Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by CodeRabbit

Post image

Developers when they see the CodeRabbit Codex Plugin

2 days ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
AI Code Reviews | CodeRabbit | Try for Free AI-first pull request reviewer with context-aware feedback, line-by-line code suggestions, and real-time chat.

The faster your engineers ship with AI, the more code review becomes the bottleneck!

freee saw it coming before it became a crisis 🚨

> 54% acceptance rate on critical issues
> 32.8 weeks of reviewer time saved
> Reduced manual code-review burden

→ www.coderabbit.ai/case-studie...

5 days ago 2 1 0 0
Post image

When your vibe-coded app is functional but ugly af

1 week ago 1 1 0 0
Preview
AI Code Reviews | CodeRabbit | Try for Free AI-first pull request reviewer with context-aware feedback, line-by-line code suggestions, and real-time chat.

Read more about PR Usage-Based Add-On here!

docs.coderabbit.ai/management/...

www.coderabbit.ai/blog/Introd...

1 week ago 0 0 0 0
Video

We just shipped the PR Usage-Based Add-On so you can keep shipping without worrying about hitting limits!

Use more when you need it. Pay only for what you use.

Opt in from the CodeRabbit dashboard.

1 week ago 1 1 1 0
Future of MCP: Bill Easton on FastMCP's 1M+ Daily Downloads & AI Agents
Future of MCP: Bill Easton on FastMCP's 1M+ Daily Downloads & AI Agents How do you scale an open-source project to over a million downloads a day? In this episode, Hendrik sits down with Bill Easton, core maintainer of FastMCP an...

www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBj...

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Video

How do you scale an open-source project to over a million downloads a day? 🤔

We sit down with Bill Easton, core maintainer of FastMCP and Director of Product at Elastic, to dive deep into the Model Context Protocol (MCP) ecosystem.

Full video in the comments! 👇

2 weeks ago 2 1 1 0
Advertisement
Preview
CodeRabbit Documentation - AI code reviews on pull requests, IDE, and CLI Automatically implement fixes for unresolved CodeRabbit review findings.

Get started with Autofix today!

www.coderabbit.ai/blog/you-do...
docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-t...

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Video

CodeRabbit already tells you what to fix. Now it fixes it too.

@​coderabbitai autofix

All unresolved findings, implemented. Commit to your branch or open a stacked PR.

2 weeks ago 1 1 1 0
Post image

Introducing CodeRabbit Ads! 🎉

To offset the growing cost of tokens, we are introducing ads to our free tier.

What this means:

> Free users will see ads of differing size based on the size of the PR.
> Clicking an ad will give you a free review!

2 weeks ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Plan First, Ship Faster: How CodeRabbit Built Agent Orchestration on Claude | Webinars \ Anthropic We’ll walk through live demos and share best practices to arm your teams in building industry-leading agent experiences. Register now.

Register now to attend!

www.anthropic.com/webinars/ho...

2 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Join CodeRabbit’s VP of AI, David Loker, for a live look at how our Agent Orchestration works and what builders can learn from the architecture!

> AI’s Hidden Quality Tax
> Intent vs Execution Gap
> CodeRabbit: Plan -> Code -> Review

Register below!

2 weeks ago 2 1 2 0
Post image
3 weeks ago 2 0 1 0
Preview
CodeRabbit Documentation - AI code reviews on pull requests, IDE, and CLI Define reusable, named recipes that run agentic code changes on your pull requests.

Want to deep dive?

Heres the docs!

docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-t...

3 weeks ago 0 0 0 0
Video

Same PR comments every sprint?

We just shipped Custom Finishing Touch recipes.

Give it a try!

3 weeks ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement
Post image

We just hit 200k installs on GitHub!

Thats enough to fill Webley Stadium...twice! 🎉⚽

3 weeks ago 2 0 0 0
Post image

🤫

4 weeks ago 4 0 0 0
Preview
From Copilot to agents: The history of AI coding Trace the evolution of AI coding: how simple models became autonomous agents that plan, execute, and ship software independently.

Starting with the Transformer paper in 2017 to background agents opening PRs in 2026, Read the full breakdown here:

www.coderabbit.ai/blog/a-very...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
A dark background features a coding icon with circuit patterns, highlighting AI coding evolution from Copilot to advanced agents.

A dark background features a coding icon with circuit patterns, highlighting AI coding evolution from Copilot to advanced agents.

From predicting the next line to opening pull requests autonomously, the history of AI coding agents isn't just autocomplete getting smarter!

It's the systematic decomposition of software engineering into machine-operable layers

And we've covered the whole arc 👇

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
Meet CodeRabbit Plan: Better plans. Faster deployments. CodeRabbit Plan helps teams using coding agents plan collaboratively and align intent before anyone writes a line of code.

The problem isn’t your agent, It’s the missing plan.

Try today: www.coderabbit.ai/plan

Learn more: www.coderabbit.ai/blog/meet-c...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Video

Introducing CodeRabbit Plan.

Hand those prompts to whatever coding agent you use and start building!

1 month ago 2 1 1 0
Preview
Practical Context Engineering: Eliminate Bugs With High-Signal AI Code Reviews AI-assisted coding has sped up code generation, but human-only code reviews are now the bottleneck. Too many pull requests (PRs), not enough review...

Link to the session:

www.nvidia.com/gtc/session...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

🎙️ Our VP of AI David Loker are speaking today at GTC26!

Session S81612: Practical Context Engineering; Eliminate Bugs With High-Signal AI Code Reviews

→ Fix 50% more bugs
→ Ship 50% faster
→ Real context-engineering playbook

→ 11:00 - 11:40 PDT

1 month ago 0 1 1 0
Preview
Gemini 3.1 Pro for code-related tasks We evaluated Gemini 3.1 Pro and found it leaves fewer, more focused comments with a higher signal-to-noise ratio, but also surfaces fewer bugs overall

Bottom line:

Gemini 3.1 Pro →
✅ higher signal-to-noise
✅ more focused comments
❌ slightly lower bug coverage
❌ weaker on concurrency

Whether that’s better depends on your team’s tolerance for noise.

www.coderabbit.ai/blog/gemini...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

Gemini also seems to know when it's right.

Passing comments vs failing comments:
> 38% more assertive
> 33% longer
> more likely to include code

When Gemini is confident and detailed, it’s usually correct.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

But there’s a tradeoff.

Bug coverage:
> Gemini → 60.9% EP detection
> Baseline → 65.2%

So Gemini produces cleaner reviews, but misses a few more bugs.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Signal-to-noise ratio was where Gemini really stood out.

> Gemini SNR: 3.5
> Baseline SNR: 2.6

Meaning: when Gemini comments on something, it’s more likely to be a real issue.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

Gemini 3.1 Pro leaves 24% fewer actionable comments than our baseline.
But they’re more likely to matter.

Precision:
> Gemini → 33.3%
> Baseline → 29.8%

Less chatter, slightly better aim.

1 month ago 0 0 1 0
Post image

We benchmarked Gemini 3.1 Pro for PR review against our internal CodeRabbit baseline.

Result:
> Fewer comments.
> Higher signal-to-noise.
> But slightly fewer bugs detected.

Let's get into it. 🧵

1 month ago 2 1 1 0
Preview
Pre-Merge Checks: Built-in & custom PR rules enforced Pre-Merge Checks automatically evaluate a pull request whenever it opens or updates. Instead of relying on reviewers to mentally track every policy.

Learn more about our pre-merge checks here!

www.coderabbit.ai/blog/pre-me...

1 month ago 0 0 0 0