Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by dog

**Q. You want to raise every boy as a girl?**
Yes.

**Q. Why?**
A boy will learn to hate girls as long as he is raised in such a way where he is treated as better, and superior to, his girl peers, whenever he is cruel to girls. So, instead, we raise boys as girls.

**Q. What if they say they are not a girl, and want to be acknowledged as a boy?**
Then you know they are a boy, so you must make sure to understand them as a boy, and not a girl. 

**Q. What does it mean to be 'raised as a girl'?**
That's up for you to decide. The only difference is that you should not raise boys any differently than you raise girls, since you raise every boy as a girl.

**Q. Girls and boys are raised in specific ways for specific purposes, so it does not make sense to raise boys as girls.**
If you raise every boy as a girl, then there is no being which is not raised as a girl, so anyone raised as a girl necessarily must learn to do anything and everything to grow up, without restrictions on tasks, labours, or interests.

**Q. But boys and girls are different.**
All two girls are different, and raising girls in one specific way destroys this individuality in favour of moulding girls to serve the same master. Still, the girls resist to live life on their own terms. If girls can be raised such that they know they can do anything they want, including not being girls, so too will boys raised as girls. 

**Q. Why not raise every girl as a boy?**
Because if a girl does not exist among boys, then the girl is made. 

**Q. Why not raise girls and boys as themselves?**
The self must be made in a world where girls and boys can first and foremost be themselves. One step towards this goal is to raise every boy as a girl. 

**Q. The way people raise girls is cruel, so why would you raise boys with that cruelty?**
If you raise girls with cruelty, then you should stop being cruel to girls.

**Q. You want to raise every boy as a girl?** Yes. **Q. Why?** A boy will learn to hate girls as long as he is raised in such a way where he is treated as better, and superior to, his girl peers, whenever he is cruel to girls. So, instead, we raise boys as girls. **Q. What if they say they are not a girl, and want to be acknowledged as a boy?** Then you know they are a boy, so you must make sure to understand them as a boy, and not a girl. **Q. What does it mean to be 'raised as a girl'?** That's up for you to decide. The only difference is that you should not raise boys any differently than you raise girls, since you raise every boy as a girl. **Q. Girls and boys are raised in specific ways for specific purposes, so it does not make sense to raise boys as girls.** If you raise every boy as a girl, then there is no being which is not raised as a girl, so anyone raised as a girl necessarily must learn to do anything and everything to grow up, without restrictions on tasks, labours, or interests. **Q. But boys and girls are different.** All two girls are different, and raising girls in one specific way destroys this individuality in favour of moulding girls to serve the same master. Still, the girls resist to live life on their own terms. If girls can be raised such that they know they can do anything they want, including not being girls, so too will boys raised as girls. **Q. Why not raise every girl as a boy?** Because if a girl does not exist among boys, then the girl is made. **Q. Why not raise girls and boys as themselves?** The self must be made in a world where girls and boys can first and foremost be themselves. One step towards this goal is to raise every boy as a girl. **Q. The way people raise girls is cruel, so why would you raise boys with that cruelty?** If you raise girls with cruelty, then you should stop being cruel to girls.

3 weeks ago 3833 1206 47 55
Post image

MASSIVE WIN: no one wants to live in the united states anymore

3 weeks ago 11675 1673 313 131
A small, green frog on old red brick steps.

A small, green frog on old red brick steps.

3 weeks ago 90 11 2 0
Captain Crunch “oops all berries” cereal box but captain crunch is replaced with Karl Weierstrauss, the box says “Oops! All non-differentiable”, and the graph of the Weierstrauss function is superimposed atop the berries.

Captain Crunch “oops all berries” cereal box but captain crunch is replaced with Karl Weierstrauss, the box says “Oops! All non-differentiable”, and the graph of the Weierstrauss function is superimposed atop the berries.

3 weeks ago 2 0 0 0
Dog’s Eye Gunk Wiped Back On Dog

Dog’s Eye Gunk Wiped Back On Dog

Dog’s Eye Gunk Wiped Back On Dog

3 weeks ago 1437 171 19 14

Idk what your background is but “participation points and no student can fail” is not remotely connected to reality in my experience

3 weeks ago 7 0 3 0
Goldman Sachs reports that 300 million full-time jobs could be replaced by AI by 2030. Labor turnover is high and hiring has slowed. 71% of Americans worry that AI will cause permanent job loss. As young people about to enter the workforce for the first time, the fear of unemployment is understandable, but we cannot save ourselves with the very tool that is putting us at risk.

The irony is that as Penn pours endless money and energy into AI advancement in its attempt to get ahead, the University is only quickening its own demise. AI cannot coexist with education — it can only degrade it. As technology advances and workers are replaced by machines, schools are some of the only places we have left to explore and wrestle with human thought. With our own university leading the charge, AI is now corrupting those few sacred spaces and leaving us with nowhere to engage in true scholarship. 

Editorials represent the majority view of members of The Daily Pennsylvanian Editorial Board who meet regularly to discuss issues relevant to the Penn community. This body is led by Editorial Board Chair Jack Lakis and is entirely separate from the newsroom. Questions or comments should be directed to letters@thedp.com.

Goldman Sachs reports that 300 million full-time jobs could be replaced by AI by 2030. Labor turnover is high and hiring has slowed. 71% of Americans worry that AI will cause permanent job loss. As young people about to enter the workforce for the first time, the fear of unemployment is understandable, but we cannot save ourselves with the very tool that is putting us at risk. The irony is that as Penn pours endless money and energy into AI advancement in its attempt to get ahead, the University is only quickening its own demise. AI cannot coexist with education — it can only degrade it. As technology advances and workers are replaced by machines, schools are some of the only places we have left to explore and wrestle with human thought. With our own university leading the charge, AI is now corrupting those few sacred spaces and leaving us with nowhere to engage in true scholarship. Editorials represent the majority view of members of The Daily Pennsylvanian Editorial Board who meet regularly to discuss issues relevant to the Penn community. This body is led by Editorial Board Chair Jack Lakis and is entirely separate from the newsroom. Questions or comments should be directed to letters@thedp.com.

An unaccounted for part of the economy is how much young people virulently hate AI, despite how aggressively it's being forced on them. They realize it's making their friends dumber and ruining the world and they want nothing to do with it.

From the Penn student paper:
www.thedp.com/article/2026...

3 weeks ago 7118 2019 155 157

The kind of person to buy and wear these is exactly who you think it is. Arrogant douchebag tech bro who thinks of himself as an “AI pioneer” or something.

(I am describing someone I have the misfortune to know personally… 🥀)

1 month ago 1 1 0 0
Advertisement

How much of your search history is just [thing] followed by [thing math]?

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

Android correcting “Cauchy Euler” to “Catchy Eller” 🥀

1 month ago 2 0 0 0

I’m reclusive and introverted but people often mistake this as antisocial which sucks :( I like people!! I’m just shy and it takes less effort to be alone

1 month ago 25 1 0 0
Post image Post image

did i ever cross-post my pokemon AU stuff here
#ocsky

1 month ago 1240 340 8 2

He wants you to have a nice day :)

2 months ago 5363 1100 41 9
an edited version of the original image, replacing "Asia Launch" with "We Nuked Singapore"

an edited version of the original image, replacing "Asia Launch" with "We Nuked Singapore"

7 months ago 738 330 14 17
Post image

comm for
@/JackJiJiJiJiJiJ(X)

1 month ago 1688 317 8 1

Uploading to ArXiv is not “publishing a paper”. It’s posting an essay. It isn’t a paper until it’s been peer reviewed and published by a reputable publication.

(Fuck you, AI bros. You are not scientists, engineers, or any other role associated with service or thought.)

1 month ago 1 0 0 0

This happened because you (you personally, Scott, as management at microsoft) mandated that your people try to find a use for generative AI to justify all the spend, but it just isn't useful. Some poor intern tried to use it to create this documentation and this is the best it could do.

2 months ago 61 9 0 1

“Piezo buzzer” (it was not piezo)

2 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
Video

This is actually quite brilliant, up to and including the final sentence 🔥

4 months ago 27735 10807 549 931
Post image
2 months ago 2186 534 9 1
Definition of a subgroup

Definition of a subgroup

LaTeX

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

You don’t have to force your thoughts into a standard template if you already have a natural way to put them (grumbling about cover letters)

2 months ago 1 0 0 0

Hemingway wrote largely in dialogue due to his experience as a journalist. “Hills Like White Elephants” is a classic example and it reads very naturally

2 months ago 0 0 0 0

Whenever I think we’ve hit rock-bottom stupidity, The Atlantic publishes and reveals new levels of inane horseshit.

4 months ago 2 0 0 0

This is the sickest, most brutal takedown I have ever seen. Crazy that it was seen as praise and put on the cover

4 months ago 0 0 0 0

Spiritual warfare is lighting a candle to burn down your hedge of protection

4 months ago 2 0 0 0
Advertisement
Video

I like whatever is wrong with my algorithm over there

4 months ago 16345 6007 148 298

checking gives the crossitive inverse ;3

5 months ago 1 0 0 0
The "top lookups" on the Merrian-Webster dictionary website, refreshed every thirty seconds. In descending other, they are:
1. fascism
2. emolument
3. complacent
4. apeling
5. Planipennia
6. lagniappe
7. try

The "top lookups" on the Merrian-Webster dictionary website, refreshed every thirty seconds. In descending other, they are: 1. fascism 2. emolument 3. complacent 4. apeling 5. Planipennia 6. lagniappe 7. try

This is lots of fun to watch.

6 months ago 2 0 0 0

Oh it’s Tylenol. Fuck me I guess.

6 months ago 1 0 0 0