IMO, almost everything involving paranormal phenomena is quickly dismissed by our science due to beliefs. But a belief could be a starting point.
If someone was healed with prayers, let's study how that happened. Placebo effect is real and nobody knows well how it works yet.
Just look at the image you posted. How do you know what it is? Just like with UFOs, an image alone doesn't say much. You need data. Research. Experience. Knowledge. Then you'll be able to see 🙂
We don't even know what UFOs are. What ghosts are. We've barely begun to investigate this.
To a certain extent, yes. We’re shaped by our belief systems and tend to ignore what doesn't fit into our framework or overvalue what has its place.
How do we know something exists? Can you see an atom? Until someone finds a way to "see" it, it doesn't really exist.🤷🏼♀️
I don't know much about the Emerald Tablet of Thoth. But I've heard about the idea of a spaceship buried under the pyramids. Maybe it's buried under the Sphinx, who knows?
He’s a strong name in the ufo lore and he’s making money with his documentary like many others.
Truth and deception in his stories 💯
Very intriguing isn’t it? I kinda agree with him. I'm revisiting his books, it's been a long time since I read them. Have you seen that episode of Anomaly? It's fiction, but it shows how RV was (and I bet still is) used to find UFOs.
According to Ingo Swann, the three different “types” of UFOs involve apparitional visitors (interdimensionals), crafts or remotely operated devices, and the third type concerns advanced technology from black budgets programs.
#ufosky
“Ingo never treated UFOs or UAPs as a single, unified phenomenon. In Penetration, he makes it clear that what people lump together under “UFOs” are actually three entirely different kinds of events involving three different kinds of intelligences, technologies, and intentions.”
Joshua Cutchin explains why forcing UFOs into a single framework may actually prevent us from seeing what’s really going on.
Instead of choosing one model, the phenomenon may require something much harder.
@tobehumanshow.bsky.social
https://f.mtr.cool/bonfwwexpy
Maybe nasa has a competitor 🧐
Hmmmmmmmmm what, uh, what ya got there rover cam? 🧐
web.archive.org/web/20061108...
web.archive.org/web/20100503...
“Remote viewing was uniquely suited for that kind of work: it can bypass distance, compartmentalization, and technological shields, reaching information that conventional means cannot.“
ingoswann.com/ufos%2Fuaps
"This process is well underway, and we've found many very interesting documents, I must say.
The first releases will begin very, very soon, so you can go out and see if that phenomena is correct."
I can’t stand his voice, but
Let’s take a look at these files #ufosky
youtu.be/aHZ_9tddKPg?...
I Completely Support This Petition….
NASA’s Artemis II proved key systems for human lunar travel, boosting confidence in future missions. Commander Reid Wiseman says landing astronauts on the Moon is challenging but achievable soon, with upcoming missions targeting a return by around 2027–2028
“Some of the dreams were described as unsettling or distressing. (…)
In contrast, other dreams conveyed beauty or serenity – often through natural or symbolic imagery.”
Interesting.
Some orbs have more to do with paranormal exp than with UFOs imho. But spheres, no, they seem to be solid physical objects. Like Jeff, I've also encountered a large ball of light like the one he describes.
Also, good analogy with how a bee can change direction 🎯
Good interview!
😞 Accidents happen 🫂
Life is brief—embrace it with courage, love with all your heart, and don’t let regret take up space
Are you ok?
That’s the point.
For those wondering what happened with Bsky
Thanks for the update 🦋
Concerningly, all four have been tied to McCasland through his work overseeing the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL), based at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, which has been rumored to study extraterrestrial technology since the 1947 Roswell UFO crash.
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/...
