations claim and exercise self-governance"

harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...

Listen man, my expertise is in constitutional law 🤷🏻‍♂️

Or just outright kill them

Instead of helping with attorneys fees, I’ll do him a solid and chip in for a nose hair trimmer. Jeez.

“Please help with court costs/attorneys fees”

Here’s an idea: don’t do coups.

That’s Eastman’s real account.

Himbs a clueless, beefy boy.

Abe says “what’s a tur-nay-doh”

Like. I’m by no means a 1A expert, but an attorney cannot lie in court or to clients and then claim a first amendment violation when he’s punished…

It’s more work than it’s worth.

Last one.

And Meggy

Yeah, same question from me lol

Or: do you prefer Tony?

The thing is both Anthony and I tried to talk, and he simply won’t answer a question.

They stick to the merits on Twitter. 👍🏻