Advertisement · 728 × 90

Posts by Frederick Britt

Preview
Synthese Topical Collection "Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate" Call for Papers: Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate Guest Editors: Matthias Egg, Mahdi Khalili and Frederick Britt (University of Bern) Topical Collection Description: It has...

Call for papers: Synthese Topical Collection "Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate". Deadline: March 31, 2026. Guest editors: Matthias Egg, Mahdi Khalili & myself, @unibe.ch. Looking forward to your contributions!

philevents.org/event/show/1...

#philsci

5 months ago 6 5 2 0
Preview
The Engine of Scientific Discovery: How New Methods and Tools Spark Major Breakthroughs Abstract. How do we spark new scientific discoveries? Why do some breakthroughs seem even accidental? And most importantly, how can we accelerate them and

⚗️🔭 How do we spark new scientific discoveries? Why do some breakthroughs seem accidental?

The new book 'The Engine of Scientific Discovery' by CPNSS Research Associate Alexander Krauss is for anyone who wants to understand how we make discoveries.

➡ Link to the book: doi.org/10.1093/oso/...

1 month ago 15 16 0 0

Deadline approaching!☝️

#philsci

1 month ago 2 0 0 1
Preview
The Long Ukrainian Winter How You Can Help

Russia’s full-scale invasion began 4 years ago. It began in winter, and so this winter is the 5th. And, for civilians, the worst. Russia launches missiles and drones at energy infrastructure to force Ukrainians to endure the freezing cold. Here's how you can help
snyder.substack.com/p/the-long-u...

2 months ago 1367 588 30 18
ABSTRACT. Newton's gravitational theory is a hard case for scientific realists, as despite its overwhelming empirical success, what the theory tells us about the nature of gravitational forces seems to be inconsistent with our current best theory of gravity, namely, the general theory of relativity. After demonstrating the limitations of existing responses to that challenge, I argue that a better response can be given by questioning a premise that has so far been taken for granted in the debate: the assumption that all inertial forces are fictitious. Rejecting this premise is justified by distinguishing different types of inertial forces, some of which are indispensable in a sufficiently strong sense to justify realism about them.

ABSTRACT. Newton's gravitational theory is a hard case for scientific realists, as despite its overwhelming empirical success, what the theory tells us about the nature of gravitational forces seems to be inconsistent with our current best theory of gravity, namely, the general theory of relativity. After demonstrating the limitations of existing responses to that challenge, I argue that a better response can be given by questioning a premise that has so far been taken for granted in the debate: the assumption that all inertial forces are fictitious. Rejecting this premise is justified by distinguishing different types of inertial forces, some of which are indispensable in a sufficiently strong sense to justify realism about them.

Just accepted:

Realism about Newtonian Gravity
– Matthias Egg

Abstract in alt text or read it here: www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/740610

#philsci #philsky

2 months ago 14 2 0 0

Deadline approaching!👇

#philsci

3 months ago 9 5 1 0

It looks like the Philosophy of Science Association could use a little help reaching its fundraising goal for #GivingTuesday 😳 Show your pride in #philsci & chip in @ least what you'd pay for a coffee/drink. Every little bit counts & it's easy (& tax deductible) @ link below ⬇️
philsci.org/donate.php

4 months ago 5 2 0 0

New on the Archive:

Van Dyck, Maarten (2026) Defending constructive empiricism. [Preprint]

https://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/27313/

4 months ago 5 2 0 0
Gifted Khashoggi Head Mounted In Oval Office

Gifted Khashoggi Head Mounted In Oval Office

Gifted Khashoggi Head Mounted In Oval Office

5 months ago 1630 212 27 10

We plan to offer travel grants for people who cannot obtain their own funding. So please, do not hesitate to submit something until January 31, 2026!

5 months ago 1 0 0 0
Advertisement
Preview
Entity Realism Beyond Manipulation Entity realism (also known as ‘experimental realism’) traditionally ties belief in scientific entities to experimental manipulation. Yet many sciences involve a commitment to entities that...

Call for Papers

Workshop on 'ENTITY REALISM BEYOND MANIPULATION' (June 16 - 17, 2025) at the University of Bern (CH).

We are very much looking forward to welcoming Nora M. Boyd and @msuarez.bsky.social as keynote speakers and invite further contributions!

#philsci

philevents.org/event/show/1...

5 months ago 8 3 1 1
Preview
Were Dinos On Their Way Out Before The Asteroid Hit? Maybe Not Two new studies suggest that, contrary to longstanding beliefs, dinosaurs were not on the decline before the Chicxulub asteroid impact.

People have long wondered if dinosaurs really would've thrived if not for the asteroid that killed them. Two new studies, involving paleontologists @stevebrusatte.bsky.social and Lindsay Zanno, dig further into that question.

5 months ago 64 21 1 1
Extending the Scope of Causal Realism

This collection follows on from our conference in July, where we heard a series of excellent talks on these themes. The collection will continue the discussion and invite further contributions engaging with the same set of questions.

www.philosophie.unibe.ch/research/pro...

5 months ago 0 0 0 0
Preview
Synthese Topical Collection "Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate" Call for Papers: Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate Guest Editors: Matthias Egg, Mahdi Khalili and Frederick Britt (University of Bern) Topical Collection Description: It has...

Call for papers: Synthese Topical Collection "Meta-Level Reflections on the Scientific Realism Debate". Deadline: March 31, 2026. Guest editors: Matthias Egg, Mahdi Khalili & myself, @unibe.ch. Looking forward to your contributions!

philevents.org/event/show/1...

#philsci

5 months ago 6 5 2 0

@philsci-archive.bsky.social is finally here! Nice!

5 months ago 6 1 1 0

'How can we explain the fact that we have concepts X and Y using primordial capacities?' ... 🤷‍♂️

5 months ago 0 0 1 0
Inferring to the Best Explanation from Uncertain Evidence | Philosophy of Science | Cambridge Core Inferring to the Best Explanation from Uncertain Evidence

A weirdly underappreciated problem about Inference to the Best Explanation is how it can handle uncertain evidence. This new paper, now forthcoming in Philosophy of Science, proposes a strategy for doing that (and argues that Einstein may have used it). #philsky #philsci

doi.org/10.1017/psa....

7 months ago 25 10 3 0
Advertisement
The photo shows an Acheulean biface handaxe knapped from dark grey flint with a creamy-white cortical layer, shown against a black background. The handaxe is roughly tear-drop shaped with a pointed tip and rounded bottom. There is a fossil shell centrally displayed on one face, identified as the Cretaceous bivalve mollusc Spondylus spinosus. Above the shell to the right is a small rectangular museum label. The toolmaker has knapped the flint in such a way as to retain the shell in a central position. Measurements 79mm x 35mm x 132mm Weight 0.375kg. Collections of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge.

The photo shows an Acheulean biface handaxe knapped from dark grey flint with a creamy-white cortical layer, shown against a black background. The handaxe is roughly tear-drop shaped with a pointed tip and rounded bottom. There is a fossil shell centrally displayed on one face, identified as the Cretaceous bivalve mollusc Spondylus spinosus. Above the shell to the right is a small rectangular museum label. The toolmaker has knapped the flint in such a way as to retain the shell in a central position. Measurements 79mm x 35mm x 132mm Weight 0.375kg. Collections of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge.

Something beautiful for the weekend!

An extraordinary Acheulean handaxe knapped around a fossil shell c. 500,000-300,000 years ago!

The shell’s central display has been described as an example of aesthetic intention by the toolmaker.

West Tofts, Norfolk. 📷 MAA Cambridge University

#Archaeology

7 months ago 1367 388 37 32
Comic. [chessboard where one block of 2x2 sliding squares is shifted inward, with a blank next to it indicating the direction of the block’s movement] [caption] Sliding Number Puzzle Chess

Comic. [chessboard where one block of 2x2 sliding squares is shifted inward, with a blank next to it indicating the direction of the block’s movement] [caption] Sliding Number Puzzle Chess

Chess Variant

xkcd.com/3139/

7 months ago 3025 321 71 33

Perspectival Realism + Ecological Psychology = Ecological Perspectivism

"Science offers knowledge of reality in terms of affordances, which are relational to the instruments and abilities of scientific communities."

#PhilSci #PsycSci

7 months ago 21 6 2 0
Preview
What is Critical Metascience and Why is it Important? If science is the subject of metascience, then metascience is the subject of critical metascience!

He's already replied, but @markrubin.bsky.social is an excellent scholar coming from metasci side reaching across to philsci. A lovely newsletter of his landed in mailbox today on how metasci might need to incorporate more critical (dare I say philosophical?) perspectives⤵️

8 months ago 13 5 1 0
Preview
OMG OMG OMG — Extinct Okay, so… this morning, I read this fun little article in the New York Times, which describes a statistical model designed to rank baseball players across eras. Barry Bonds came out on top, which ...

Fun article in the NYT today describing a statistical model for ranking baseball players across eras. The Extinct connection? The model (called the "Full House" model) is inspired by Stephen Jay Gould's work on the disappearance of .400 hitting. Pretty coooool
www.extinctblog.org/palaeonews/2...

8 months ago 5 2 0 0

Thanks to all the speakers and participants!

8 months ago 0 0 0 0
Program and recordings

It's been over a month since our conference on the realism debate, held at the @unibe.ch and supported by the @snsf.ch. The recordings are now available online!😁

The image and audio quality, I'm afraid, is mixed despite editing, but here they are:

www.philosophie.unibe.ch/research/pro...

#philsci

8 months ago 5 1 1 0
What does it mean to say that science is value-laden? - PhilSci-Archive

philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26034/

8 months ago 4 0 1 1
Rigour from rules: Deduction and definition in mathematical physics - PhilSci-Archive

philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26010/

8 months ago 0 0 0 0
Advertisement
The Benefits of Ambivalence and the Context of Suicide Intervention - PhilSci-Archive

philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26046/

8 months ago 0 0 0 0
Quantum Systems as Indivisible Stochastic Processes - PhilSci-Archive

This isn't quite working yet ...

philsci-archive.pitt.edu/26042/

8 months ago 0 0 0 0

I'm hereby making an honest attempt at using this platform. It's all quite confusing to me, making me feel very old. But so be it; here goes!

9 months ago 9 1 2 0
"Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide" on a plain background. Text notes that the book is edited by Sophie Veigl and Adrian Currie. The cover features a colorful design with planets and geometric shapes.

"Methods in the Philosophy of Science: A User's Guide" on a plain background. Text notes that the book is edited by Sophie Veigl and Adrian Currie. The cover features a colorful design with planets and geometric shapes.

The last twenty years have seen multiple methodological revolutions in the philosophy of science. In "Methods in the Philosophy of Science," Sophie Veigl and Adrian Currie introduce this range of methods through both practical advice and philosophical reflection: bit.ly/3GnXFxb

9 months ago 28 6 0 1