Developers when they see the CodeRabbit Codex Plugin
Posts by CodeRabbit
The faster your engineers ship with AI, the more code review becomes the bottleneck!
freee saw it coming before it became a crisis 🚨
> 54% acceptance rate on critical issues
> 32.8 weeks of reviewer time saved
> Reduced manual code-review burden
→ www.coderabbit.ai/case-studie...
When your vibe-coded app is functional but ugly af
Read more about PR Usage-Based Add-On here!
docs.coderabbit.ai/management/...
www.coderabbit.ai/blog/Introd...
We just shipped the PR Usage-Based Add-On so you can keep shipping without worrying about hitting limits!
Use more when you need it. Pay only for what you use.
Opt in from the CodeRabbit dashboard.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBj...
How do you scale an open-source project to over a million downloads a day? 🤔
We sit down with Bill Easton, core maintainer of FastMCP and Director of Product at Elastic, to dive deep into the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem.
Full video in the comments! 👇
CodeRabbit already tells you what to fix. Now it fixes it too.
@coderabbitai autofix
All unresolved findings, implemented. Commit to your branch or open a stacked PR.
Introducing CodeRabbit Ads! 🎉
To offset the growing cost of tokens, we are introducing ads to our free tier.
What this means:
> Free users will see ads of differing size based on the size of the PR.
> Clicking an ad will give you a free review!
Join CodeRabbit’s VP of AI, David Loker, for a live look at how our Agent Orchestration works and what builders can learn from the architecture!
> AI’s Hidden Quality Tax
> Intent vs Execution Gap
> CodeRabbit: Plan -> Code -> Review
Register below!
Same PR comments every sprint?
We just shipped Custom Finishing Touch recipes.
Give it a try!
We just hit 200k installs on GitHub!
Thats enough to fill Webley Stadium...twice! 🎉⚽
🤫
Starting with the Transformer paper in 2017 to background agents opening PRs in 2026, Read the full breakdown here:
www.coderabbit.ai/blog/a-very...
A dark background features a coding icon with circuit patterns, highlighting AI coding evolution from Copilot to advanced agents.
From predicting the next line to opening pull requests autonomously, the history of AI coding agents isn't just autocomplete getting smarter!
It's the systematic decomposition of software engineering into machine-operable layers
And we've covered the whole arc 👇
The problem isn’t your agent, It’s the missing plan.
Try today: www.coderabbit.ai/plan
Learn more: www.coderabbit.ai/blog/meet-c...
Introducing CodeRabbit Plan.
Hand those prompts to whatever coding agent you use and start building!
🎙️ Our VP of AI David Loker are speaking today at GTC26!
Session S81612: Practical Context Engineering; Eliminate Bugs With High-Signal AI Code Reviews
→ Fix 50% more bugs
→ Ship 50% faster
→ Real context-engineering playbook
→ 11:00 - 11:40 PDT
Bottom line:
Gemini 3.1 Pro →
✅ higher signal-to-noise
✅ more focused comments
❌ slightly lower bug coverage
❌ weaker on concurrency
Whether that’s better depends on your team’s tolerance for noise.
www.coderabbit.ai/blog/gemini...
Gemini also seems to know when it's right.
Passing comments vs failing comments:
> 38% more assertive
> 33% longer
> more likely to include code
When Gemini is confident and detailed, it’s usually correct.
But there’s a tradeoff.
Bug coverage:
> Gemini → 60.9% EP detection
> Baseline → 65.2%
So Gemini produces cleaner reviews, but misses a few more bugs.
Signal-to-noise ratio was where Gemini really stood out.
> Gemini SNR: 3.5
> Baseline SNR: 2.6
Meaning: when Gemini comments on something, it’s more likely to be a real issue.
Gemini 3.1 Pro leaves 24% fewer actionable comments than our baseline.
But they’re more likely to matter.
Precision:
> Gemini → 33.3%
> Baseline → 29.8%
Less chatter, slightly better aim.
We benchmarked Gemini 3.1 Pro for PR review against our internal CodeRabbit baseline.
Result:
> Fewer comments.
> Higher signal-to-noise.
> But slightly fewer bugs detected.
Let's get into it. 🧵