Should we create a better one? What would that look like?

I appreciate the discussion and I agree that that’s bad, but they’ll still ask what’s the tangible consequence. Or rather they’ll say, they have all my data anyway, what do I care?

I agree with you but most people ask why? What do you tell them? Do you have real tangible consequences of falling for the trap?

At first I thought this was an RFK joke. But I see it’s just about length width height.

My Plea to Democrats: Stop Being Polite, Go Nuclear A former Republican strategist lays out what the Dems must do if they win back the House next year, including defunding the entire executive branch and nationalizing SpaceX.

I think this will be super important going forward. zeteo.com/p/my-plea-to...

Table A-2. Employment status of the civilian population by race, sex, and age - 2025 M03 Results

February-March: Black women -266k, White men +168k
May-August: Black women -72k, White men +282k

web.archive.org/web/20250407...
And www.bls.gov/news.release... for current data

Bullet point that says become paralyzed and ineffective. This is a single bullet point due to misplaced new line, but is an example of the ineffectiveness.

I love it

You create an object from a class. Each object is an instance of the class template or blueprint.

What!

What brought you to reading this case?

Interesting. Thanks. I wonder how I could get this in Bluesky.

Trypophobia warning please

Lord Henry from Picture of Dorian Gray.

Why’s that? Just to make fun of it?

Probably depends on the audience but often you start with OTP and XOR and work up from there introducing why you need added complexity.

I think this is it a.co/d/hCKzViB

Revved too hard.

Invest 100K?? Who did they think their users were? In the 90s.

Haha did you [citation needed] your own post?

Thanks for the reminder. Just donated to 404 media.

Reading through this it seems reasonable if you trust Google with this information. Do you have an opinion?

Would you recommend the company? Which was it?

“Every one of the five pieces of evidence supporting the lab leak hypothesis … is factually incorrect, embellished, or presented in a misleading way,” Rasmussen wrote in an email. “But making evidence-based arguments in good faith about the pandemic’s origin is not the purpose of this document. This is pure propaganda, intended to justify the systematic devastation of the federal government, particularly programs devoted to public health and biomedical research,” Rasmussen added.

It’s a quote from someone else but it’s definitely in the article.

What do you recommend?

A MAGA hat

Is it possible that they did this in a few hours? They must have had this prepped if it’s related. Unless you’re saying that they knew that this was coming, or that it’s related to existing Mexico Canada tariffs?

A tariff for a tariff makes the whole world go broke.

Are you suggesting that libertarians could change their minds?

What good does it do though? Just for catharsis?

Yes but can we attack ideas instead of looks?