Firefox's "You've opened 100 Container tabs" popup.
Achievement unlocked!
Firefox's "You've opened 100 Container tabs" popup.
Achievement unlocked!
you gave the same fucking answer, I'm not asking about scopeg pages Sorry, I can't answer that. To ask a new question, please start a new chat. Try asking about coding, development, or topics on the Stack Exchange network.
No wonder Stack Overflow is dying, even their ai is closing questions.
I don't like Go as a language, but reading on its internals is interesting.
Houston, we have a Error: MDB_PROBLEM: Unexpected problem - txn should abort here.
Original Hello World in "B" Programming Language
www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYS5...
5. Why C++/Rust Can't Match This https://github.com/codereport/max-odd-binary/blob/main/WHY_BQN_WINS.md
Y'all complaining about C/C++, prepare for C++/Rust.
I'm so glad that I started programming back when it was actually hard.
Visual comparison of Ordinary least squares v Theil–Sen linear regression.
serpent7776.github.io/regressionvis/
Github - ❌
Gitlab - ❌
Githlab - ✅
LLM is headpatting me.
● This is a genuinely clever idea. Let me work through the mechanics and numbers.
Brace yourself in this new vibe-coded world where nobody knows anything, because the whole system was designed and implemented by Claude.
But the underlying bug (where -1 is treated as the sentinel) dates back to the 2003 commit that introduced the H.264 codec. And then, in 2010, this bug was turned into a vulnerability when the code was refactored. Since then, this weakness has been missed by every fuzzer and human who has reviewed the code, and points to the qualitative difference that advanced language models provide. https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
Fuzzers are not enough to protect you.
LLM math:
test suite has ~90 tests that fail
one of the fixes addresses 14 failures
The other ~166 failures hit different code paths
That's actually not a bad idea.
If we had a co-worker who would do stupid shit like LLMs does, most of us would be fed up with this and wouldn't want to work with them.
But with LLM we just shrug it off and accept like it's somehow normal.
Enter signed integer overflow. TCP sequence numbers are 32-bit integers and wrap around. OpenBSD compared them by calculating (int)(a - b) < 0. That's correct when a and b are within 2^31 of each other—which real sequence numbers always are. But because of the first bug, nothing stops an attacker from placing the SACK block's start roughly 2^31 away from the real window. At that distance the subtraction overflows the sign bit in both comparisons, and the kernel concludes the attacker's start is below the hole and above the highest acknowledged byte at the same time. The impossible condition is satisfied, the only hole is deleted, the append runs, and the kernel writes to a null pointer, crashing the machine. https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
There's no so such thing as impossible in programming. Everything will happen eventually. And it will happen in the least appropriate moment.
#TIL #vim
:Gsplit HEAD~1:% " horizontal split
:Gvsplit HEAD~1:% " vertical split
:Gtabedit HEAD~1:% " new tab
Worms 2 Cutscenes Remastered in 4K
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5fn...
Switched from GPT 5.4 to GPT 5.3 Codex and it instantly feels 10x smarter and more focused.
Why are you keep corrupting my files GPT? WTF am I paying for?
Me: fix inconsistencies in the code
AI: does changes
AI: The previous edit damaged src/api.rs more broadly than intended
AI: resets and proceeds to make the same corrupted changes
Yeah, software engineering is so done for
"My God, a whole moment of happiness! Is that too little for the whole of a man's life?"
#quote
"for if one chair is not standing in the same position as it stood the day before, I am not myself"
#quote
Picture of interactive PSHUFB AMD64 SIMD instruction visualisation web page.
PSHUFB visualised.
serpent7776.github.io/simdvis/pshu...
alias c='command claude --allow-dangerously-skip-permissions'
chat, is this true?
> ZFS is genuinely slower than ext4 for metadata-heavy stat()/readdir() sweeps
Typeset Fortress versus ASCII Fortress Typeset Fortress code: histogramWater (x: List[[Z]]): Z = walk (maxCachedTree x, 0, 0) walk (x: Pair, left: Z, right: Z): Z = (*) Potentially parallel recursion walk (x.a, left, x.b.val MAX right) + walk (x.b, left MAX x.a.val, right) walk (x: Leaf, left: Z, right: Z): Z = ((left MIN right) MAX x.val) - x.val ASCII Fortress code: histogramWater(x: List[\ZZ\]): ZZ = walk(maxCachedTree x, 0, 0) walk(x: Pair, left: ZZ, right: ZZ): ZZ = (*) Potentially parallel recursion walk(x.a, left, x.b.val MAX right) + walk(x.b, left MAX x.a.val, right) walk(x: Leaf, left: ZZ, right: ZZ): ZZ = ((left MIN right) MAX x.val) - x.val
I've got to say that the typeset code reads very nice here.
> Resuming the full session will consume a substantial portion of your usage limits. We recommend resuming from a summary.
Why would resuming a session cost me usage limit Anthropic?
Our position is that an architectural definition is something that answers three questions: What are the structural elements of the system? How are they related to each other? What are the underlying principles and rationale that guide the answers to the previous two questions?
Architecture