Magnificent depiction. Idyllic telling of a non-idyllic situation.
Posts by Daniel Bailey
Graphic, showing another way of looking at that 10,000 year commitment to sea level rise, expressed in units of Dwayne Johnson's height (almost 2 meters):
Another way of looking at that, expressed in units of Dwayne Johnson's height (almost 2 meters):
Figure, from the IPCC AR6, WG1, Chapter 9, Table 9.10, P. 1305, the table attached shows the 10,000-year commitment to future SLR. SLR will continue for millennia, regardless of pathways followed, due to the ponderously slow adjustment time of the land-based ice sheets.
From the IPCC AR6, WG1, Chapter 9, Table 9.10, P. 1305, the table below shows the 10,000-year commitment to future SLR.
SLR will continue for millennia, regardless of pathways followed, due to the ponderously slow adjustment time of the land-based ice sheets.
Not advocating for this, but they could protect all the urban areas adjacent to the Mediterranean by implementing the Atlantropa Project. Providing that the many technical issues can be overcome.
brilliantmaps.com/map-of-the-a...
They could protect all the urban areas adjacent to the Mediterranean by implementing the Atlantropa Project. Providing the technical issues can be overcome.
brilliantmaps.com/map-of-the-a...
The link I cited proves your claims false.
The human-causation of the current warming of Earth's surface is considered a fact by science.
science.nasa.gov/climate-chan...
www.ipcc.ch/2026/04/14/p...
Plumbing the abyssal depths of science-dumb.
It seems to me that he's saying that science is dead because vested special interests rule the field now.
NASA graphic, showing the recent rise in atmospheric concentration of CO2 is unprecedented over the past 800,000 or so years.
Unprecedented, over the past 800,000 or so years, per NASA.
If someone has to bill themselves as an "Honest Broker", pro tip:
They ain't one.
I think that's Australis. The image is mostly oriented with south at the top.
Perhaps you missed this, from that same paper (section 3.1):
"However, the OHC increase is within the uncertainty range"
I've been very specific, hence the usage of quotes like this:
"his own coauthored research does point toward acceleration"
You don't specify which research to which you refer. Having read his published research I am confident it does not do any such thing (in a Princess Bride sense).
Your continuation in personalizing attacks is noted, as is your mischaracterizing of published research; this reflects poorly upon you. BlueSky is supposed to be better than this.
For now, the ocean sink continues apace. It's why ocean acidification continues as well.
Specifically, Leon Simons' drive-by falsehood claim:
"he got the very basics of forcing and heat accumulation wrong"
It is essentially a swipe at a senior scientist that for some reason he has a beef with.
This part of your assertion:
"he got the very basics of forcing and heat accumulation wrong"
Please refrain from disinformation.
It will last as long as the entire NASA Global Climate Change website lasts. They won't take down just part of it. Facts endure and the human-causation of the current observed warming is considered to be a scientific fact.
None of significance. Even the Perito Moreno Glacier is receding.
www.nature.com/articles/s43...
No substantive sea ice cover?
Graphic, showing Ch4 in PPB degrades to CO2 but remains in PPB, so its warming is far less than CO2 released in PPM.
Yes, indeed. IIRC, this was shared by Glen Peters.
yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-pr...
Thank you, for conceding that you failed the Burden of Proof test and are unable to support your claims with source citations to credible scientific sources.
Do you have a credible source for that?
In the meantime, this says otherwise:
volcano.si.edu/faq/index.cf...
To be fair, there's no substantive increase in volcanic activity. There's better and more thorough documentation of that kind of thing.
Troll reported and blocked.