14. That the Republican party is opposed to any change in our naturalization laws or any state legislation by which the rights of citizens hitherto accorded to immigrants from foreign lands shall be abridged or impaired; and in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.
Real history is understanding that the Republican Party of the 1860s was genuinely radical in favor of immigrant rights and an expansive view of citizenship. This is from the 1860 Republican platform.
1 week ago
3
0
0
0
Where should we put General Provisions?
Title VII with all the hyperspecific provisions about briefs, of course
1 month ago
3
0
0
0
A minor pet peeve: Voluntary dismissal is FRCP 41 and FRAP 42. Why can’t they have moved the numbering to sync up?
1 month ago
7
0
1
0
I was just thinking the same thing reading through the rule
1 month ago
8
0
1
0
That was the most intense hour of television in my life
2 months ago
0
0
0
0
Regardless of whether you like superhero stuff, Wonder Man on Disney+ is an absolute mindless/silly delight, with an all-time great bromance between Ben Kingsley and Yaha Abdul Mateen
2 months ago
1
0
0
0
Advertisement
Maryland’s justices wearing red robes on Thursday and black robes on Friday
What a difference a day makes! The Supreme Court of Maryland appears yo have switched to black robes except for special occasions (like yesterday’s opening day)
mdappblog.com/2025/09/05/m...
7 months ago
8
1
2
1
This makes for interesting timing as the Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference starts today
9 months ago
3
0
0
0
In “things I’ve never seen before,” the Trump administration is suing Maryland’s federal district judges—challenging the standing order the district court put in place that briefly bars removals of migrants after they initially file habeas petitions there:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
9 months ago
751
220
25
11
McSweeney's: New York Times’ Style Guide Substitutions for "The President Violated the Constitution" www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/new...
10 months ago
2620
809
70
53
WOW
Fourth Circuit holds that a jurisdiction-stripping statute depends on a functioning Merit Systems Protections Board and Special Counsel. Because we don’t have those, the Court remands to decide whether court has jurisdiction
www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/232...
10 months ago
9
2
0
1
Advertisement
Target's bold "Pride" collection this year features a colorless hoodie with the words "Out Loud & Proud" written teeny tiny only the string.
10 months ago
6425
1091
28
1275
UVA Sign-On Letter
Please click the link to complete this form.
UVA’s President Jim Ryan is an exemplary leader and educator and I’m so proud to work here. Please sign on to show your support and combat the absurd disinformation that UVA is in decline. The opposite under President Ryan’s leadership is true. We are thriving. form.jotform.com/251478017358...
10 months ago
5
4
3
3
Seeing as Emil Bove personally fired me from DOJ in retaliation for prosecuting January 6 rioters, I don’t think he should be confirmed to a lifetime seat as a federal judge. But that’s just me.
10 months ago
5901
1568
119
38
That movie was the scourge of HBO when I was a kid
10 months ago
2
0
1
0
Obi Wan: Now that’s a time zone I haven’t heard in a long time
10 months ago
15
0
1
0
The All Writs Act permits courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of
their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 1651(a). Further, the Supreme Court recognizes “a limited judicial power to preserve the
court’s jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by injunction pending review of an agency’s action
through the prescribed statutory channels.” F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966)
(citing cases). Accordingly, in order to preserve existing conditions and the potential jurisdiction
of this Court over pending matters while the Court determines the scope of its authority to grant
the request relief; to ensure Petitioners are able to participate in the adjudication of their requests
for habeas relief, including participation in court proceedings and access to legal counsel for
such purpose; to ensure the Court is able to evaluate their respective claims for relief based on
their in-court testimony that may be offered; and to ensure the Government has a fulsome
opportunity to brief and present arguments in its defense, it is hereby
ORDERED by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland that upon the
filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on behalf of an alien
detainee, the Government/Respondents, including all those acting for them or on their behalf, are
ENJOINED and RESTRAINED from removing Petitioners in such cases from the continental
United States or altering their legal status, provided that Petitioner’s full name and A# have been
provided to the Court, either in the Petition or in a separate sealed filing
Maryland federal court issues a standing order automatically staying removals for two business days upon filing of a habeas petition with name and alien ID number
www.mdd.uscourts.gov/sites/mdd/fi...
10 months ago
2
0
0
0
Advertisement
Cato has published my comprehensive review of the ~240 Venezuelans the US government renditioned 2 months ago to Salvador’s notorious prison. We identified FIFTY who came legally, never violated any immigration law, but are imprisoned at the US government’s request and at US taxpayer expense.
11 months ago
11165
5401
254
511
Trump admin in Judge Xinis’s courtroom is like a poorly programmed contempt chatbot.
11 months ago
332
39
6
0