And an entire year’s expected political espionage game will not materialize for them. While you love to see it, at the same time know that those APT teams will have to do new and possibly creative things this year to make up for the shortfall, even if only for their own internal metrics.
Imagine for a minute how the adversary intrusion operators feel, who having put all of the work into another year’s campaign against Davos events, find that basically no one is attending this year because center of gravity is absolutely in DC at the moment.
Going into a national security special event with a staggeringly bright communications footprint involving absolutely no fail missions, it sure would have been nice to have confidence that SALT TYPHOON has been evicted from US telecom networks before now.
First impression is one of a very committed assault element.
Apparent counterrevolutionary / revenge hits against Iranian judiciary figures involved in extrajudicial prisoner killings & moharebeh cases, reads like something out of John Wick, with edged weapon engagement used to acquire battlefield pickup small arms.
The precedent that service footage may circulate in this manner will be critical for future poison pen claims, especially those involving Pacific regional tensions and conflict interactions (such as fabricated claims about war crimes).
Beyond a few idiots posting to Red Note in their military & other gov roles, there is substantial incentive for United Front to surge video exfiltrated from cyber espionage, in new placement under hijacked or synthetic identities.
Claude instructed kitchen table nuclear ☢️ experimentation livestream is definitely a 2020s reboot of the Manhattan Project (1986) movie. Or perhaps that sad story about the Boy Scout who tried to build a neutron source by scraping together americium.
One really ought to be concerned about the errors in Apple Intelligence presentation of news. Because when even Cupertino cannot get it right, the roll your own LLMs being pushed across agencies & services for national security missions almost certainly aren’t going to be better.
Precisely the point of the conversation. And if this is so difficult to estimate in the simplest and most common of defensive actions, than how much harder to measure countering interactions
State practice in offensive cyber countervalue targeting of objects of military - economic potential have defined international norms far more decisively than any number of aspirational prohibitions. This is the agreed fight, whether we like it or not.
inattention (where any further implant is good enough for immediate purpose, so why waste time thinking and just grab first tool to hand).
intrusion workloads as consequence of earlier ops being burned. But case is confounded by the likelihood that this may be just individual operator preference, error (especially for those with limited skill on keyboard following conditional checklists), or
It is tempting to think that adversary actors exploiting BeyondTrust may getting nervous about possible attention following headline disclosures, & are rotating in other similar tooling for survivability. This would be an excellent example of discrete, measurable reaction suggesting additional
or any such asset. What else?
One wonders what is so critical that GUGI recover, or destroy in place, when diving on the sunken hulk of a smugglers' vessel lost due to poor maintenance, incompetence in wartime retreat. As a first impression, one might assume exquisite cryptographic material, but this is table stakes
A ransomware crew claiming hits on multiple medical targets, including hospital and psychiatric practices, and also hitting a historic convent operating since 1578, very much tells you what kind of scum you are facing off against.
of control in every enterprise. This is authoritarian state power exercised directly.
Framing Chinese government interactions with RedNote as meetings with “government relations” to discuss “concerns”, as if these were ordinary Western lobbyists, is a fundamental analytic error. The Communist Party issued orders to a subordinate Party cell, mandated as a mechanism
in formally accredited programs, on the same topics.
of university intelligence studies degrees for the requirement. Whatever one thinks about the value, or lack thereof, of certs it is odd to see equivalence made between what is at best 40 engagement hours vice somewhere between 1300 to 3600 program hours demanded
One knows job markets are tough for those coming into the game, but distortions are becoming ever weirder. Saw a billet circulating for what is essentially an entry level analytic role that demanded specific intelligence professional certification, explicitly rejecting substitution
This is not a post about rockets. 🚀
and then driving those choices to the breaking point in testing. Because nothing else will so clearly demonstrate what is absolutely critical to success, and where one’s abstract view of hard choices needs to change in the face of unforgiving pressure. There are lessons here.
an endless series of choices that balance tradeoffs of necessary and desired characteristics. One can spend years to decades analyzing these to find optimized solution sets, and these will still be imperfect. But down in Texas they are taking best estimates,
The number of commentators that still don’t understand what they are watching when they see SpaceX launches is surprising. But this is so different from how most bureaucratic impulses function it deserves explanation. Every operational act requires
One wonders what 74455 will do to commemorate the passing of Monsieur Lynch.
It is regrettable that something so important as cyber would be reduced to a last minute afterthought of an executive order that is essentially for all political purposes, & operational outcomes, dead on arrival. There was no need for this, especially in this manner.
A startup announcing its progress, and further funding rounds, towards thylacine de-extinction is precisely the future @GreatDismal anticipated. Would getting one be seen as too klept adjacent of an aesthetic and therefore gauche?
...through deliberate deception, or restructuring of transactional capabilities generation options.