Nobody except zionists thinks the word "zio" is a slur.

Are we talking about the same word?

What's the old Portuguese word for "black?

The emotional fallout from disinformation is the fault of the disinformation.

It is our job to correct the record and to vilify the zionists for trying to divide us.

All people are perfectly capable of being educated on how the zionists are manipulating well-meaning people into thinking a perfectly neutral term is a slur, due to a lengthy smear campaign.

Zionists have knowingly manipulated otherwise well-meaning people into thinking a perfectly neutral word is a slur, because they want to divide the anti-zionist space and punish innocent activists.

If something is regarded as a slur based on a lie, then it is incumbent upon us to correct the lie, not to perpetuate it.
I will reiterate, that it is the zionists who cynically and falsely linked the word "zio" to neo-nazis.

The idea that "zio" is an anti-Jewish slur is a big lie that is just as pernicious as the 40 beheaded babies.

Right now, people in anti-zionist spaces are persecuting people based on that big lie, just as people have been victimized by the 40-beheaded babies lie embraced by well-meaning people.

I have taken their concerns into consideration, but in this case, it turns out they have fallen for the lies being promulgated by zionists wishing to cause division in anti-zionist spaces.

The term does not dehumanize Jewish people. It was used to denounce zionists, until zionists launched a smear campaign to convince people that the term is a slur.

I for one refuse to be manipulated by the zionists.

The word has been been around before zionists smeared it as a neo-nazi term.

How could I put this in plainer language so that you'll understand?

For the record, zionists have always been trying to link anti-zionists with neonazis, and you're helping them spread that propaganda.

Anti-zionists have used the words far longer than the zionists have attributed it to david duke.

Why are you splitting hairs?

The word "zio" is there.

BY DEFINITION IT IS WRONG TO DEFINE A WORD AS A SLUR JUST BECAUSE ZIONISTS TELL YOU TO DO SO!!!

Because they are being lied to by the zionists, and we need to correct the lie and prevent the infighting that the zionists want.

They're being lied to by zionists, and they should reject those lies.

No, "zio" has been been used far longer to describe the zionists and the zionist regime.

Far longer than the zionist effort to link all anti-zionists to david duke.

There is nothing to debate about "zio."

The term was used by genuine anti-zionists longer than zionists discovered david duke using the word.

Unlike you, I refuse to be manipulated by the zionists.

Question everything told to you by zionists and zionist elements.

I resist any and all things related to zionists, including their lies about "zio" and their smear campaigns against innocent people who use that term.

You should re-examine how to be a better ally.

This infighting is exactly what the zionists want, and you're giving it to them.

A real ally wouldn't malign anti-zionist resisters who use a word as perfectly innocuous as "zio."

A real ally wouldn't do the zionists' work for them.

Zionists focused on the neonazis while ignoring the richer history of the good faith anti-zionist resistance that has used that word for far longer.

You don't need to lean on the distorted narrative concocted by the zionists. What's next? Do we stop drinking milk because neonazis drank milk?

The word "zio" is attached to "nazi," which is supposed to be verboten, correct?

This is a very weird hair you're splitting.

And 1982 predates david duke's use of the term.

While I sympathize with the Jewish people who were fooled by zionists that "zio" is an antisemitic term, at the end of the day, they are simply wrong, and we should stick to facts.

Maybe instead of centering zionists who foment division, we should center those harmed by zionists.

I already showed you that "zio" actually had its origins in zionist resistance, but you would rather do the zionists dirty work and smear good-faith anti-zionists who use that term.

Some ally you are.

Yep, all zionists want to do is smear their opponents, and the so-called "allies" are helping them do it!

Yes.

The operative objection is to the shortening of the word "zionist" to zio and its derivative terms.

Can you please not be so bad faith about this?

The facts are the facts. "Zio" was a neutral term that predated david duke, but zionists now want to make it into an antisemitic slur.

You don't listen to zionists, you ignore them.