Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Left Outside

Post image

Oh God…

1 hour ago 172 38 46 55
Three cool scientists introduce their work "Our new theory has been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, but we feel its depths and intricacies are best appreciated on the limited-edition vinyl release."

Three cool scientists introduce their work "Our new theory has been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, but we feel its depths and intricacies are best appreciated on the limited-edition vinyl release."

My latest cartoon for @newscientist.com

40 minutes ago 378 103 5 4

Lots of phones for reception to handle, must be 1,000s of drop offs a day and collections. Confiscation is good, but I just haven't heard any actual benefits to allowing kids to bring them at all. Was the same 20 years ago and phones are much more distracting now than then.

2 hours ago 0 0 1 0

Oh, sounds like there isn't an actual issue. Its an issue created by the existence of phones. Stopping schools being "trigger happy" calling children is a goal not a negative side effect, surely?

3 hours ago 0 0 1 0

Such a wonderful story. You can buy a Live Departures Board for £300, but British Rail can't afford one for Barton-on-Humber Lincolnshire, so there's now one in The White Swan opposite

4 hours ago 32 13 5 2

Perhaps you can explain because the carer situation is one I find quite compelling. But I don't really know how often a child needs to immediately leave school or remotely complete a task for an adult they're caring for. How often would delaying contact to the end of class cause harm?

3 hours ago 0 0 1 0

There are, of course, more phones than ever, and no child in an emergency would find it harder to find an adult with a phone today than a payphone 20 years ago. Preventing children taking phones to school does not put them in danger. bsky.app/profile/otto...

3 hours ago 0 0 0 0

voice of the nation and yet so unpopular!

3 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Can't remember who I quote tweeted here but they either blocked me or removed the post. But they were not offering a remotely convincing argument about why kids need smartphones in school because its impossible to do so.

3 hours ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement

What if your child is kidnapped on the way to school without their phone and (assuming the kidnapper would have let them keep their phone in the counterfactual) was not able to phone for help?

3 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Too late. Schools have had their chance and they've fucked it. Parents a major problem too of course, and schools are too deferential to parents lying about how their child needs a phone.

3 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Sounds like nationally coordinated policy on phone use could help here!

3 hours ago 2 0 1 0

Nah, they can just go to the school office and use the phone there. Oooh I've got a special exemption versus no you don't.

3 hours ago 0 0 0 0

Banning phones in schools sounds great and everyone saying their reasons its bad sound mental to me.

3 hours ago 11 0 4 0

Very happy dipping my toe back in the union world - I drilled down into what today’s strike action was actually about

4 hours ago 6 6 1 0

Oh so it's a *crime* to be lovely and warm in your own holdall?

4 hours ago 14 0 0 0
Headline: "The power of verbs (and why you should never use an adverb)", but I've crossed out the adverb "never"

Headline: "The power of verbs (and why you should never use an adverb)", but I've crossed out the adverb "never"

Well OK, if you insist

5 hours ago 24 13 1 1

“It’s clear that AI companies’ initial promise to America — that first it would take their job, and eventually it might kill them — has not inspired a groundswell of public support.”

5 hours ago 145 42 3 0

John Lennon levels

13 hours ago 6 0 0 0
Advertisement

All Kings are valid

14 hours ago 0 0 1 0

That series is just non-stop bangers. A short thread:

15 hours ago 71 21 6 4

All political news to normal people looks like this. Curtains for Stoosha? Olly Robbins caught flipping a grunt.

14 hours ago 3 2 0 0

Many people are saying it's curtains for Stoosha.

14 hours ago 0 0 1 0
Preview
The Mandelson fiasco reveals the true nature of Starmerism This is a prime minister who does not understand the difficult trade-offs involved in governing

Keir Starmer famously said there was "no such thing" as Starmerism. He was half-right: there is no such ideology. There is however an approach to managing and running the country that is core to so many of the government's difficulties that we probably should call 'Starmerism'. In tomorrow's paper:

18 hours ago 278 63 31 16

When I was in Madrid, outside the palace they have a statue to artaufo I, who I think was the first post Roman Visigothic king in what would become (but let's be honest was not) Spain. So it can be done. You can just pick any old guy and start counting.

14 hours ago 1 0 1 0
Orange fluffy cat inside my car.

Orange fluffy cat inside my car.

I have to go to work and this is not my cat.

1 day ago 14439 1019 880 158

Labour's bench has some problems.

15 hours ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

"...that's right, old friend...one last job."

15 hours ago 5 0 1 0

Another one I love:

19 hours ago 11 2 0 1

What odds do you give a Mandy return? It's not zero is it? 10%?

15 hours ago 10 0 2 0