Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Tom Harris

This is brilliant.

8 months ago 2 0 1 0

Well said, John. Best of luck in the future – you deserve it.

8 months ago 29 0 1 0

Yeah, I've lost count of the number of seven-year-olds who were disappointed because the last copy of the Old Testament had already been checked out.

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

I hate misogynists. I have no interest in what their sexuality is.

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

He called her frit for taking death threats seriously. I wish David Amess had been "frit" and hadn't attended his constituency advice surgery that day. Cashman is a misogynist tosser.

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

Do people on BlueSky genuinely believe there's any analogy between exercising an adult's judgment over what books might be appropriate for children and the Nazi practice of banning and burning texts they disapproved of?

8 months ago 3 0 0 0

Apart from children's libraries, of course, where only extremists and groomers want there to be a choice of sexually inappropriate books.

8 months ago 0 0 2 0

It shows quite breathtaking arrogance and mind-blowing lack of self-awareness for Fife Health Board's KC to complain that Naomi Cunningham doesn't use Upton's preferred pronouns, almost as if she hasn't understood what the case is about.

8 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image
9 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
Post image

When old-fashioned democracy simply isn't enough for our pampered little darlings. Latest Substack (£): open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...

9 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Some thoughts on Stephen Fry, the midwit’s midwit, over at @thespectator1828.bsky.social.

www.spectator.co.uk/article/step...

9 months ago 13 5 0 0
Post image

I suppose if you're the kind of person who believes that men can become women, it's a relatively small step to believing that, two months after the Supreme Court ruling, Gender Criticals are losing the argument.

10 months ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
Abortion rights and wrongs Four good reasons to regret a bad decision by Parliament

Latest Substack: open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

Has Baroness Warsi called Dame Louise Casey a racist yet?

10 months ago 1 0 0 0
Preview
Arise, Arise! Jeremy Corbyn's rumoured new party has its work cut out for it

New Substack in Corbyn's new political party: open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...

10 months ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
Will a national rape gangs inquiry bring an end to the police's 'bullshit bingo'? The failure to help young victims was a deliberate choice made for very bad reasons

open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...

10 months ago 2 0 0 0
Preview
Mea culpa: my part in the rise of the trans cult The Gender Recognition Bill looked harmless enough. If only I'd known. . .

open.substack.com/pub/tomharri...

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

No, you're anti-Semitic.

11 months ago 4 0 0 0

Tch! Honestly, standards have fallen since my day . . .

11 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement

Male MPs should either go back to wearing ties or they should wear shirts that are intended to be worn without ties.

11 months ago 0 0 2 0

This approach will definitely persuade voters not to support Reform. Definitely.

11 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

A genuine question for @stonewalluk.bsky.social: when do you think the Equality Act 2010 will come into force? (The clue is in the title)

11 months ago 3 0 0 0

If by "transgender females" you mean men, then yes, I have an issue with them using bathrooms provided for the opposite sex. So does every right-thinking person.

11 months ago 0 0 1 0

Every MP who took a knee. Every politician who claimed not to know what a woman was. Every MP who didn't speak up for the victims of the grooming gangs. Every MP who signed a letter opposing the deportation of foreign criminals. Reform's victory is yours. Own it.

11 months ago 1 0 0 0

No, I want female-only spaces. I certainly do not want to exclude *any* females. I do want to exclude men (males), however.

11 months ago 0 0 1 0

You're probably too young to remember this, but "far right extremism" used to mean racist or fascist ideology. Now it means wanting female-only spaces.

11 months ago 0 0 1 0

Ah! Canadian. It all makes sense now.

11 months ago 0 0 1 0

I have no religious beliefs with regard to trans people. The only religion here is the one followed by the gender cultists who believe in gender ideology without evidence – the very definition of faith.

11 months ago 0 0 1 0
Advertisement

They have exactly the same rights to use toilets assigned to their biological sex as anyone else. Just because crazed Marxist college lecturers tell their students that "biological sex" is "pseudoscientific" does not make it so. No court would have any difficulty defining the phrase.

11 months ago 0 0 2 0

Am I the only person who feels his spidey sense set off by the obsessive and constant demands by men to spend seemingly all their time in women's loos?

11 months ago 1 0 1 0