Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by James

Post image Post image

Well we do have naming from the time which seems to be agreed upon by both inhabitants and neighbours!

And all the peoples there seem to be descended from them, albeit the Lebanese and Christians/Druze most closely given less mixing.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

This is neutral and objective - the region was Canaan in 1500BC. The Peleset don't arrive until the Bronze Age Collapse several hundred years later.

2 months ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

Canaan is the historically accurate name for the region during the Bronze Age, though - calling it Palestine is like referring to Roman Britain as "England".

The Canaanites are the common ancestor of all the southern Levantine people.

2 months ago 2 1 0 0

No, it was Canaan at this point in time. This is several hundred years before the Peleset (where Palestine comes from) arrived in Canaan.

The Canaanites are the common ancestor of all the people in the region, both Levantine "arabs" and Jews.

2 months ago 1 0 2 0

The BM is correct: the lower Levant was "Canaan" in the Bronze Age from at least 1800BC. The first use of "Peleset" appears around 1170BC, as one of the sea peoples from the Aegean who settle in Canaan. Using "Palestine" is like calling Roman Britain "English".

2 months ago 4 2 1 1
Post image

Spooks on the BBC: “We have to climb onto the roof, through a skylight and plug this thumb drive into the Chinese server.”

Spooks on Chinese TV: “We’ve just bought the British data centre. Job done.”

6 months ago 106 42 5 12

If you want to stop being "in hock" to bond markets, run a balanced book.

It's pure maths - forecast inflation, interest rates, GDP, FX etc, work out required rate, if you can't get it, buy something else (like US bonds.)

Can't be "punished" if you don't keep asking to borrow lots of money.

6 months ago 0 0 0 0

Paint in / around a jet engine can cause catastrophic failure at high speeds by destabilising blades, breaking off to damage internal components, or blocking cooling holes.

It's not just a minor cosmetic issue, it's life-endangering sabotage - even if the culprits don't realise.

9 months ago 3 0 1 0

Deeply confusing, the world's most happy and successful democracies largely have Kings, it's the Republics that seem to be struggling...

10 months ago 2 0 1 0
Advertisement

The lack of safety net combined with the huge career sacrifices needed to even run do put lots of people without secure incomes off.

"Why we get the wrong politicians" is essential reading if you want any idea why our politics is going so wrong.

10 months ago 1 0 0 0

Not exactly going to be balanced and objective, is it.

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

This is adorable and wholesome 🥰

10 months ago 2 0 0 0

The Chagossians were leading the opposition to this deal?

10 months ago 0 0 0 0

I fear we're starting to hit the buffers... early data not looking good.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Haha never had to work there, it's just soulless vs the City with cute medieval alleys in between the skyscrapers.

Say hi when you visit!

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

Canary wharf though? Worst bit!

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Yeah, this tells me you don't really understand this.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

I am right legally, it has never been part of Mauritius, and it's a vital strategic base. I don't give a shit about your weird self-flagellating imperial apologism.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0
Advertisement

Lmao, the "left" were correct too, but it felt more contrite to give the credit to my genuine opposition 🥲

But "far" is wildly overused in most politics chat for people who are basically in the general centre.

1 year ago 0 0 0 0

What the fuck are you on about?

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

I think we need to be clear about this. The Chagos advisory opinion is not legally binding on any conception of international law. It's literally what the Charter of the United Nations says.

1 year ago 17 1 0 0

Ngl I thought they might use some budget for helping people or building stuff rather than giving it all to Mauritius.

Hate to admit the far left were entirely right on Starmer.

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Uhhhh... yeah, been British for 200 years, still is!

1 year ago 1 0 1 0

Nothing wrong with a nice suit :(

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

Sorry, but this is rank dishonesty. The deal has evolved substantially just in the last 2 months. We're now talking £18bn to give away our territory with almost no safeguards.

Even the harshest critic of Truss/Sunak couldn't content this was their approach. Bush utterly dishonest.

1 year ago 1 0 2 0
Advertisement

Debate on this site is just extraordinarily vacuous.

The deal is absolutely terrible. Truss was moronic opening it, Cameron wise to stop it.

DG is one of the most important military bases in the world, and our idealism is being exploited to give it up and *pay for the privilege*. Starmer insane.

1 year ago 1 0 0 0

Failing here is good. We shouldn't be giving away sovereign british territory.

1 year ago 0 0 1 0

All credit to Jim, he’s doing something genuinely interesting here with @londoncentric.media.

Clever media upstarts should be considering a similar model for Manchester, Birmingham and beyond…

1 year ago 11 3 0 0

What about circles?

1 year ago 3 0 1 0
Post image Post image

Gorgeous walk in Belgravia yesterday, the dense urban aesthetic Britain deserves.

Not everyone in the pub seemed to be having a much fun, alas...

1 year ago 11 0 0 0