π«ππ«
Posts by Jess
Once again, not American. But given your comments, not surprising you already forgot that
Oh no, I got your point, when you called wanting better than the bottom of the barrel purity tests and perfection. Your thought experiment seems to be lacking in thought
Utter nonsense. There's lots of room between newsom & perfection. Pointing out his inadequacies is not demanding perfection. And he isn't even the dem candidate, yet some people insist on acting as though he is, & making up nonsense like you posted to deflect genuine criticism & hide other options
π«ππ«
Your Nationality is irrelevant, and completely unknown to me. I am not American.
When people point how deeply flawed newsom is, the best response is agreement and discussion of better options, not pushing the idea that it's a choice between him and vance
Thankfully not American
You shouldn't even frame it as "if Vance or newsom". Yes, pretty much anyone would be a better choice than Vance, however newsom shouldn't even be considered. People need to start framing as newsom and Vance are both bad options, so who can the dems promote as a better option
That's a big problem, portraying him as the only option. It's not true. Now is the time to stand up and say he isn't good enough, and promote better options.
Photo of a model wearing fawn print rib polo top
Model wearing black mini skirt and fawn print rib polo top
Thinking of bringing back fawn polo!
Labor is choosing to make Defense spending a priority while ignoring poverty. This is who they are
*cuddles*
π«
If anyone can like sling us like a bit of money to get some groceries weβd appreciate it. Even a few bucks would get us some things
www.paypal.com/paypalme/inf...
None of those are manufactured political segregation. Science does not support keeping trans people out of sport. It is a political/bigotry position. And that kind of segregation is not to be dismissed or downplayed.
You are correct it is a far right manufactured issue. A wedge to trans genocide. So people should not be accomplices to it. And people should not be allowed to pat themselves on the back and claim they are on someone's side, while being an accomplice.
Skipping straight past science and empathy, another character assessment. But as for sports, are you seriously suggesting segregation is not, and was not, a human rights issue?
π«ππ«
Science, empathy, basic human rights. Yeah, when you "disagree" with those, it's a pretty clear character assessment. "Compromising" on those issues in an attempt to appease the far right isn't compromise, it's being an accomplice, and any "good will" was weak, performative and thrown under the bus
You are kind, caring, thoughtful, funny, interesting, smart, talented, you are wonderful
Aww
Do any of the free to air channels have those?
π«ππ«
A tweet from Insider Paper quotes Spainβs Prime Minister saying the country will not applaud those who βset the world on fire just because they turn up with a bucket,β referring to a ceasefire.
Beautifully put.
Oh wow, what a convincing argument. Transphobes use misogynistic, patriarchal standards of femininity. Transphobes attack both trans and cis women who do not match those standards. Transphobia is inherently misogynistic.
Misogyny is also a core component of her husbands transphobia
π«
π«ππ«
π«