Ugh.
Posts by Paola Poot
The focus on procedures is common to a lot of them. That’s where I think Weak Central Coherence comes in. They hyper focus on a detail taken out of context to support their narrative. Kevin, Joe Rossi, MadLibs, WarTornTrump, and so on, have that in common.
Ah, memories.
Interesting to see Melissa involved now, as she previously alluded in a tweet that Kevin took credit for her work.
Rochelle is Kevin’s wife and one of the 4 founders of Election Oversight Group.
Melissa is “lick dirt” TxSaving. She spent a lot of money on records requests.
Joe Rossi is one of the affidavit witnesses. He shows up at SEB meetings with disinformation (although he believes what he says).
Thanks. I read the debunking section last night.
Oh. I deleted that Drive folder.
🍿
Yup. I changed the title in the Twitter article. Must do the same for the blog post.
Are they implying Garrett is an alt account of Stephen Richer?
Or it was a Nazi reference. No idea. It doesn’t need to make sense.
The mistake in the headline is very annoying, and it caused disinformation problems on Twitter. Ugh.
I feel sorry for Garrett. Replies to him like this make me 🤯
Only the ignorant turned up on J6.
Reversing the results isn’t the point.
I think it’s to
- give Trump ammo
- undermining the results in a county like Fulton (large black population)
- undermining faith in elections
- presenting oneself as expert researchers to influence on people in political positions (GA SEB)
- get more paid work
Well, the FBI already have the materials and has likely made copies and scans. The FBI affidavit allows sharing with govt employees and “experts”. Clay Parikh is a temp government employee. The election deniers now have lots of material to create more chaos. I think this is an information war.
Quack
Welcome to life in 2026, where the lion’s share of what passes for political discourse consists of Explaining Extremely Obvious Things to People Who Refuse to Listen
An article about 🫠 Clay Parikh. Yikes. Is there a term for Q-adjacent?
talkingpointsmemo.com/news/meet-th...
I documented investigation findings for each claim in the FBI Fulton affidavit. Turns out that the only violations are by two of the witnesses!
#laffydavit
cassandraspeakstruth.wordpress.com/2026/02/13/f...
I am copying the article to a Wordpress site. I have been updating the article as I find more information.
Article: FBI Affidavit Identifies Two Potential Felony Violations
It’s not what you think.
🔗 x.com/pootdibou/st...
Thank you. I appreciate your kind words. Note that I’m not here often.
Have you seen these?
1. The FBI affidavit used to seize ballots and other materials from the 2020 election in Fulton County relies on debunked conspiracy theories. For example, it isn’t true that Fulton first “reported” 511,343 ballots and then “reported” 527,925. I’ll explain.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
State Election Board
7 May 2024
SEB 2023-025
Complaint: Irregularities in the Recount that lead to the addition of 16,382 votes to the “Batches Loaded Report” (BLR)
Investigation: Moncla/Rossi incorrectly assumed that a BLR was used by Fulton county to report official vote count results.
She lied in the Jeff Clark hearing.
She was a counter re: pristine ballots. Hopefully at least she will be held to account for lying in an affidavit.
Fulton affidavit:
Witness 1: Joe Rossi
Witness 2: Dr Janice Johnston
Witness 3: Janelle King
Witness 4: Chris Harvey
Witness 5: Phillip Davis @mad_liberals
Witness 6: ?
Witness 7: Kevin Moncla
Witness 8: Suzi Voyles
Witness 9: Barbara Hartman
Witness 10: Richard Barron
Witness 11: Bridget Thorne
What are the legal implications of the affidavit fuckupery?
Yikes. What a pain.