Oh. My.
Posts by Marcelo LaFleur
In today's JMP blog, @economiyaki.bsky.social shows how even 3 hours/day of kindergarten in Indonesia is enough to increase women's employment (by 13 p.p.) & does not crowd out care offered by relatives blogs.worldbank.org/en/impacteva...?
**NEW WORKING PAPER**
Enlightenment Ideals and Belief in Progress in the Run-up to the Industrial Revolution: A Textual Analysis
w/ Ali Almelhem, Murat Iyigun & Austin Kennedy
Available at: docs.iza.org/dp16674.pdf
Short ๐งต belowโฆ
1/7
โLogging into Blueskyโ
๐
๐
Iโd be surprised if an LLM isnโt somewhat helpful. But Iโm more curious if/when it goes from being an aid to being a crutch. Is there a ceiling to the benefit? How does education adjust to LLMs when they prevent learning (the equivalent of using a calculator to learn long division)?
๐
Hi, computers expert here! this is not funny, computers only do this when they're in extreme distress
๐
๐
๐
A really excellent take and exactly what I think is problematic about our field.
open.substack.com/pub/rottenan...
๐
๐
๐
The policy might be effective, but it might not. People adapt, internalize. This will be empirical. One contrarian data point:
Interesting data here. Too soon to tell but Iโd be interested in how this gets evaluated. www.congestion-pricing-tracker.com
Would love a link
Anyone know of work that looks at algorithms as a form of capital? It strikes me that they are powerful ways to generate and extract returns in an increasingly digital economy
๐
Itโs my hypothesis. There is already a large congestion price in the form of bridge tolls. I think this wonโt really move the needle, and since itโs flat, it becomes regressive to the commuters
Honestly fascinated to observe what the adjustments will be. Will people really change their patterns? I suspect that everyone will just absorb the cost: effectively a regressive tax.
๐ excellent analytical work. This is a very clear and compelling explanation of the data.
๐
Happy 2025! For the first time I feel that the wave of AI will be a strong one on our profession. Weโll either surf it or get tossed about. But it should make for very interesting times
๐
There will be a dip in the number of papers about UBIโฆ
๐
But I 100% agree that this is breaking the signal of quality by drowning everything in noise. To make it worse, jobs will use and accept AI tools too, so even if you can get a signal, it may no longer be important. Heck, even universities are now deploying AI. To design and run courses. A crisis.