I am pretty sure you could get Marco Rubio to sell his mother to Fidel Castro if you used a vaguely harsh tone.

I have deeply bad news for you.

Ok. But...sorta.

There are a lot of questions for Residency about your families activities and any participation you have in it that can make you inadmissible.

Today on "The immigration system has always been unimaginably horrific"

I notice you have yet to respond to my good faith logic based question.

A man might think you are avoiding facts on purpose.

No but..you know what? Let's give all cops cyber trucks.

I feel like whoever wrote this for him was making fun of him.

Legal reaserch also offers lovely things such as... "Partially Wrong"

Such as "This is a valid interpretation for this set of facts. But there are other valid interpretations and I need to find the one most likely to be accepted by this particular tester"

Mal, I feel like this was a very "not feelings" based question. One you seem to be ignoring. That feels a bit devious of you. Is there no interest for an actual discussion based on facts?

Why would they do that? Miller already implemented most of the policies from it.

As you can see they weren't very good.

You know what, let's bite. How do you square your philosophy with a lawyers duty of candor, duty to the court and ethical obligations to their client and rule of law?

They already do that one. It's Light or Lelouch or no dice.

I think everyone I work with is either neurodivergant, has addiction problems, or trauma.

I don't imagine other law offices are different.

Oh so this is work? Please explain to my neurodivergant ass how. Try to sound like an anime villain while you do for bonus points.

I see. Do you consider the ability to use language to communicate inherently devious because that would explain a lot. Would it help if you imagined me with an overly long sword and trilby?

Would you believe it wasn't even a problem for Biden's shitty bill?

I do remember how much Biden and Harris sucked on the end there immigration wise, and how silly it was for them to try to out racist Trump.

Going to create "Um Actually, Malice" as the new standard.

As someone who knows a disproportionately large amount of lawyers, if I had to trust either a random lawyer I know with unlocked phone for a day or you with my drink for 5 minutes.

Well I guess I will see your response tomorrow.

This is true. Fabulously wealthy. Sometimes my wife and I can put an egg in our ramen and everything

The topic is "I think everything a court says is true"

The court says the people ICE brought in were deportable.

So do you agree with the court or can courts be wrong?

Hey Whisky.

Are the people ruled in EOIR to be deportable rightly deportable?

Or will you dodge this one too?

The machine which lies to you lied to you

Quelle surprise.

Today I learn my job is a hobby.

I mean considering she automatically agrees with every court case she must support ICE since everyone who got deported deserved it right?

a group of cartoon characters are standing in front of a christmas tree and looking surprised . ALT: a group of cartoon characters are standing in front of a christmas tree and looking surprised .

While this is true, it's extra true on account of...

Ok. But we can ask for better. And his last year made Biden the worst non-Trump president on immigration in my lifetime.

I have to disagree. The first 3 years were a flawed left of center policy that did try metering and border control but was also making efforts to help. He did a lot of fed reg stuff that helped.

Mind you Dubya was still better but Biden was ok his first 3 and bad his last.

All of this is true yeah but Biden did stop using it as a punitive measure and made more effort to get unaccompanied minors out of the system and to family members at a decent speed.

Not great. But not awful in this regard.

The machine that lies lies to you?