Which one?

The result was gun manufacturers lobbying Congress to make it illegal to use federal money to do any kind of study on guns and gun violence.

The book "Dying of Whiteness" explains how in 1992 a federally funded study concluded that the risk of suicide increases so dramatically in the presence of a gun that it concluded that the owners should seriously consider the cost of owning a gun.

Did it stop? Because now we're killing even more Muslims for Israel.

And yet this is exactly the shit the single minded "activists" keep throwing us into. We got sold out for Palestine and didn't even get Palestine in the end.

Human rights? Like those of immigrants? Or those suffering under the quackery of conversion therapy? Or Black people and their right to representation?

The people who want to throw everyone else under the bus first in the name of their current obsession.

Depends on what the algorithm thinks will keep you engaged. It leans "relitigate Stalin" for me.

That was after they started to accuse liberals of being on the Epstein Flight Logs, too

And if they did would you pay attention?

I do know. I know how you and so many leftists have failed to reach the ridiculously low bar of "Better than Liz Cheney."

Right now the left, like Omar, is embracing a person who said that Jews are lighting wildfires with space lasers.

Now *that* is an insult. Sorry Cheney understood the assignment but you didn't.

Canadians would know about genocide. Just ask their indigenous people.

"Accelerationism cannot fail. It can only make life not quite awful enough for people less privileged than myself."

John Brown would have voted for Kamala Harris with pride, knowing that not only are Black people human but also worthy of holding office. Brown violently hated slavery for how it dehumanized African Americans and often involved them in his plots.

So very smart of you to have other people think for you.

"U mad" but BlueSky

I got told by someone using this image as a PFP about how Harris ran a bad campaign and got very defensive when I told them that voters chose the candidate.

You said a lot that could just mean that Liz Cheney, the warmonger whose political career failed still has better judgement than the median leftist.

Not against me. I'm just judging everyone against Liz Cheney because she is such a low bar. And yet, people who use cliches like if they're clever zingers still fall short.

It hurts when Liz Cheney is a better person than the median "leftist", doesn't it

I'm not punching left. I'm punching right.

Want to break their brains? Tell them that they're to the right of Liz Cheney because she wanted to stop Trump.

So if the candidate who opposed him had, for example, successfully sued a major auto manufacturer for tens of billions of dollars for falsifying emissions data, would they still be a neoliberal corporatist Democrat?

But are you aware about the Black woman's laugh?

Maybe Jake Tapper will write a book about it

So you're going to be intimidated by the Republicans but not the Democrats. Coward.

Functionally? Yes. I saw some polling that the non-voters would have gone for Trump, too.

But you can't gloat about how you helped defeat Harris and how she deserved to lose and then smol bean your way out.