When your titles include things like
"Vicar of Christ"
"Regent of God on Earth"
"Successor to rhe Prince of the Apostles"
It's not YOU who has to prove you knoe what you're talking about
Posts by Dan Izzo
Also just...telling the POPE to be careful about matters of theology.
The Pope, Bishop of Rome, Vicar of Christ, Regent of God on Earth, Successor of the Prince of the Apostles, Supreme Pontiff of the Universal Church...
EXCOMMUNICATION! Come on Leo...DO IT!
Nope...you must decipher the Code of the Ancients
I believe she does now
It's like...he's not WRONG but he's also SO FAR OFF
Yeah she says that in the video "maybe I shouldn't be doing that either"
I wasn't aware hot water bottles were still so popular but check them folks.
And maybe they should consider just printing an expiration date on them instead of what is basically a system of hierglyphics.
You are and incredibly dense human being.
They're fine with this. Prefer it actually. Illegal immigrants can serve as a permanent slave underclass when they're detained.
Legal immigrants are harder to do that with.
Was gonna say, your heart may love it. Your spine on the other hand.
Except what I described isn't being "anti-Israeli" it's diving deep into "Jewish money runs the world" antisemitism.
If.I'm Crown Prince Bone Saw I'm REALLY rehinking some of the investments I've made into Donald J Trump.
Finished The Demon King by @pvbrett.bsky.social yesterday. Great conclusion to a great series.
Hope there's more to come in the universe to.
bsky.app/profile/izzo...
If DoorDash could just roll up to the White House the opportunity to prank Trump would be immense.
The only process he is due is whatever process the House Rules require for expulsion.
That's it. That's what "due process" means. You're entitled to the process spelled out in the relevant rules or laws as applicable.
It's not some specific defined set of things in the Constitution.
You are mistaken "political system" with the "criminal justice system."
It is literally the logical outcome of your statement.
You don't get to say "I didn't say that" just because you didn't say the specific words.
What process is a politician legally due under the law before you decide whether to vote for them?
You put ALL politicians through the same evaluation right?
"For all his talk about how he's super Christian Pete seems to have not read the parts of the Bible Jesus is actually IN. He might be surprised about what he finds in there"
At this point if you're on SubStack you might as well also fire up a Twitter account.
Oh for the love of.
I promise it's really NOT hard to not act like a total creep. It really isn't.
Not to mention that if she DID have an OnlyFans the same dipshit would be degrading her BECAUSE she had one.
...who is "you guys"
Cause I was born in New York, lived there till I went to college in Maryland, then law school in Virginia, lived in either MD or VA since
Oh...and given that I'm Irish-Italian by heritage you get two guesses at my religion.
Pretty much.
It depends...
And tons of highly credible, absolutely known to be true things, can also be inadmissible.
Admissibility is only tangentially connected to credibility.
For someone being "silenced" she sure seems to be able to say a lot.
Right. But we're also talking about that people aren't limited to only "trial admissible evidence" when making their own judgments about Swalwell.