the way this makes sense for RFK is that "healthy people" and "sick people" are ontological categories.
Posts by AntiNickname
People with preexisting conditions also don’t deserve to die
Ahahahahaha what do you mean the TECHNICAL ADVISOR to Bluesky just blocked over 300k users by following an ANTI-AI, AI HATERS blocklist.
Embarassing.
Tesla Q1 earnings call is now live, Elon has begun his comments, follow along here
www.youtube.com/live/qO7T5zg...
It is inconsistent with our country's norms and traditions for Democrats to fight back. We encourage Virginia Republicans to bring a lawsuit against the new maps as soon as possible.
by John Roberts (joined by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett)
Screenshot of a social media post by Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) that reads: "One of my biggest hopes for the future is that we can come up with some sort of test in utero to determine if a child is going to grow up to be transsexual, and then opt them out of the gene pool. It's, I can tell you firsthand, it's a horrific way to grow up, one that no ethical person should want to inflict on a child. The reason the trans community is so unstable online is the developmental damage that we invariably get. It's like a house being built where every floor is leaning, and by the time you get to the top, the entire structure is unstable. Repairing that damage has taken me a lifetime."
Brianna Wu advocates for the extermination of trans people by engaging in eugenicist selective abortions of fetuses determined to be trans.
Im sorry for your loss but I am glad you have the rest of the pups there for love and support.
If I could convince partner to take in a third I would do that
This is part of the reason why we got two cats after my 17 y/o cat died. I just cannot handle that big of a shift. Although now we have brothers and when one passes my heart is going to break forever for the other one. Oh shit I am starting to cry at work I literally cannot handle the thought lol
The implicit media consensus is that urban voters should not be able to overrule rural voters, but that rural voters should be able to overrule urban voters, an assumption so axiomatic and unquestionable that nobody even understands they're making it.
thinking about following the mets this season
I wish people like this would just admit they don't like women in politics.
100% came here to say this.
It’s the reason we don’t have universal healthcare imo. Some white folks would rather die than see Black people get anything at all
Yes I know treble damages typically apply in tree law. That’s why I was asking where cutting down someone else’s trees is not expensive—because it is largely considered *notoriously* expensive.
And sure, it’s possible she isn’t telling us everything. But based on what she said, if true…. Yeah, $$$
Palantir put out the most cartoonishly evil statement possible. They’re so arrogant and self-confident they don’t seem to believe their fascistic plans can be opposed.
We must get rid of Palantir altogether.
twitter-thread.com/t/2045574398...
s/ Mustafa T. Kasubhai MUSTAFA T. KASUBHAI (he/him) United States District Judge
Let’s fucking GO
The Court's judgment will declare as follows: Defendants lack the authority to unilaterally establish standards of care that supersede professionally recognized standards of care for provision of gender-affirming care recognized in the Plaintiff States. Defendants also lack the authority to exclude providers from federal healthcare programs based on their provision of gender-affirming care in a manner and quality consistent with the professionally recognized standards of care in the Plaintiff States.
“Defendants lack the authority to unilaterally establish standards of care that supersede professionally recognized standards of care for provision of gender-affirming care recognized in the Plaintiff States.”
Link to the ruling. I am not sure I’ve seen a judicial opinion with this many tweet screenshots in it before storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
If you took the combined wealth of every American billionaire and evenly distributed it amongst all Black Americans, it would come out to about $156,000 per.
The last formal procedure I have adopted is to include my pronouns in my signature line on all my written opinions, unpublished and published. Assuming the practice reflects an authentic commitment to equity and inclusion, imagine how powerful a statement it could be when Ninth Circuit Court judges do this. And dare I dare to imagine when U.S. Supreme Court justices include their pronouns? Over the last year I’ve had many uncertain experiences with pronouns. Admittedly my footing has not always been steady as I’ve tried to navigate this landscape. So why do this work? As a judge in our federal courts I have a responsibility to find ways to ensure access to our courts. When people are not seen or heard, they have no real access to the courts. When people feel unsafe coming into the courts because of their gender identity, there is no real access. When we deny someone their identity, we have the power to erase them. That is horrifying. But when we can acknowledge gender, a name, and identity, we exercise the power to honor a person’s dignity. When we do this we say, “I see you, I hear you.” That is how we can break the silences between us. U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai of the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon is based in Eugene. SUMMER 2021
"The last formal procedure I have adopted is to include my pronouns in my signature line on all my written opinions ...
When people feel unsafe coming into the courts because of their gender identity, there is no real access."
www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/u...
So here is what concerns me. Yes LLMs are text generators, we know, we know.
But text and output deletion?
To delete inputs or questions without consent and then to be programmed to *lie* and gaslight about it.. is… something.
Has anyone experienced this?
They are talking about it from the perspective that her claims are accurate, just like you were not long ago. But where in the US is it not expensive to cut down trees on another person’s property? I genuinely don’t know the answer to this and would love to learn.
The first line of this video is:
"I'm suing my neighbors because they cut down twenty trees on my property..."
That sound you heard was very lawyer going "ohhhhhh shit...:
ACTUAL MALICE STANDARD IS NOW WHAT SOME WOULD CALL A LEGAL LAYUP
“The low adoption likely has nothing to do with what people want or even expect," EFF’s @thorinklosowski.com told @techradar.com. "Our messages should be protected with end-to-end encryption without requiring us to opt into the feature.” www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-pri...
This!
"AI is great because nobody has to bother writing stuff! And then also it can summarise texts, so nobody has to bother reading stuff!"
I.... What are we doing here?
A small cohort of ("prominent"?) law professors are trying to portray John Eastman as some kind of innocent victim of viewpoint discrimination, and his disbarment as some kind of assault on the First Amendment.
That's complete and utter bollocks. As usual, @gabrielmalor.bsky.social brings receipts: