Simply arranging things in the order described above seems to provide the safety of a concrete barrier without the cost of one.

Can someone explain to me why this can’t work in American cities? 4/4

This requires cars to drive across parked cars and a sidewalk to hit cyclists. It also makes it so parked cars can’t door cyclists on the passenger side. A concrete barrier could also do this, but it would cost a lot more money to build one everywhere you want a bike lane. 3/4

I dont understand why what works in the Netherlands can’t work here. Their system is simple. Starting from the center line, put as many car traffic lanes as you plan to have. Next to that, put vehicle parking. After that, put the pedestrian sidewalk. Lastly, put a bike lane. (2/x)

Can someone explain something to me? I keep seeing all these requests for concrete barriers to separate bike lanes, and I feel like that’s not the right approach. It seems like an unnecessary cost that makes bike lanes less achieveable. 1/x

A handsome statue of Abraham Lincoln

A handsome statue of Abraham Lincoln

Mayor: You finish that statue of Lincoln for the federal courthouse?
Sculptor: Sure did boss, real fuckin sexy just like you asked.
Mayor: what