This is one of the best 21st century jazz albums
Posts by J.D. Porter
Once again pondering the fact that Penn's motto, Leges Sine Moribus Vanae, is usually translated as "Laws without morals are useless".
Kobe stans can take some comfort in the fact that he still has the second-longest run on top.
Wilt: 11 years
Kobe: 10
Admiral: 9
MJ: 6.3
Fulks: 6.2
David Thompson: 5.9
Booker: 5.8
No one else got to 4 years.
Frankie Baumolhtz and Mel Riebe got 2 days apiece, so Bam's already out of last place.
When Robinson retired 9 years after that, Karl was still around, and got the title back (now tied with Shaq) for that same 1990 game.
Finally TMac got rid of him for good by scoring 62 in 2004.
The weirdest journey in there might be Karl Malone, who tied Jordan with 61 in 1990. Two months later Jordan re-took sole ownership of the title with a 69-point game.
When Jordan retired, the title passed back to Karl, who lost it again ~10 months later when David Robinson scored 71.
1/2
Graph showing the history of active NBA players with the highest scoring game. The x axis is time, and the y axis shows how much they scored in that game. The graph begins in November, 1946 with Ed Sadowski's 18-point game and ends in November 1959 on an Elgin Baylor 55-point performance.
The first title holder was Ed Sadowski, who scored 18 points for the Toronto Huskies in the first BAA game. Some pretty amazing names in that first month: Max Zaslofsky, Mel Riebe, Dino Martin, Leo Mogus.
Joe Fulks finally stabilized the record via preposterous ball-hogging (63 points on 56 shots).
Graph showing the history of active NBA players with the highest scoring game. The x axis is time, and the y axis shows how much they scored in that game. The graph begins in November, 1959 with Elgin Baylor's 64-point game, and goes to just after Bam Adebayo scored 83 in March of 2026.
Bam Adebayo now holds the title belt for highest scoring game among active players. He's just the 34th player with this achievement, and the 21st since Elgin Baylor (the first good offensive player).
Three passages from a NY Times piece that was effectively an ad for Claude, the tool used to generate them. Each has a highlighted excerpt with a characteristically AI-ish "not" clause: 1. "Not from cruelty, but from understanding..." 2. "The universe is not indifferent to us; we are made of it..." 3. "Ambiguity was not weakness. It was survival."
In that NYTimes "spot the AI writing" quiz, three of the five examples use the "It's not X; it's Y" tactic. I feel like you see that a lot in all sorts of generated text.
What's the deal? Is this really common in the data, or is it somehow emerging from the training or generation process?
Great point—you're right that we were focused mostly on in-person stuff. Some of these recs would be useful for asynchronous learning; I really think strong norms against AI use could be as effective as e.g. those against plagiarism. Other recs less relevant. This merits a lot of additional thought!
I don’t think generative AI is an inevitable existential threat to these fundamental skills anymore than calculators were to learning arithmetic. We just have to keep the tech out of the class while students develop their skills.
Right now, too much falls to individual instructors (whose policies may be at odds with student expectations) and students (who face intense pressures to take shortcuts).
Solutions to this problem have to come at the institutional level. We need norms requiring AI-free work to graduate, setting clear policies about classroom expectations, and providing resources like AI-free labs.
It takes practice and feedback to develop skills in these areas, and, if left unchecked, generative AI makes that process impossible, since teachers can’t tell whether students are producing their own work.
The Price Lab’s Critical Approaches to AI Working Group has released a white paper in which we advocate for AI-free instruction in reading, writing, & research. These are fundamental skills in the humanities (& in general), & with decisive action we can keep teaching them well in the age of AI!
Finally, I just want to mention Dave Sumner’s monthly roundups of new releases on Bandcamp. These are really useful for keeping up with new work and discovering new artists, since he covers a wide range of styles/labels/scenes/etc. I really enjoyed reading his work this year.
Along those lines, I saw a video where Akinmusire recommends Paul Jacobs’s recordings of Schoenberg piano pieces. I’ve never really enjoyed Schoenberg, but this new context unlocked a lot of the beauty in his work, and sheds some interesting light on Akinmusire’s soloing, too.
One thing I’ve really enjoyed recently is pairing albums—listening to one and then the other a few times in a cycle.
I found the Glover album around the same time I was getting into Wayne Shorter’s Schizophrenia, and each made the other a lot more fun; they tell different stories when juxtaposed.
Oh is a brilliant composer, crafting song structures that use memorable hooks/riffs and melodic phrases to scaffold wide-ranging improv. Trumpeter Ambrose Akinmusire, one of my favorite current musicians, plays warm, brilliant lines, and drummer Tyshawn Sorey unifies the group.
#1
Strange Heavens
Linda May Han Oh
Kind of Like: Andrew Hill, certain Woody Shaw, Ornette Coleman, Tomeka Reid Quartet
Good for: Everything, just put this on all the time
I couldn't get this short enough, so see the next post for a description.
#2
Memories, Dreams, Reflections
Nicole Glover
Kind of like: Wayne Shorter
Good for: The part of the roadtrip where you enter or exit the city; late night reading
Combines accessible, pretty melodies/harmonies/songs with adventurous, knotty solos. It’s peaceful without ever being somnolent.
#3
Apple Cores
James Brandon Lewis
Kind of like: Jeff Parker, Don Cherry, certain Archie Shepp
Good for: The ride to work or the bar after, cooking with a game on in the background
Smart, high energy, angular yet catchy. The album works as a coherent piece, with recurring themes and sly callbacks.
#4
Solace of the Mind
Amina Claudine Myers
Kind of like: Debussy, Oscar Peterson, Kris Davis, Messiaen, Mary Lou Williams
Good for: Walking the dogs at sunset, looking out a train window
A serene blend of hymns, ambient, gospel, and quiet avant garde. I’m new to this album, but it stays with you.
#5
Myra Melford Splash
Myra Melford w/Michael Formanek & Ches Smith
Kind of like: Ethan Iverson, early Cecil Taylor
Good for: Contemplating, doing a bit more work at 9pm
Melford is one of those improvisers where you feel like you can hear her thinking as she plays. It’s very fun to think with her.
First some honorable mentions:
Jacob Garchik - Ye Olde 2 (complex, free, loud, cool guitar work)
Steve Lehman - The Music of Anthony Braxton (sharp, pretty renditions of classic work)
Mary Halvorson - About Ghosts (her usual brilliant, slurry, angular, intellectual work)
Jazz did a lot of heavy lifting for my sanity in 2025, and for whatever reason (coincidence? not?) it was a really good year for new jazz releases. I wanted to do a little thread about my favorite albums, and give a top five.
The extent to which everyone refuses to learn whether it's "Sliwa" or "Silwa" is very funny to me
The occupied city winning because its diverse prosperous team came through thanks to guys who don’t usually get the glory is what we’re going for here, I think.
Love this piece by Laura McGrath, who finds an important question for the book industry—“What if we’ve been over-estimating the role that genre plays in the life of a reader?"—in a recent paper I wrote with James English.
Snippet of one of the President's idiotic posts, asserting that "This Ballroom will be happily used for Generations to come!"
As a metaphor maybe
I think a lot of people feel an almost familial pride in and love for their cities, and among other things these marches highlight each city, its particular faces, slang, colors, streets, communities. It's ineffable but I think it’s profound.