A valid one. 100% with Rob here.

We are looking for developers for a stealth startup in Stockholm is hiring a .NET/F# dev!
Focus: Functional Programming, GIS, AI/LLMs, Google Cloud.
Hybrid (3 days onsite). Open to consultants & FTEs.

👉 DM me for details

You can somewhat control Ableton via MIDI. Or whole macOS via the AppleScript?

What’s your setup?

What’s worse is that he has a bunch of followers who legitimately think that he’s right.

Glad it’s not only me. He is a bigot, he is toxic and can’t handle any criticism.

Saying that someone chose the wrong side of history makes it sound like a 50/50 accident.

Jonathan Blow is simply a racist dick. I will never play any of his games. I will literally rather quit programming than use Jai in any capacity. He can go fuck himself with a pitchfork.

What, worse than JavaScript?

Here is the recording for those who missed the session online #fsharp #oxpecker
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba2b...
bsky.app/profile/ampl...

My literal first thought is “this must be some sort of deepfake to make fun of him”. Nope.

So, if you want to use “dotnet fsi” to run scripts, you will need it on machine. So, have dotnet installed. You _probably_ only need runtime though, not sdk.

You also can host FSI session yourself, and then run any scripts there. In this case you can just do self-hosted for your app which hosts fsi

But there’s probably no way of natively compile FCS currently, I doubt NAOT compiler will manage to do it, a bunch of reflection- and (recursive)generic-heavy code there.

Application publishing - .NET Learn about the ways to publish a .NET application. .NET can publish platform-specific or cross-platform apps. You can publish an app as self-contained or as framework-dependent. Each mode affects how...

You can technically pack a self-contained app, but it will contain a runtime and needed dependencies. I have never tried it with FCS though.

learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet...

Wdym without the dependency on sdk? There’s compiler service (on top of which compiler is built). It has FSI sessions API. But to run it under normal circumstances, you’ll need a dotnet host. Alternative you can use fable, it will be JS. What are your environment and requirements?

The bell at Notre-Dame rings in F# 👌👍

Just sayin' 😉

Vive la France 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷 Thank you for all the beauty.

#fsharp

Compiler Explorer - F# module Program let square x = x * x

Did you know, that compiler explorer can do #dotnet? It can do JIT, Crossgen2, ILDasm and ILSpy? You can even compare codegen for different compiler versions, how cool is that?

godbolt.org/z/9EWhYbfv4

Ooh, next time you're here, I can show you a couple of really good non-touristy places!

Looks really great for #dotnet profiling

Oh. It seems I’ve missed it. I have to give it a shot! It looks really good!

Funnily enough, that was the very first task I did in F# team - new test framework. Proud of it :)

Nice. We have something similar in F#, looks like this:

These parts are more oop there, but I think it was essentially up to person who was writing that code.

Won’t be surprised either if Try* didn’t exist at the time this was written :D

In this case, I don’t think it’s worth it, we don’t care much whether we catch the exception or check existence and report a diagnostic. I suppose exception is more explicit.

Testing.Platform, the new way to run .NET tests YouTube video by dotnet

The recording of our talk on the new testing platform for .NET conf is now available on YouTube. If you haven't watched it yet, please have a look and give us feedback!
youtu.be/9Jz47Ze9LOI?...

Satanic #fsharp compiler confirmed!

I’m already here!

Celebrating the F# 9 Release: A Tribute to Our Contributors · Issue #17996 · dotnet/fsharp We would like to take a moment and thank all of our contributors and congratulate them with successful release of F# 9. F# is historically developed as a collaboration between the .NET Foundation, ...

A tribute to people, without whom F# 9 wouldn't have been possible:

github.com/dotnet/fshar...

Can't thank y'all enough!

Yeah, I didn’t like the change personally :( I think going forward it’ll be great to have independent posts in the repo as well, so we can control it. Or rather team going forward

Yes. Was out of team control unfortunately by the time.

IIRC folks insisted to have it all in one post, changes only. We should probably post a separate “post” to be pinned in repo issues/discussions, with details and shoutouts, and mention it in the post.