💥 Academic freedom - so important!
Please help our research team and take time for their survey:
Posts by Anna Lena Kahle
How strong is the threat to academic freedom? If you are a publishing psychologist, please help us get a better understanding of the threats due to external pressure and self-censorship in the publication process by taking our 5-10 min anonymous survey: t1p.de/t1qof
Results will be shared here!
Dear colleagues - we want to better understand perceptions of data fraud and its detection and need your support! Are you currently a #researcher in #psych (or related fields) working with #data? Perfect - please respond to & share this short study (7min): sosci.rlp.net/detection/?r... Thank you!! 🫶
🚨 Deadline tomorrow! 🚨
We have made public #openscience materials from the Münster Center for Open Science, specifically flyers and cheatsheets on #OpenAccess, #OpenData, and #Preregistration. Flyers are already on Zenodo, Cheatsheets will follow: zenodo.org/communities/muecos/ and lukasroeseler.github.io/MueCOS-Infom...
🫶By joining our team, you won’t just design curriculum — you’ll shape how thousands of scientists learn to do rigorous, trustworthy research. Imagine seeing a student halfway across the world use materials you created to strengthen their science. That kind of impact lasts.
Apply at: buff.ly/nJxjaKd
💡 The state of peer review today / with Mario Malički @mariomalicki.bsky.social
youtu.be/pHPNuYAZ7U8?...
An important write up from the NYT on the funding changes at the NIH.
www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Meme of cat reading a newspaper. Meme text: I should spend more time on the PYMS discord. Meme made by Nathanael Larigaldie
Our Discord just got an upgrade: we now have a dedicated meme channel 🎉
So besides sharing opportunities, events, your work, papers, and all things meta-science… there’s now room for memes and other funny content too!
Early-career and want to join? DM us!
(Meme by @nathlarigaldie.bsky.social)
📢 The acculturation debate continues: A Direct Response to John Berry's critique was just published in advances.in/psychology!
@kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social addresses recent criticisms and reveals crucial, overlooked findings from meta-analytical evidence.
advances.in/psychology/1...
Cambridge University Press conducted a survey on 2.8k researchers - 𝟓𝟎% 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐨𝐫 𝐪𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐚 𝐦𝐚𝐣𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦. www-cambridge-org.stanford.idm.oclc.org/us/universit...
Great work by @abitter.bsky.social @mariogollwitzer.bsky.social @kaisassenberg.bsky.social @t-1m.bsky.social et al. on FAIR data sharing in Psychology.
They also suggest 6 simple checks that can be implemented in the editorial process to improve data FAIRness.
@kbierwiaczonek.bsky.social
Next Monday (September 29th), Jessica Rohmann (@jlrohmann.bsky.social) & Toivo Glatz will give an interesting talk on Peerspectives, a researcher-led peer-review training course @zpid.bsky.social!
Join us at ZPID or online! More info and registration here: leibniz-psychology.org/en/products/...
Kicking-off her PhD journey, @wagunyego.bsky.social talked about her initial findings capturing epistemic injustice and its relationship to trust in science. So many interesting avenues to go from here, more exciting stuff coming over the course of the next years of her dissertation. #SciReLab
Join our upcoming webinars “Peer Review and its Diversification”!
📅 15-16 October 2025 on Zoom
👉 Registration: forms.gle/1R4Y3d33W8bQ...
📄 Full programme: docs.google.com/document/d/1...
#PeerReview #PeerReviewWeek #PRW2025 #metasci #academicsky
Happy to share that our #bibliometric analysis of #translational psychological treatment is now published OA in the latest issue of @apajournals.bsky.social's Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice! doi.org/10.1037/cps0...
Terminological inconsistency may threaten the progress of the field!
Excited to announce that my paper with @lpummerer.bsky.social, @sonja-utz.de & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social on conspiracy beliefs is published. We examined the relationship between conspiracy beliefs and procedural justice during the peak and decay of the pandemic.
How complete are preregistrations?
Short answer: 53% include all 6 procedural specifications
Medium answer: 🧵
Long answer: check out my publication with A. Glöckner @mariogollwitzer.bsky.social J. Hellmann, J. Lange, S. Schindler & @kaisassenberg.bsky.social
doi.org/10.1177/2515...
I’m excited to share my first first-authored paper with @abitter.bsky.social in the Journal of Happiness Studies:
“The Emotional Climate of Academia: Exploring Social Media Data as an Indicator of Well‑Being.”
📖 Read it here (OA): link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Fresh of the press! I'm incredibly proud of this new paper by Kiki Vu and myself where we show how much bias is introduced when people use workarounds to test interaction hypotheses meta-analytically. Check it out: advances.in/psychology/1...
Calling all #psych researchers!📢
We’re conducting a quick survey on #preregistration and will use your feedback to improve @zpid.bsky.social's service PreReg! If you haven't participated yet, we'd greatly appreciate your feedback! Thanks!✨
Link: www.soscisurvey.de/zpid_prereg/
#OpenScience
The new version of PreReg is now available via: https://prereg-psych.org
🌟 We have launched our preregistration platform PreReg! 🌟
PreReg guides researchers through all the steps of pre-registration and now offers an even clearer structure.
#Preregistration #OpenScience #Psychology
leibniz-psychology.org/en/news/deta...
Here is a new collection of resources regarding preregistrations including a shiny app for the generation of preregistrations, help for reporting deviations, literature on preregistrations etc.
prereg-psych.org
Calling all #psych researchers!📢
We’re conducting a quick survey on #preregistration & would love your input on what features an ideal prereg platform should have. We will use your feedback to improve @zpid.bsky.social's service PreReg! Thanks!✨
Link: www.soscisurvey.de/zpid-prereg/
#OpenScience