Judge Alin Cintean’s journey—from immigrant roots to both sides of the courtroom—brings rare perspective to the Sacramento bench. See how his story shapes his approach to justice. Full profile [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/1z9E50YzTfX

Want to reach California’s top legal professionals? Hear how Harry Kazakian, President & CEO of USA Express Legal and Investigative Services, grew his business with the Daily Journal. Watch his testimonial and click on the link to see what others are saying: https://dailyjournal.com/testimonial

Supreme Court: ISPs aren’t contributorily liable for users’ copyright infringement without clear intent. In Cox v. Sony Music, failing to terminate accounts after notices isn’t enough. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/Nprh50YzhBi

#CopyrightAct #SupremeCourt

Can a former employee share internal, privileged emails with her attorney? The appellate court says the State Fund rule applies even when materials are apparently taken from the privilege holder. Read more (subscribers only): https://ow.ly/GG3x50YyNMf

Music before calendar. Context over blame. Judge George A. Turner Jr. brings a public defender’s perspective to dependency court, where every decision carries long-term consequences for families. See how that philosophy plays out on the bench. Subscribers only. https://ow.ly/zIj850YyLO7

Court of Appeal: Impounding a legally parked car after a stop for a suspended license isn’t justified under the community caretaking doctrine. Evidence found in the search was thrown out. Read the court’s analysis. Subscribers only. https://ow.ly/hfRe50Yx5VH

Ninth Circuit: Incorporating JAMS rules means the arbitrator—not the court—decides validity, even with a severability clause. FAA governs, not state law. Full analysis for subscribers: https://ow.ly/hMqh50Ywz10 #NinthCircuit #Arbitration #LegalUpdate

Late-night rulings. Packed calendars. Judge Michael C. Small keeps his courtroom moving with one constant: preparation. Attorneys say his focus on clarity and efficiency shapes every case. See how his approach impacts lawyers and litigants. [Subscribers only]
https://ow.ly/6K0E50Ywpur

A care facility’s bid to compel arbitration after a resident’s death was denied—and the appellate court affirmed. The agreement didn’t clearly delegate enforceability issues to the arbitrator. See the court’s analysis at the link. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/rniI50Yw68s

In People v. Riggs, the Court of Appeal held that a temporary State Bar suspension for alleged CTAPP noncompliance did not, by itself, establish ineffective assistance or a constitutional violation. Read the court’s analysis. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/fTos50YvCOR

In People v. Anderson and Allen, the court held suppression was not required under CalECPA where officers reasonably relied on a deceased participant’s mother’s consent to search a phone recovered from his body. Link to the court’s analysis below. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/fyy450Yv3pV

“I was reversed once because I was too efficient.” Now, Judge Laura A. Seigle handles massive cases like the Eaton Fire litigation by prioritizing deep preparation, collaboration, and rulings that last. Read her full profile [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/C7kT50YuT9u

A California appellate court held that declaratory relief may be used to resolve competing attorney lien claims in one action when the clients and competing claimant are joined. The court can decide lien validity, amount, and priority together. [Subscribers only] https://ow.ly/Ki3u50YtRXe

How should courts sentence when crimes involve both determinate and indeterminate terms? In People v. Valencia, a California appellate court clarified Penal Code 1170.1 applies to consecutive determinate terms. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/5Qrz50YtweF

From teaching and aerospace to the Sacramento probate bench, Commissioner Heath T. Langle’s path is anything but typical. Attorneys praise his preparation and practical approach—shaped by a unique journey.

Read more (subscribers only): https://ow.ly/HCiB50YsXUl

A first-grade student’s drawing led to a Ninth Circuit dispute on student speech. The court vacated summary judgment, finding no likely disruption under Tinker v. Des Moines. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/skI450YszlR

“Justice isn’t about revenge — it’s about compassion and the rule of law,” says Judge Rupa S. Goswami. Her courtroom blends empathy with discipline. Full profile at the link. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/Br3B50YstXm

A boundary hedge at a Santa Barbara golf course sparked a prescriptive easement dispute. The Court of Appeal affirmed Montecito Country Club’s right to maintain the hedge after years of continuous use.

Read more: https://ow.ly/3Wgm50YrBTS

#LegalNews #CaliforniaLaw #RealProperty

A trial court denied shared dog custody, citing cases that don’t exist. The Court of Appeal called this an abuse of discretion—but affirmed the order since the appellant’s own lawyer used the same fake citations and didn’t object. Analysis [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/Krn650YqvkW

Judge Enrique Guerrero’s courtroom stands out for respect, careful listening, and practical rulings. Discover how his approach lets attorneys build their record and why dignity matters in every case. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/kSN450YqkTV

A $50M+ talc asbestos verdict against Avon stands. The Court of Appeal found Avon abandoned its novelty challenge, so expert testimony was analyzed under Sargon.

Read more: https://ow.ly/5L4N50YpXY4

#LegalNews #CaliforniaLaw #AppellateCourt #ToxicTorts #Asbestos

A former public defender now presiding over capital murder trials and hundreds of mental health diversion cases — Judge Michael A. Knish is one of those rare judges both sides respect. Full profile [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/h9ZH50YpKzj #CaliforniaLaw #CriminalLaw

Ninth Circuit partially lifts stay on an injunction against California school policies that conceal student gender transitions from parents. Parents seeking religious exemptions likely to succeed on #FreeExerciseClause. Subscribers only: https://ow.ly/3gh150Yph61 #NinthCircuit #EducationLaw

The Ninth Circuit reversed in an #IDEA case, holding a district’s duty to offer #FAPE isn’t tied to parents’ wording in IEP requests. Remanded to assess if SDUSD provided a FAPE. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/vts750YoKzz #SpecialEducation #LegalNews #DisabilityRights

Probate filings are rising, and resources are tight. Judge Brenda J. Penny helped shape the court’s procedures and stands out for her focus on equity and individual rights. See how her approach is changing probate court. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/RJi350Yoaih

The California Supreme Court held assault is not a lesser included offense of Penal Code § 69(a), emphasizing that § 69(a) does not require present ability to commit violent injury. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/lIgO50YmITn #LegalNews #CaliforniaLaw #AppellateCourt #CriminalLaw

A $445M loss ballooned to $1.98B at trial, but the Court of Appeal ruled the “lost investment gain” theory violated CCP §2034.260. That award was vacated and remanded. Full analysis [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/bRwP50YmzMr #LegalNews #AppellateLaw #CivilProcedure #Evidence

Probate is where family history meets fiduciary duty. Judge Daniel Juarez calls some cases “little puzzles”—balancing empathy with strict adherence to the instrument and the record. His calendar runs into 2027. How he keeps order in a crowded courtroom [subscribers only]:
https://ow.ly/J8Tk50Ymz8r

Judge Michael E. Whitaker keeps Beverly Hills trials on schedule—no shortcuts, just process and rules. Trial lawyers, don’t miss his profile. [Subscribers only] https://ow.ly/9Xcy50Yl95w #LegalNews #JudicialProfile #LosAngeles #DailyJournal

Big news: The Court of Appeal says Prop 65’s 60-day notice rules are directory, not mandatory—substantial compliance is enough. This could impact future cases. Reversed and remanded. Read more [subscribers only]: https://ow.ly/Lz5t50YkzaL #LegalNews #EnvironmentalLaw #CaliforniaLaw #Prop65