I do the same! Sometimes I cannot resist the urge to make a pun though

"Nice try!"

Should I make it a catchy title?

"IREPABA: I REviewed your PAper and it's BAd"

Openreview review form field saying "Give your review a short title"

I never understand what I'm supposed to write here

At #CHI2026 we are also presenting "StepDance: A Toolkit for Redesigning CNC Machines Using Physical Metaphors"

Curious how a machine-building novice like me can make a sketch-to-print machine?

checkout the talk on Friday >> programs.sigchi.org/chi/2026/pro...

or see thread...

Yes! I think so :) Thanks!

This is not what "opt in" means...

:(

I was going to say that because of this global / local difference it will be impossible to get a convex hull like this but.... wait! I missed the "recursively" part of your message. This is a fun idea!

Ah! Great. I think what you're encountering is that whether a vertex is inside the convex hull or not is a "global" property (meaning, it can depend on parts of the polygon arbitrarily far away), while its "convex/reflex" status is a "local" property (depends only on the neighboring polygon parts).

What is a "reflex point"?

brilliant

Short and to the pointless,

:/

I definitely would not say "reviewers agreed..." it seems a bit dangerous to put words on reviewers' mouths!

Btw you didn't have to quote me...

Oh my god it has happened!!!!!

Technical correspondence: comment on computer rendering of fractal stochastic models: Communications of the ACM: Vol 25, No 8

Technical Reading, Week 7: "Comment on Computer Rendering of Fractal Stochastic Models", Mandelbrot's angry letter to future Pixar folks about the crapola Genesis Sequence in Star Trek 2: Wrath of Khan.

(His views, not mine.)

dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...

Haha, came here to post this, but you beat me to it!

www.achewood.com/assets/img/0...

Yeah truly disgusting

yaledailynews.com/articles/gel...

If someone refers an undergraduate student to a known sex offender for a job, and includes a comment about how good-looking the student is in their recommendation letter, that someone should never be allowed to teach undergraduate students ever again.

!?!? book!?!?

Same here....

My Spanish degree worked like this too... though admittedly I hated those exams withe every fiber of my being

The CVPR review period is *Dec 18 to Jan 12*? Damn....

(FYI it seems like they no longer appear "by default" over abstracts, at least in the cases I've tested)

Screenshot of a paper entry: Fictional Failures and Real-World Lessons: Ethical Speculation Through Design Fiction on Emotional Support Conversational AI Authors: Faye Kollig, Jessica Pater, Fayika Farhat Nova, Casey Fiesler (There are tabs with "abstract" and "summary" and "summary" is selected.)

The ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.

This is really, really bad!