Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Ben S

It's also the strategy error: very mad she wasted a slam-dunk tax like this on the basketcase of SDP

6 hours ago 0 0 1 0

The mayor might actually be cooked here, and her poor comms strategy is mostly to blame

6 hours ago 2 0 2 0

To be fair RTM was not known for cheesesteaks until very recently! (Campo's used to have a stand there?)

7 hours ago 1 0 1 0

A subtle reminder of how this worked out last time: “Mr. Trump said he’d wanted to own the shuttle for years because he likes the idea of owning it. It was not a financial decision as far as I can tell” www.aerotime.aero/articles/260...

8 hours ago 7 1 0 0

Many people don't even understand the concept of rent-seeking or secretly like doing it themselves. (But we must try!)

8 hours ago 1 0 0 0

Because the SDP needs the City's permission to do that and the City does not want to think about these hard choices (rideshare tax already hard enough)

8 hours ago 0 0 0 0
Post image

ever wonder why your bus is waiting for a green light? excited to share a big work project milestone (and kudos to the team who delivered this) - the first ever California Open Transit Signal Priority Metrics, a key rulebook on how to evaluate the operational performance dot.ca.gov/cal-itp/tsp-...

10 hours ago 17 7 2 0
Advertisement

It always ends up being about appealing to preservation doesn't it? (The preservation regs here can keep home values down but it's through disrepair, which is hardly fair and fails to work under extreme demand)

11 hours ago 1 0 1 0

Sorry I should have said design-build, but even if that breakdown was given it could theoretically all be censored because of the "trade secrets" exemption

12 hours ago 0 0 1 0

I guess "Base Contract" cost breakdown is not subject to FOIA because of the P3 structure?

12 hours ago 0 0 1 0

I think there's a pretty clear correlation between general project features ("one-stop end of line extension") and the accompanying scope to deliver it; streetscapes will bundle multiple purposes together but they can also be disentangled

13 hours ago 1 0 0 0

FOIA requests for the cost schedules to begin with

13 hours ago 1 0 1 0
13 hours ago 22 2 0 0
Post image

Streetscape civils are a lot simpler than transit though and there are cost history databases that exist to compare to. It's just that fewer people have been interested in studying and comparing projects

13 hours ago 6 0 2 0

In my experience the maintenance reason predominates over the aesthetics one, which is compounded when the trolleybus substations aren't the same as rail substations (lack thereof or otherwise)

13 hours ago 3 0 0 0

(this is because roadway engineering is really groundwater engineering in disguise and because of impervious surface our roads become mini-drainage canals)

16 hours ago 3 0 0 0
Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

Berkeley traffic diverter

The Berkeley traffic diverter:

As peasants in the Dark Ages looked upon the Roman aqueducts arching above, today's engineers can only gaze in wonderment at the awesome works of their forebears.

This mysterious technology, once thrown up with ease and abandon, is wholly lost to modernity.

1 day ago 81 13 6 4
Advertisement

this article convinced me that the tax should be $10

1 day ago 959 70 7 0
More to come; but the 15th Street Bike Lanes will stay for now!! Here's the conclusion of the 61 page decision ... THANK YOU for your support! Wanted you to hear it from us first ... 

CONCLUSION

The Court finds the decision to proceed with the 15th Street Cycle Track Removal to be
arbitrary and capricious because the record does not reflect that the defendants examined the
relevant data and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.
It further finds that the defendants’ invocation of the highway modernization categorical exclusion,
and their conclusion that the Removal Project would not have a significant impact on public health
and safety, to be arbitrary and capricious as well. Therefore, the decision to proceed with the
Removal Project as described in the March 31, 2026 NPS Decision Memorandum and the March
31, 2026 NPS and FHWA Categorial Exclusion documents, as well as in the February 23 NPS and
February 27 FHWA Categorical Exclusion documents to the extent they were not rescinded or
nullified but only elaborated upon on March 31, is hereby VACATED and REMANDED to the
National Park Service and the Federal Highway Administration. This means, as counsel for the
defendants acknowledged on the record at the hearing, that the decision is null and void, and the
Removal Project may not and will not proceed on April 23, 2026. Given the ruling in plaintiff’s
favor on the merits, plaintiff’s request for interim relief is denied as MOOT.

More to come; but the 15th Street Bike Lanes will stay for now!! Here's the conclusion of the 61 page decision ... THANK YOU for your support! Wanted you to hear it from us first ... CONCLUSION The Court finds the decision to proceed with the 15th Street Cycle Track Removal to be arbitrary and capricious because the record does not reflect that the defendants examined the relevant data and articulated a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made. It further finds that the defendants’ invocation of the highway modernization categorical exclusion, and their conclusion that the Removal Project would not have a significant impact on public health and safety, to be arbitrary and capricious as well. Therefore, the decision to proceed with the Removal Project as described in the March 31, 2026 NPS Decision Memorandum and the March 31, 2026 NPS and FHWA Categorial Exclusion documents, as well as in the February 23 NPS and February 27 FHWA Categorical Exclusion documents to the extent they were not rescinded or nullified but only elaborated upon on March 31, is hereby VACATED and REMANDED to the National Park Service and the Federal Highway Administration. This means, as counsel for the defendants acknowledged on the record at the hearing, that the decision is null and void, and the Removal Project may not and will not proceed on April 23, 2026. Given the ruling in plaintiff’s favor on the merits, plaintiff’s request for interim relief is denied as MOOT.

WABA WON

1 day ago 79 26 0 4

New faregates are great, but the decade-long saga it took for several agencies to stumble towards the right design while e.g. PATCO had paddle gates since 2007 is downright shameful and a waste of millions to venders

1 day ago 15 1 0 0

Minneapolis Skyway is also a good one, a surprising amount of higher-story shops

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

Surely she has never had to think about costs and pay-fors before working for a nonprofit!

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

This comparison makes so much sense lmao

1 day ago 8 0 1 0

Spandrels are so back

1 day ago 1 0 0 0

Yeah it needed to go to 5 segments because of the tunnel clearance envelope at curves, the SEPTA model is very customized

1 day ago 1 0 1 0

Yes, there is no other 3+ segment LRV I know of with only 2 bogies

1 day ago 1 0 1 0

Adding two more 90-degree curves in regular service is a maintenance increase, plus that block of 42nd are constantly blocked by cars/trucks (personal experience)

1 day ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement

80 ft is the maximum length one can platform a trolley at 40th St Portal, because it will have to be reconfigured to eliminate the T2 inbound curve

1 day ago 1 0 2 0

I guess it's in walking distance to the station, but if they're saving the closest parcels for a garage I'm gonna be so triggered

1 day ago 3 0 0 0
Preview
Sacramento’s most legendary parking enforcement officer gave out 22,000 tickets last year 2025 marked another outstanding year for Parking Enforcement Officer Grant Nakamura, the hardest-working man in Sacramento.

“No infraction seems to escape him. Nakamura can hear a meter expire in the night the way an owl hears a mouse across a snowy clearing in the woods…”

2 days ago 62 10 4 11