Maybe he’s in therapy.

Sir, it’s an anti-terrorism operation.

Subject-matter experts are convinced. I read Satter’s book on the bombings, and the case is persuasive.

Fucking love that movie.

Yup. Cutting through the BS about the state acting on our behalf to prosecute and juries as the community’s proxy, it’s all really about deciding when/how legal consequences attach to conduct.

Bostons are mischievous but you can’t be mad at those cute faces.

“Sigh, yeah, I’ve got this one.”

I have you all beat but it’s too dirty and makes me look like the biggest idiot who has ever lived.

Frankly, we all should have guessed this instantly but we were not cynical enough.

With my man Joel!

“In the private sector” is the new “farm upstate.”

Remember who the sole dissenter was in that case?

I bet the White House has a bespoke Trumpifier AI.

Jellico!

I’m 5’6”. The world wasn’t made for the short or the tall.

I wonder how that would affect the former clerk network that currently serves as partisans for the justices, facilitating leaks and shaping press coverage.

Thanks for posting this. Sent it to the family chat with the widely available version for comparison, lol.

“Sorry, I wrote the email in my head and thought I sent it.”

Unfairly forgotten (largely).

And be black, have grown up poor with speaking English as a second language, and be relentlessly against everything Thomas is for.

Yes, into the 1990s as well.

Is Chad the one who prompted the suspension of a prosecutor?

It’s not like The Pitt?

JFC

That’ll do it!

There is so much potential with that premise, in terms of the nominee.

Are you tall?

Sigh…. my maybe hot take…. LLMs seem to be useful in interrogating original meaning, but they are not a “method” as such. The caveat is that I used it only for the 1970s and 1980s, not the Founding era.

I watched this recently, hope it’s still streaming.