RFK Jr: "President Trump has a different way of calculating percentages. If you have a $600 drug and you reduce it to $10, that's a 600% reduction."
Posts by Ian Campbell
This is a FRAUDULENT paper, AI-generated. My name was used as an author and I had nothing to do with it, never saw it until today e-pubmed.co.uk/journals/dig...
The "Editors" Angelo Rossi Mori, David Mensah, and Zarnie Khadjesari and this "Journal" should be reported.
The NEB scientists said radical change is needed (see box).
But @angelaisfranc.bsky.social and @tessakhan.bsky.social just talked about gradual transition (?NZ2050).
Which is it?
It’s a shambles.
It needs to be resolved.
There needs to be as consensus statement.
www.carbonindependent.org/198.html
Peter Magyar has offered a template which can be used, without too much alteration, in defeating populists worldwide
open.substack.com/pub/iandunt/...
This global energy shock is dwarfed by the global Climate Emergency.
The UK’s fair share carbon budget for 1.5°C runs out next year - see www.carbonindependent.org/195.html - but everyone is in denial about the urgency.
Actions for a livable future for our children/grandchildren are in the box.
Also: these are 'territorial', not 'consumption' emissions.
Explanations for instance on @iancampbell.bsky.social's site, www.carbonindependent.org/31.html
Would @profpaulbehrens.bsky.social write a consensus statement with @mikebernerslee.bsky.social & the other speakers to eliminate the confusion?
And support the @tyndallcentre.bsky.social scientists in rejecting NZ2050 as grossly inadequate & carbon colonialism (theconversation.com/the-uks-year...)?
Yes there were some excellent talks.
But what does @profpaulbehrens.bsky.social think should be done about the inconsistencies and omissions in the NEB talks (www.carbonindependent.org/198.html)?
Some speakers explained the need for radical transformation, others just promoted gradual transition.
Covid Action Logo. Text: The campaign to beat the pandemic. Campaign call: the catastrophic impact on the healthcare sector of the failures of pandemic emergency planners - discussion led by David Osborn - Davit, a health and safety practitioner and former Emergency Planning Manager will discuss the fundamental flaws in the thinking of the pandemic planners as evidence by NERTAG member Robert Dingwall's post on X: "There was insufficient evidence before 2020 to justify spending large sums of taxpayers money on masks, the evidence remains uncertain. HSE did not consider FFP2 masks suitable for protection against viruses." Monday, 13th April 6 pm UK time. Register at : https://tinyurl.com/3t976nft
Via @covidactionuk.bsky.social : Following the recommendation of the #Covidinquiry there's been explosive news from CATA about the coverup from 2020 on #PPE which still dominates guidance in #NHS and led to death of thousands of #HCWs Mon 13th April 6pm Register tinyurl.com/3t976nft
#Covid #Health
“private sufficiency & public luxury”
#GoodIdea
NEW: This new report, from BBC, is the best takedown of the insanity of Trump you will see anywhere.
Calm, coherent and repeating only Trump’s own words. Devastating.
Brilliant work once again from Roz Atkins.
(🎥 BBC News)
Thanks for reminding me of the article. It sketches out some of the headline shifts that would be needed – & the unavoidable requirement to reallocate society’s productive capacity away from furnishing narrow private luxury and toward wider social good. Private sufficiency & public luxury, perhaps.
The box shows a summary that I've done of actions to be taken in high emission countries, suggested by the NEB scientists in their Nov 2025 talks, together with the article by @kevinclimate.bsky.social at www.sgr.org.uk/resources/ge... (hoping that I've not misquoted anybody).
Register at: tinyurl.com/5t4ap4z6 for this important discussion
#covidactionuk
#covidaware
#covidconscious
@kevinclimate.bsky.social recommends “repeatedly and coherently countering the ‘mitigation deniers’ wherever they may reside” (www.sgr.org.uk/resources/ge...).
That’s what I’m doing, and encouraging others to do so as well.
3e
and @friends-earth.bsky.social (www.carbonindependent.org/139.html)
and many others
all understating the gravity of the situation, and the urgency and scale of radical action needed,
and contributing to delay, deaths and human misery.
2/
Yes - it’s a shambles/tragedy/disaster.
Economists, energy consultants, and many others groups haven’t made the effort to understand the science of carbon budgets
In campaigning groups, it’s not just @nebriefing.bsky.social
But also @zero-hour.bsky.social (www.carbonindependent.org/174.html)
1/
The scientists were excellent and talked about emergency radical action, but @angelaisfranc.bsky.social and @tessakhan.bsky.social covered only non-emergency transition.
This is mitigation denial and needs to be fixed - see www.carbonindependent.org/198.html
Thank you.
I've tried to clarify this in the www.carbonindependent.org/198.html web page.
My thoughts on the problems with the #NEB economics and energy briefings are in the box.
Further feedback would be very welcome.
It would be even better if it didn't have 4 full-page adverts for holidays involving flying!
What's being done about the major flaws in the briefings (www.carbonindependent.org/198.html)?
The NEB scientists said radical change is needed (see box).
But the economist ignored the science and said greening the economy is enough.
If this isn't resolved, the film will just cause more confusion.
The consequences of letting your internal monologue play with other people's internal monologues.
What's being done about the major flaws in the briefings (www.carbonindependent.org/198.html)?
Is radical transformation needed (see box) or not?
The scientists e.g. @kevinclimate.bsky.social & @hughmontgomery.bsky.social said Yes.
But @angelaisfranc.bsky.social & @tessakhan.bsky.social said No.
Feeling like this might be a useful one to re-post today, for lots of different groups of people
Excerpts from the CAN Bills
Zero Hour is peddling false hope with "the Climate and Nature Bill”
The original Bill was watered down and the update just endorses Net Zero 2050 - not the emergency response that's needed - see quotes & www.carbonindependent.org/174.html
Activists should challenge ZH, not repeat the misinformation.
This is a terrible headline!
Adapting to a 3C hotter world is not 'daunting but doable'. We need to be doing everything we can to avoid such a catastrophic future, while heavily investing in adaptation.
Climate actions needed
Another irresponsible post from @zero-hour.bsky.social
Why are they doing this?
The updated #CANBill isn't an emergency response - it just endorses Net Zero 2050.
Zero Hour should revert to its original principles and back the #NEB2025 scientists calling for immediate transformational change.
🚨BREAKING NEWS!
Medics that broke windows at JP Morgan HQ to expose fossil fuel financing links to climate devastation found NOT GUILTY today by jurors.
The climate crisis is a health crisis and health professionals have a duty to act when lives are at risk.
Read more here:
healthforxr.com
List of UK policies needed according to NEB scientists
The #NEB2025 briefings add to the widespread confusion & misinformation.
The NEB scientists said radical change is needed (see box) (www.carbonindependent.org/198.html)
But the economist ignored the science and said greening the economy is enough.
This needs to be resolved prior to further publicity