a wizard (why’s pfp), a skeleton minion (Claude) approached “i’ve read through your notifications, they wish to harm you m’lord” close up on the wizard “oh dear… block them all.” the skeleton minion crawls away “yes m’lord, Claude shall block the non-believers, yes…”

IQ was invented by eugenicists to justify racism. Its like phrenology

If there is room for interpretation in a law, always assume that someone will abuse it. Its literally an explicit part of the right wing playback to cloud bills in plausible deniability and vague language exactly for that reason.

And they will always throw a fit when its done to them.

Decided to do a little more digging to learn more about those 2020 Biden voters who skipped 2024, why they skipped, and what sort of message might win them back, and found this helpful research by Celinda Lake from last year: waytowin.docsend.com/view/rnv5spt...

Unironically "Art of War" was a basics manual written by a general to stop nobles from getting their men slaughtered in droves when they wanted to play war with human lives. Thats why huge parts of it are so simple. Its "babies first war, a how to"

It's so weird that centrists keep scolding "the left" for losing them an election and meanwhile the former Democratic nominee of the party is like "all these Nazis need to be welcomed into the tent" like idk maybe these two ideas are part of the reason she lost idk

They're really going full doomsday prophecy death cult, intentionally sending soldiers to get sick and die

OP gives big "children are starving in africa so eat your vegetables" vibe

so do you believe that you deserve to be put in a concentration camp because american troops are slaughtering iranian children or is it different when it's white folk killing non-white folk

People who think it only counts as racism if it involves slurs, burning crosses, and lynchings:

quick q: would you be fine with a situation where other countries use "internment camps" for citizens of "American Origin" every time the U.S. trades blood for oil?

'No you don't get it, they had to accept genocide to have a chance'
Maybe the US isn't worth saving then

Except that just isn't true. At all. Numerous sources, including dems own internal reports.
And, here's the kicker:
THEY LOST ANYWAY, SO SELLING OUT TO ISRAEL GOT THEM NOTHING.
I would rather they lost standing against genocide than win because of supporting it

How many more nails does the coffin need, liberals?

And liberals have the gall to claim Kamala would have been meaningfully different. That she would have turned off the orphan crusher

The correct strategy for your Vote is to promise it to a Party years in advance regardless of their performance and without asking anything in return. This is called "Leverage." Unrelated but I lost all my money and clothes playing poker again last night please help

And liberals would be at brunch

Only difference would be that smug liberals would be even more inclined to say that Gaza doesn't matter since it didn't affect the outcome of the election

To this day you run into liberals and people claiming to be leftists that say this didn't happen and isn't true. And its just impossible to take them seriously cause its the politicians themselves who said and did these things. Irrefutably. They happened

Joe Biden was steadfastly committed to ensuring Israel could kill every Palestinian and Arab person in the Levant and Kamala Harris said she wouldn’t have done anything differently during the campaign. That’s it. That’s the moment they lost and deliberating anything else is a pointless distraction

"I will always vote-" there it is. No matter how bad it gets, you will always support them. They will never fix fascism because they don't have to for your vote. They don't have to open the camps, republicans will do it, and you'll never push them to close the camps, cause you'll vote for them

"No one supports genocide" sure buddy. And Kamala didn't promise unwavering support for Israel. Dem politicians aren't, to this day, vowing their allegiance to defending Israel. Chuck Schumer was not at a fundraiser last month promising Israel was one of his top priorities.

John believes its irrational to ever expect politicians to earn your vote by adopting your policies. John believes that politicians should not be expected to adopt policies with an 80% approval rate cause....it might alienate voters?

Says who, John? Who are you alienating when you refuse to run on policy stances with 80%+ approval?

Hey John, how rational is it, as a political actor, to tell politicians you'll vote for them no matter what? That nothing they could ever do would lose your vote. Would that be a rational way of accomplishing your political goals?

I want someone who doesn't support Genocide, John. Weird how thats a "pony" in your world

So that means you have to listen to leftists, right? It means you have to actually win their vote, right?

You get that you can't just demand people fall in line, right?

Hey, you support Genocide, and Kamala Harris called Iran a fundamental threat to the US. You laid the ground work for each and every one of trumps atrocities, you spineless fuck

Mood

Okay, so then that means you can't blame leftists, right? Since they don't have enough voting power, right?